This study is an investigation of women high school principals in terms of the challenges they face, role conflicts they experience, their role commitment, and their job satisfaction. The purpose is to describe women high school principals addressing the issue of the continued underrepresentation of women in the high school principalship. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from women high school principals in Illinois, Minnesota, and Wisconsin. The findings indicate that role conflict impacts career decisions—respondents delayed entering the high school principalship until the demands of raising their children had lessened. Role conflict is inversely related to job satisfaction; the more role conflict, the lower the level of job satisfaction. The number of students in the school affects job satisfaction and role conflict. Women today may have more career mobility than in the past. Encouragement and mentoring are key factors in enabling women to become high school principals.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlleyR., & MacDonaldS. (1997, March). Using gender knowledge to prepare for secondary school leadership as a principal. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 408 695)
2.
BacharachS., & MitchellS. (1983). The sources of dissatisfaction in educational administration: A role-specific analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 19(1), 101–128.
3.
BellC., & ChaseS. (1993). The underrepresentation of women in school leadership. In MarshallC. (Ed.), The new politics of race and gender.Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
4.
BlountJ. (1998). Destined to rule the schools: Women and the superintendency, 1873–1995.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
5.
BogotchI., & RiedlingerB. (1993). A comparative study of new and experienced principals within an urban school system. Journal of School Leadership, 3, 484–497.
6.
BrunnerC. C. (1997, Fall). Women's ways of succeeding in educational administration. ERS Spectrum, 25–31.
7.
CochranJ. (1979). How do women administrators view job satisfaction and discrimination? In BerryM. (Ed.), Women in educational administration: A book of readings (pp. 150–152). Washington DC: National Association for Women Deans, Administrators and Counselors.
8.
CohnK. (1989, November). Factors associated with the involuntary reassignment of three women principals. Paper presented at the annual conference of Research on Women and Education, San Diego. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 314 831)
9.
EdsonS. (1988). Pushing the limits: The female administrative aspirant.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
10.
EricksonL. (1985, December). Conflict and the female principal. Phi Delta Kappan, December, 1985, 288–291.
11.
FansherT., & BuxtonT. (1984). A job satisfaction profile of the female secondary school principal in the United States. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 68(468), 32–39.
12.
FlemingK. (1991). Mentoring: Is it key to opening doors for women in educational administration?Education Canada, 31(3), 27–33.
13.
GoellerK. (1995, November). Principal leadership: The female component. National Association of Secondary School Principals Bulletin, 105–116.
14.
GotwaltN., & TownsK. (1986). Rare as they are, women at the top can teach us all. The Executive Educator, 13–15.
15.
GradyM. (1992). Women and educational administration: Certified but not employed. Educational Considerations, 20(1), 33–36.
16.
GradyM., CarlsonK., & BrockB. (1992). School administrators: The next generation. Journal of School Leadership, 2, 443–455.
17.
GradyM., & O'ConnellP. (1993). Women in K-12 educational administration: A synthesis of dissertation research. Journal of School Leadership, 3, 449–460.
18.
GroganM. (1996). Voices of women aspiring to the superintendency.Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
19.
GunnJ., & HoldawayE. (1986). Perceptions of effectiveness, influence, and satisfaction of senior high school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly22(2), 43–62.
20.
HillM., & RaglandJ. (1995). Women as educational leaders: Opening windows, pushing ceilings.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
21.
HochschildA. (1989). The second shift: Working parents and the revolution at home.New York: Viking Press.
22.
KellyR. M. (1997). Gender culture and socialization. In DunnD. (Ed.), Workplace/women's place: An anthology.Los Angeles: Roxbury Publishing.
23.
KochanF., SpencerW., & MathewsJ. (2000). Gender-based perceptions of the challenges, changes, and essential skills of the principalship. Journal of School Leadership, 10, 290–310.
MarshallC., & AndersonG. (1995). Rethinking the public and private spheres: Feminist and cultural studies perspectives on the politics of education. In ScribnerJ., and LaytonD. (Eds.), The study of educational politics (pp. 169–182). London: Falmer Press.
26.
MarshallC., & KastenK. (1994). The administrative career: A casebook on entry, equity, and endurance.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
27.
MatthewsE. (1995). Women in educational administration: Views of equity. In DunlapD., & SchmuckP. (Eds.), Women leading in education (pp. 247–273). New York: State University of New York Press.
28.
McCarthyM., & ZentA. (1981, Fall). School administrators: 1980 profile. Planning and Changing, 145–161.
29.
McKennaE. P. (1997). When work doesn't work anymore.New York: Dell Publishing.
30.
MendenhallD. R. (1977). Relationship of organizational structure and leadership behavior to teacher job satisfaction in IGE schools. (Tech. Rep. No. 412). Madison, WI: Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning.
31.
MerrillR., & PounderD. (1999, November). Attraction and retention of high school principals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Minneapolis, MN.
