This study considers how configurations of leadership practices impact perceptions of implementation during large-scale reform: implementation in the United States of Common Core State Standards. Comments of 951 respondents to a national teacher survey were examined. Analysis revealed the hybrid nature of leadership enactment with a range of leadership participation (RoLP) across hierarchical and heterachical structures. Findings detail how these leadership practices impacted teachers’ perceptions of educational reform. The RoLP model depicts how these practices might be spread across an organization.
AllenC. D.PenuelW. R. (2015). Studying teachers’ sensemaking to investigate teachers’ responses to professional development focused on new standards. Journal of Teacher Education, 66, 136–149.
2.
BallS.JunemannC. (2012). Networks, new governance and education. Bristol, England: Policy Press.
3.
BallS.MaguirM.BraunA. (2012). How schools do policy. London, England: Routledge.
4.
CamburnE. M.SpillaneJ. P.SebastianJ. (2010). Assessing the utility of a daily log for measuring principal leadership practice. Journal of Leadership for Effective and Equitable Organizations, 46, 707–737.
5.
CarlucciL.CaseJ. (2013). On the necessity of U-shaped learning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 5, 56–88. doi:10.1111/tops.12002
6.
CourtneyS. J.GunterH. M. (2015). Get off my bus! School leaders, vision work and the elimination of teachers. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 18, 395–417.
7.
DavisJ.ChoppinJ.McDuffieA. R.DrakeC. (2013). Common Core State Standards for mathematics. Rochester, NY: University of Rochester.
8.
DiamondJ. B.SpillaneJ. P. (2016). School leadership and management from a distributed perspective. Management in Education, 30, 147–154.
9.
DurandF. T.LawsonH. A.WilcoxK. C.SchillerK. S. (2016). The role of district office leaders in the adoption and implementation of the Common Core State Standards in elementary schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52, 45–74.
10.
EndacottJ. L.ColletV. S.GoeringC. Z.TurnerR.DennyG. S.WrightG.…DennyG. (2016). On the frontline of CCSS implementation: A national study of factors influencing teachers’ perceptions of teaching conditions and job satisfaction. Cogent Education, 3, 1162997.
11.
FinkD. (2011). Pipelines, pools and reservoirs: Building leadership capacity for sustained improvement. Journal of Educational Administration, 49, 670–684.
12.
GoerdelH. T. (2006). Taking initiative: Proactive management and organizational performance in networked environments. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 351–367.
13.
GreenleeB. J. (2008). Building teacher leadership capacity through educational leadership programs. Journal of Research for Educational Leaders, 4, 44–74.
14.
GronnP. (2008). The future of distributed leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 46, 141–158.
15.
GronnP. (2015). View from inside leadership configurations. Human Relations, 68, 545–560.
16.
HarrisA. (2008). Distributed leadership: According to the evidence. Journal of Educational Administration, 46, 172–188.
17.
HigginsJ.BonneL. (2011). Configurations of instructional leadership enactments that promote the teaching and learning of mathematics in a New Zealand elementary school. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 794–825.
18.
HopkinsM.SpillaneJ. P. (2015). Conceptualizing relations between instructional guidance infrastructure (IGI) and teachers’ beliefs about mathematics instruction. Journal of Educational Change, 16, 421–450.
19.
HopkinsM.SpillaneJ. P.JakopovicP.HeatonR. M. (2013). Infrastructure redesign and instructional reform in mathematics. The Elementary School Journal, 114, 200–224.
20.
HulpiaH.DevosG.Van KeerH. (2011). The relation between school leadership from a distributed perspective and teachers’ organizational commitment. Education Administration Quarterly, 47, 728–771.
21.
KingM. B.BouchardK. (2011). The capacity to build organizational capacity in schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 49, 653–669.
22.
LeithwoodK.MascallB.StraussT.SacksR.MemonN.YashkinaA. (2007). Distributing leadership to make schools smarter. Leadership & Policy in Schools, 6, 37–67.
23.
ManfredaK. L.BosnjakM.BerzelakJ.HaasI.VehovarV. (2008). Web surveys versus other survey modes: A meta-analysis comparing response rates. International Journal of Market Research, 50, 79–104.
24.
MathisW. (2013). Research-based options for education policymaking: Common Core State Standards. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center.
25.
MoolenaarN. M. (2012). A social network perspective on teacher collaboration in schools. American Journal of Education, 119, 7–39.
26.
MurphyA. F.TorffB. (2016, January). Growing pains: The effect of Common Core State Standards on perceived teacher effectiveness. The Educational Forum, 80, 21–33.
27.
ReihlenM.WerrA., (2012). Handbook of research on entrepreneurship in professional services (pp. 107–126). Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
28.
SebastianJ.AllensworthE. (2012). The Influence of principal leadership on classroom instruction and student learning. Education Administration Quarterly, 48, 626–663.
29.
SheppardB.BrownJ. (2014). Leadership for a new vision of public school classrooms. Journal of Educational Administration, 52, 84–96.
30.
SpillaneJ. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31.
SpillaneJ.HalversonR.DiamondJ. (2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 36, 3–34.
32.
TianM.RiskuM.CollinK. (2016). A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2013: Theory development, empirical evidence and future research focus. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44, 146–164.
33.
TownsendA. (2015). Leading school networks: Hybrid leadership in action?Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43, 719–737.
34.
Tschannen-MoranM.HoyA. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 944–956.
35.
UrickA. (2016). Examining US principal perception of multiple leadership styles used to practice shared instructional leadership. Journal of Educational Administration, 54, 152–172.
