This article problematizes conventional school–family partnerships, as geared toward narrow school agendas or mandates for collaboration, and documents efforts to lead more authentic partnerships as part of socially just urban schools. Just as meaningful parent involvement needs to go “beyond the bake sale,” so, too, must leadership for authentic partnerships go beyond symbolic activities such as coffee with the principal. Based on qualitative data from two studies of Los Angeles administrators in predominantly Latino immigrant schools, this article proposes a continuum for understanding varying approaches to leadership for partnerships and composes portraits of three school leaders dedicated to dialogue, parent advocacy, and community revitalization.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonG. (1998). Toward authentic participation: Deconstructing the discourses of participatory reforms in education. American Educational Research Journal, 35(4), 571–603.
2.
Andre-BechelyL., & BernsteinS. (1998). Building parent leadership in school reform through school–university collaboration. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego.
3.
AuerbachS. (2002). “Why do they give the good classes to some and not to others?” Latino parent narratives of struggle in a college access program. Teachers College Record, 104(7), 1369–1392.
4.
AuerbachS. (2007a). From moral supporters to struggling advocates: Reconceptualizing parent roles in education through the experience of working-class families of color. Urban Education, 42(3), 250–283.
5.
AuerbachS. (2007b). Visioning parent engagement in urban schools: Role constructions of Los Angeles administrators. Journal of School Leadership, 17(6), 699–735.
6.
AuerbachS. (2009). Walking the walk: Portraits in leadership for family engagement in urban schools. School Community Journal19(1), 9–32.
7.
AuerbachS., & CollierS. (2010, April–May). Bringing high stakes to immigrant parent education: Lessons from a targeted family literacy program. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Denver, CO.
8.
BolivarJ., & ChrispeelsJ. H. (2008, March). Enhancing parent leadership through building social and intellectual capital. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
9.
BrykA. S., & SchneiderB. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement.New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
10.
ChrispeelsJ. (2004). The dynamics of sharing and distributing leadership. In ChrispeelsJ. (Ed.), Learning to lead together: The promise and challenge of sharing leadership (pp. 3–20). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
CollierS., & AuerbachS. (2010, March). Bilingual family program development in the post–Proposition 227 era: Defining the role of language in program design and implementation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Applied Linguistics, Atlanta, GA.
12.
ConstantinoS. (2003). Engaging all families for student success: Creating a positive school culture by putting research into practice.Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.
13.
CooperC. W. (2009). Parent involvement, African American mothers, and the politics of educational care. Equity & Excellence in Education, 42(4), 379–394.
14.
CooperC. W. (2010). Educational leaders as cultural workers: Engaging families and school communities through transformative leadership. In HorsfordS. D. (Ed.), New perspectives in educational leadership: Exploring social, political, and community contexts and meaning (pp. 173–196). New York: Lang.
15.
CooperC. W., & ChristieC. A. (2005). Evaluating parent empowerment: A look at the potential of social justice evaluation in education. Teachers College Record, 107(10), 2248–2274.
16.
Council of Chief State School Officers. (1996). Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium (ISLLC): Standards for school leaders.Washington, DC: Author.
17.
DeckerL. E., DeckerV. A., & BrownP. M. (2007). Diverse partnerships for student success: Strategies and tools to help school leaders.Lanham, MD: Row-man & Littlefield Education.
18.
Delgado-GaitanC. (1994). Spanish-speaking families’ involvement in schools. In FagnanoC. L., & WerberB. Z. (Eds.), School, family, and community interaction: A view from the firing lines (pp. 85–96). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
19.
EpsteinJ. L. (1990). School and family connections: Theory, research and implications for integrating sociologies of education and family. In UngerD. G., & SussmanM. B. (Eds.), Families in community settings: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 99–126). New York: Haworth Press.
20.
EpsteinJ. L., & SandersM. (2006). Prospects for change: Preparing educators for school, family, and community partnerships. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(2), 81–120.
21.
EpsteinJ. L., SandersM. G., SimonB. S., SalinasK. C., JansornN. R., & Van VoorhisF. L. (2002). School, family and community partnerships: Your handbook for action (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
22.
FineM. (1993). [Ap]parent involvement: Reflections on parents, power, and urban public schools. Teachers College Record, 94(4), 682–709.
23.
FurmanG. C., & ShieldsC. M. (2003). How can educational leaders promote and support social justice and democratic community in schools? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
24.
FurmanG. C., & StarrattR. J. (2002). Leadership for democratic community in schools. In MurphyJ. (Ed.), The educational leadership challenge: Redefining leadership for the 21st century (pp. 105–133). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.
25.
GoldringE. B., & HausmanC. (2001). Civic capacity and school principals: The missing links for community development. In CrowsonR. (Ed.), Community development and school reform (pp. 193–210). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
26.
