To address the increasing demand for mass undergraduate management education and, at the same time, a greater emphasis on student teamwork, this study outlines the development, delivery, and evaluation of a training intervention designed to build team-coaching skills in teaching assistants. Specifically, practice-centered and problem-centered techniques were used to provide teaching assistants with experiential learning opportunities to help them develop their skills. The authors evaluated the training intervention using a mixed-method multiple-data source design. Both the teaching assistants being trained as well as the student teams’ experiences and perceptions of their coaches’ performance were assessed. The evaluation showed that teaching assistants reported finding the program a positive experience. Importantly, students with trained coaches reported higher levels of coaching performance, team functioning, and productivity than those with untrained coaches. The implications of this intervention are discussed.
Ancona, D., Kochan T.A., Scully, M., Van Maanen, J., & Westney, E.D. ( 2005). Managing for the future: Organizational behavior & processes (pp. 10-12). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
2.
Bolton, M.K. ( 1999). The role of coaching in student teams: A "just-in-time" approach to learning. Journal of Management Education, 23, 233-250.
3.
Brown, T.C., Li, S., Sargent, L.D., & Tasa, K.G. ( 2003). What went wrong at University hospital? An exercise assessing training effectiveness. Journal of Management Education, 27, 485-497.
4.
Business Higher Education Round Table. (2002 ). Enhancing the learning and employability of graduates: The role of generic skills. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Author.
5.
Carlopio, J., Andrewartha, G., & Armstrong, H. ( 2001). Developing management skills: A comprehensive guide for leaders (2nd ed.). Frenchs Forest, New South Wales, Australia: Pearson.
6.
Carson, J.B., Tesluk, P.E., & Marrone, J.A. ( 2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal , 50, 1217-1234.
7.
Cole, M., & Engestrom, Y. ( 1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition . In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp.1-46). New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Cook T. D., & Campbell, D.T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
9.
De Vries, K. ( 2005). Leadership group coaching in action: The Zen of creating high performance teams. Academy of Management Executive, 19, 61-76.
10.
Ettington, D.R., & Camp, R.R. ( 2002). Facilitating transfer of skills between group projects and work teams. Journal of Management Education, 26, 356-376.
11.
Fenwick, T. ( 2001). Tides of change: New themes and questions in workplace learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education , 92, 3-17.
12.
Finn, F.A., Mason, C.M., & Bradley, L.M. ( 2007, August). Doing well with executive coaching: Psychological and behavioral impacts. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Conference, Philadelphia, PA.
13.
Fowler, J.L., Gundmundsson, A., & Whicker, L. ( 2006). Groups work! A guide for working in groups. Bowen Hills, Queensland: Australian Academic Press .
14.
Gibson, D.E. ( 2004). Role models in career development: New directions for theory and research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 134-156.
15.
Goldstein, I.L. ( 1991). Training in work organizations. In M. D. Dunnett & L. M. Hough (Eds). Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 507-619). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
16.
Greeno, J.G. ( 1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53, 5-26.
17.
Hackman, R. ( 2002). Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances (pp. 3-33). Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
18.
Hackman, J.R., & Wageman, R. ( 2005). A theory of team coaching. Academy of Management Review, 30, 269-287.
19.
Hesketh, B. ( 1997). Dilemmas in training for transfer and retention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46, 317-339.
20.
Hmelo-Silver, C.E. ( 2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn ? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235-266.
21.
Hmelo-Silver, C.E., & Barrows, H.S. ( 2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator . Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 1, 21-39.
22.
Kraiger, K., Ford, J.K., & Salas, E. ( 1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 311-328.
23.
Latham, G.P., & Seijts, G.H. ( 1995). Management development. In P. J. D. Drenth, C. de Wolff, & H. Thierry (Eds.), New handbook of work and organization psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 257-272). Houten, the Netherlands: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum.
24.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. ( 1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation . New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
London, M., & Sessa, V.I. ( 2007). How groups learn, continuously. Human Resource Management, 46, 651-669.
26.
London, M., & Smither, J.W. ( 1999). Empowered self-development and continuous learning. Human Resource Management, 38, 3-15.
27.
Luthans, F., & Peterson, S.J. (2003). 360-degree feedback with systematic coaching: Empirical analysis suggests a winning combination. Human Resource Management, 42, 243-256.
28.
O’Connor, D., & Yballe, L. ( 2007). Team leadership: Critical steps to great projects. Journal of Management Education, 31, 292-312.
29.
O’Neil, D.A. & Hopkins, M.M. ( 2002). The teacher as coach approach: Pedagogical choices for management educators. Journal of Management Education, 26, 402-414.
30.
Saks A.M., Schmitt, N.W., & Klimoski, R.J. (2000). Research, measurement and evaluation of human resources. Ontario, Canada: Thomson.
31.
Sargent, L.D., & Sue-Chan, C. ( 2001). Does diversity affect group efficacy? The intervening role of cohesion and task interdependence. Small Group Research , 32, 426-451.
32.
Schein, E.H. ( 1969). Process consultation: Its role in organizational development . Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Schon, D.A. ( 1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books .
35.
Smither, J.W., London, M., Flautt, R., Vargas, Y., & Kucine, I. ( 2003). Can working with an executive coach improve multi-source feedback ratings over time? A quasi-experimental feedback study. Personnel Psychology, 48, 1-34.
36.
Sue-Chan, C., & Latham, G.P. ( 2004). The relative effectiveness of external, peer, and self-coaches . Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 260-278.
37.
Taylor P.J., Russ-Eft, D.F., & Chan D.W.L. ( 2005). A meta-analytic review of behavior modeling training , Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 692-709.
38.
Thach. L. ( 2002). The impact of executive coaching and 360 degree feedback on leadership effectiveness. Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 23, 205-214.
39.
Wageman, R. ( 2001). How leaders foster self-managing team effectiveness: Design choices versus hands-on coaching. Organization Science , 12, 269-287.
40.
Webster, J., & Martocchio, J.J. (1993). Turning work into play: Implications for microcomputer software training. Journal of Management, 19, 127-146.
41.
Wertsch, J.V., del Rio, P., & Alvarez, A. ( 1995). Sociocultural studies: History, action, and mediation . In J. Wertsch, P. del Rio, & A. Alvarez (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of mind (pp. 1-37). New York: Cambridge University Press.
