Pre-Instructional Minitests: An Efficient Solution to the Problem of Covering Content

Abstract

This article is aimed at achieving two purposes: (a) challenging the common and often unrecognized assumption that the only way to ensure that students are exposed to course concepts is by personally going over the material in class and (b) describing how minitests (i.e., individual test -+ group test -+ appeals -- instructor input) can be used to ensure that students master basic content in a fraction of the class time that would normally be devoted to lectures. Other benefits of minitests are also described. These include increased focus on higher-level thinking and problem-solving skills, development of students' interpersonal and group interaction skills, and providing students with experience as a member of an effective team.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bargh, J. A. , & Schul, Y. (1980). On the cognitive benefits of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(5), 593-604.

Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: David McKay.

Hampton, D. R. (1993). Testbook test file multiple choice questions can measure: (a) knowledge,(b) intellectual ability, (c) neither, (d) both. Journal of Management Education, 17, 454-471.

Jones, C. A. (1982). Peer tutoring in project teams. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oklahoma, Norman.

Michaelsen, L. K. (1992). Team learning: A comprehensive approach for harnessing the power of small groups in higher education. In D. H. Wulff & J. D. Nyquist (Eds.), To improve the academy, 1992. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.

Michaelsen, L. K. , Cragin, J. P. , & Watson, W. E. (1981). Grading and anxiety: A strategy for coping. Exchange: The Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal, 6(1), 8-14.

Michaelsen, L. K. , Watson, W. E. , & Black, R. H. (1989). A realistic test of individual versus group consensus decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(5), 834-839.

Michaelsen, L. K. , Watson, W. E. , Cragin, J. P. , & Fink, L. D. (1982). Team learning: Apotential solution to the problems of large classes. Exchange: The Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal, 7(1), 13-22.

Michaelsen, L. K. , Watson, W. E. , & Schraeder, C. B. (1985). Informative testing: A practical approach for tutoring with groups. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, 9(4), 18-33.

10.

Nungester, R. J. , & Duchastel, P. C. (1982). Testing versus review: Effects on retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(1),18-22.

11.

Slavin, R. E. , & Karweit, N. L. (1981). Cognitive and affective outcomes of an intensive student team learning experience. Journal of Experimental Education, 50(1), 29-35.

12.

Watson, W. E. , Michaelsen, L. K. , & Sharp, W. (1991). Member competence, group interaction and group decision-making: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 803-809.

13.

Wilson, W. R. (1982). The ase of permanent learning groups in teaching introductory accounting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oklahoma, Norman.