GordonM. F., & LouisK. S. (2009, November). Linking parent and community involvement with student achievement: Comparing principal and teacher perceptions of stakeholder influence. American Journal of Education, 116, 1–31.
27.
GriffithJ. (2001). Principal leadership of parent involvement. Journal of Educational Administration39(2), 162–186.
28.
HendersonA. T., & MappK. L. (2002). A new wave of evidence: The impact of school, family and community connections on student achievement.Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
29.
HendersonA. T., MappK. L., JohnsonV. R., & DaviesD. (2007). Beyond the bake sale: The essential guide to family–school partnerships.New York: New Press.
30.
HenryM. E. (1996). Parent–school collaboration: Feminist organizational structures and school leadership.Albany: State University of New York Press.
31.
HoffD. F., YoderN., & HoffP. S. (2006). Preparing educational leaders to embrace the “public” in public schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(3), 239–249.
32.
Hoover-DempseyK. V., & SandlerH. M. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their children's education?Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 3–42.
33.
JordanC., OrozcoE., & AverettA. (2002). Emerging issues in school, family and community connections: Annual synthesis 2001.Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
34.
LareauA. (1989). Home advantage: Social class and parental intervention in elementary education.New York: Falmer Press.
35.
LareauA., & HorvatE. M. (1999). Moments of social inclusion: Race, class and cultural capital in family-school relationships. Sociology of Education, 71, 39–56.
36.
Lawrence-LightfootS., & Hoffman DavisJ. (1997). The art and science of portraiture.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
37.
LeithwoodK. A., & RiehlC. (2003, April). What do we already know about successful school leadership? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Leadership Association, Chicago.
38.
LightfootD. (2004). “Some parents just don't care”: Decoding the meanings of parental involvement in urban schools. Urban Education, 39(1), 91–107.
39.
LindsayR. B., RobinsK. N., & TerrellR. D. (2003). Cultural proficiency: A manual for school leaders (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CACorwin Press.
40.
LópezG. R., & StoeltingK. (2010). Disarticulating parent involvement in Latina/o impacted schools in the Midwest. In Miller MarshM., & Turner-VorbeckT. (Eds.), Learning to listen to families in schools (pp. 31–48). New York: Teachers College Press.
41.
MehanH., VillanuevaI., HubbardL., & LintzA. (1996). Constructing school success: The consequences of untracking low-achieving students.New York: Cambridge University Press.
42.
MerriamS. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43.
MilesM. B., & HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
44.
MiretskyD. (2004). The communication requirements of democratic schools: Parent–teacher perspectives on their relationships. Teachers College Record, 106(4), 814–851.
45.
MolesO. C. (1993). Collaboration between schools and disadvantaged parents: Obstacles and openings. In ChavkinN. F. (Ed.), Families and schools in a pluralistic society (pp. 21–52). Albany: State University of New York Press.
46.
MollL., AmantiC., NeffD., & GonzalezN. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.
47.
OakesJ., RogersJ., & LiptonM. (2006). Learning power: Organizing for education and justice.New York: Teachers College Press.
48.
OlivosE. M. (2006). The power of parents: A critical perspective of bicultural parent involvement in public schools.New York: Lang.
49.
OstermanK. F., CrowG. M., & RosenJ. L. (1997). New urban principals: Role conceptions at the entry level. Urban Education, 32(3), 373–393.
50.
PeshkinA. (1988). In search of subjectivity—one's own. Educational Researcher, 17(7), 17–21.
51.
PounderD. G. (1998). Promises and pitfalls of school collaboration: Synthesizing dilemmas. In PounderD. G. (Ed.), Restructuring schools for collaboration: Promises and pitfalls (pp. 173–180). Albany: State University of New York Press.
52.
PushorD. (2010). Are schools doing enough to learn about families? In Miller MarshM., & Turner-VorbeckT. (Eds.), Learning to listen to families in schools (pp. 4–16). New York: Teachers College Press.
53.
RosenbergH., LopezM. E., & WestmorelandH. (2009, November). Family engagement: A shared responsibility. In Family Involvement Network for Educators Newsletter.Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project.
54.
RubinH. J., & RubinI. S. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
55.
SpillaneJ. P. (2006). Distributed leadership.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
56.
SwapS. M. (1993). Developing home–school partnerships: From concept to practice.New York: Teachers College Press.
57.
TheoharisG. (2009). The school leaders our children deserve: Seven keys to equity, social justice, and school reform.New York: Teachers College Press.
58.
TillmanL. (2004, spring). African American parental involvement in a post-Brown era: Facilitating the academic achievement of African American students. Journal of School Public Relations, 25, 161–176.
59.
ValenciaR. R. (1997). Conceptualizing the notion of deficit thinking. In ValenciaR. R. (Ed.), The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice (pp. 1–13). Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
60.
WellsA. S., & SernaI. (1996). The politics of culture: Understanding local political resistance to detracking in racially mixed schools. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 93–118.