32.
MertzN. (1987). Why women aren't mentored. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting, Portland, Oregon.
33.
MertzN. (1991). Females in school administration: Making sense of the numbers, Planning and Changing, 22(1), 34–35.
34.
MertzN., & McNeelyS. (1988). What's happening to school administration: Gender in line administration. Planning and Changing, 19(3), 166–177.
35.
MertzN., & McNeelyS. (1990, April). Groundbreakers: Females who “succeed” in male-dominated line administrative positions. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association annual meeting, Boston.
36.
MertzN., & McNeelyS. (1994). How are we doing? Women in urban school administration. Urban Education, 28(4), 361–371.
37.
NapholzL. (1995a). Mental health and American Indian women's multiple roles. American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research: Journal of the National Center, 6(2), 57–75.
38.
NapholzL. (1995b). Indexes of psychological well-being and role commitment among working women. Journal of Employment Counseling32(1), 22–32.
39.
NevillD., & DamicoS. (1974). Development of a role conflict questionnaire for women: Some preliminary findings. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(5), 743.
40.
NogayK., & BeebeR. (1997). Gender and perceptions: Females as secondary principals. Journal of School Leadership7, 246–265.
41.
OlsonL. (1999, March 3). Demand for principals growing, but candidates aren't applying. Education Week, 18(25), 1, 20, 22.
42.
OrtizF. (1982). Career patterns in education: Women, men and minorities in public school administration.New York: Praeger.
43.
PaddockS. (1981). Male and female career paths in school administration. In SchmuckP., ChartersW., & CarlsonR. (Eds.), Educational policy and management: Sex differentials (pp. 187–198). New York: Academic Press.
44.
PavanB. (1991, April). Reflections of female school administrators regarding their careers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 334 676)
45.
PavanB. (1999). The first years: What should a female superintendent know beforehand? In BrunnerC. (Ed.), Sacred dreams: Women and the superintendency (pp. 105–123). New York: State University of New York Press.
46.
PigfordA., & TonnsenS. (1993). Barriers to the good ol’ boy network. In PigfordA., & TonnsenS. (Eds.), Women in school leadership (pp. 7–18). Lancaster, PA: Technomic Press.
47.
PoratK. (1985). The woman in the principal's chair in Canada. Phi Delta Kappan, 67(4), 297–301.
48.
PounderD. (1990, October). Educational megatrends and increased female leadership in schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the University Council for Educational Administration, Pittsburgh.
49.
PounderD. (1994). Educational and demographic trends: Implications for women's representation in school leadership. In PrestineN. A., & ThurstonP. W. (Eds.), Advances in Educational Administration3, 135–149.
50.
ProtheroeN. (2001, April). Attracting and retaining high-quality people for the principalship: Problems and possibilities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle.
51.
RiceE. M., & SchneiderG. T. (1994). A decade of teacher empowerment: An empirical analysis of teacher involvement in decision making, 1980–1991. Journal of Educational Administration, 32(1), 43–58.
52.
RieschS. (1981). Occupational commitment, role conflict, and the quality of maternal–infant interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rush University, Chicago, IL.
53.
RogusJ., PoppenhagenB., & MingusJ. (1980). As secondary principals view themselves: Implications for principal preparation. High School Journal63(4), 167–172.
54.
ScherrM. (1995). The glass ceiling reconsidered: Views from below. In DunlapD., & SchmuckP. (Eds.), Women leading in education (pp. 313–326). New York: State University of New York Press.
55.
SchmidtL. (1992, September). Women in educational administration—A disappearing construct. Paper presented at the annual conference of Women in Administration, Lincoln, NE. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 350 707).
56.
SchmuckP. (1981). The sex dimension of school organization: Overview and synthesis. In SchmuckP., ChartersW., & CarlsonR. (Eds.), Educational policy and management: Sex differentials (pp. 221–234). New York: Academic Press.
57.
SchmuckP., & SchubertJ. (1995). Women principals’ views on sex equity: Exploring issues of integration and information. In DunlapD., & SchmuckP. (Eds.), Women leading in education (pp. 274–287). New York: State University of New York Press.
58.
SchneiderG. T. (1984). Teacher involvement in decision making: Zones of acceptance, decision conditions, and job satisfaction. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 18(1), 25–32.
59.
SchneiderG. T. (1986, April). Career path and mobility differences of women and men in educational administration. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
60.
ShakeshaftC. (1989). Women in educational administration.Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
61.
StromquistN. (1997). Gender policies in American education. In MarshallC. (Ed.), Feminist critical policy analysis I: A perspective from primary and secondary schooling (pp. 54–72). London: Falmer Press.
62.
ValentineP. (1995). Women's working worlds: A case study of a female organization. In DunlapD., & SchmuckP. (Eds.), Women leading in education (pp. 340–357). New York: State University of New York Press.
