Astley, W.G. and Van deVen, A. H. Central Perspectives and Debates in Organization Theory . Administrative Science Quarterly,28, 1983, pp. 245-273.
2.
Ball, T. FromParadigms to Research Programs: Toward a post-Kuhnian Political Science . American Journal of Political Science, 20, 1976, pp. 151-177.
3.
Beyer, J.M.Editorial Policies and Practices among Leading Journals in Four Scientific Fields. Sociological Quarterly, 19, 1978, pp. 66-88.
4.
Burrell, G. and Morgan, G.Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. London : Heinemann, 1979.
5.
Campbell, D.T.Ethnocentrism of Disciplines and the Fish-Scale Model of Omniscience . In M. Sherif and C. W. Sherif (eds.), Interdisciplinary Relationships in the Social Sciences. Chicago: Aldine , 1969, pp. 328-348.
6.
Chubin, D.E. and T. Connolly, Research trails and science policies: Local and extra-local negotiation of scientific work. In N. Elias, H. Martins, and T. Whitley , (eds.), Scientific establishments and hierarchies. Sociology of the sciences, vol. VI, 1982, pp. 293-311.
7.
Cole, J.R. and S. Cole, SocialStratification in Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1973.
8.
Cole, S. and J.R. Cole, Scientific Output and Recognition: A study in the operation of the reward system in science. American Sociological Review, 32, 1967, 377-390.
9.
Connolly, T.Towards a Reintegration of Organizational Behavior, The Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 9, 1984 , 1-3.
10.
Crane, D.Scientists at Major and Minor Universities: A Study of Productivity and Recognition . American Sociological Review, 30, 1967, pp. 699-714.
11.
Cummings, L.L. and P. Frost, Publishing in the Organizational Sciences. Homewood, Ill. : Irwin, forthcoming.
12.
Davis, M.S.That's interesting!Philosophy of Social Science, 1, 1971, pp. 309-344.
13.
Garvey, W.D., Lin, N., and C. E. Nelson, SomeComparisons of Communication Activities in the Physical and Social Sciences. In C. E. Nelson and D. K. Pollock, (eds.), Communication among scientists and engineers. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath, 1970 , pp. 61-84.
14.
Hammond, P. E., (ed.) Sociologists at Work . New York: Basic Books, 1964.
15.
Kuhn, T.S.The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago : University of Chicago Press, 1962.
16.
Lakatos, I. and A. Musgrave , (eds.) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. London: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
17.
Lin, N., W.D. Garvey, and E.E. Nelson, A Study of the Communication Structure of Science. In C. E. Nelson and D. K. Pollock (eds.), Communication among scientists and engineers. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath, 1970 .
18.
Lin, N. and C.E. Nelson, Bibliographic Reference Patterns in Core Sociological Journals, 1965-1966 . American Sociologist, 4, 1969, pp. 47-50.
19.
Lodahl, J.B. and G. Gordon, The Structure of Scientific Fields and the Functioning of University Graduate Departments. American Sociological Review, 37, 1972, 57-72.
20.
Lodahl, J.B. and G. Gordon, Differences between Physical and Social Sciences in University Graduate Departments . Research in Higher Education, 1, 1973, pp. 191-213. Mitroff , I.A.The Subjective Side of Science. New York: Elsevier , 1974.
21.
Morgan, G. Paradigms, Metaphors, and PuzzleSolving in Organization Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly,25, 1980, pp. 605-622.
22.
Mullins, N. C. Theories and TheoryGroups in Contemporary American Sociology. New York: Harper & Row, 1973.
23.
Pfeffer, J., A. Leong, and K. Strehl, Paradigm Development and Particularism: Journal publication in three scientific disciplines. Social Forces, 55, 1977, pp. 938-951.
24.
Pfeffer, J. and W.L. Moore, Average Tenure of Academic Department Heads: The effects of paradigm, size, and departmental demography. Administrative Science Quarterly,25, 1980, 387-406.
25.
Pondy, L.R. and D. Boje, Bringing Mind Back In: Paradigm development as a frontier in organization theory. In W. Evan, (ed.), Frontiers in organization and management. New York: Praeger, 1980, pp. 83-101.
26.
Popper, K.The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchison, 1959.
27.
Price, D. de Solla.Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press, 1963.
28.
Price, D. de Solla.Networks of Scientific Papers, Science, 149, 1965, pp. 510-515.
29.
Ritzer, G. Sociology: A Multiple Paradigm Science. American Sociologist , 10, 1975, 156-167.
30.
Ritzer, G.Paradigm Analysis in Sociology: Clarifying the issues. American Sociological Review, 46, 1981, pp. 245-248.
31.
Salancik, G.R., B.M. Staw, and L. R. Pondy, AdministrativeTurnover as a Response to Unmanaged Organizational Interdependence. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 1980, pp. 422-437.
32.
Smith, L.C.Citation Analysis, Library Trends, 30, Summer, 1981, pp. 83-106.
33.
Suppe, F., (ed.) The Structure of Scientific Theories. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1974.
34.
Zammuto, R.F. and T. Connolly, On the dubious health of organizational research: Do we need a doctor or an undertaker? Presented at the Western Academy of Management meeting, Vancouver, B.C., April 1984.
35.
Zuckerman, H. and R.K. Merton, Patterns of Evaluation in Science: Institutionalization, Structure and Function of the Referee System. Minerva, 9, 1971, pp. 66-101.