Principals’ Schema: Leadership Philosophies and Instructional Leadership

Abstract

The Every Child Succeeds Act of 2015 signaled a shift toward the recognition of the importance of school leadership, reflecting a growing body of literature that demonstrates principals are second only to classroom instruction in supporting student success. This influence is the greatest when principals focus on teaching and learning, or instructional leadership. The ability to focus on instructional leadership requires knowledge, as well as the schema that creates mental models for instructional leadership tasks. This study draws on interviews with principals to examine the relationship between their theory of leadership, which are conceptualized as leadership schema, and their instructional leadership practices. The findings suggest that there are similarities in the instructional leadership tasks undertaken by principals, but that how they engage in tasks is partially determined by their theory of leadership.

Keywords

school leadership instructional leadership qualitative inquiry

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arum

(2000). Schools and communities: Ecological and institutional dimensions. Annual Review of Sociology , 26(1), 395–418.

Baard

S. K.

, Rench

T. A.

, & Kozlowski

S. W.

(2014). Performance adaptation: A theoretical integration and review. Journal of Management , 40(1), 48–99.

Barbuto

J. E.

, Jr., & Wheeler

D. W.

(2006). Scale development and construct clarification of servant leadership. Group & Organization Management , 31(3), 300–326.

Beattie

(2002). Educational leadership: Modeling, mentoring, making and re-making a learning community. European Journal of Teacher Education , 25(2–3), 199–221.

Black

G. L.

(2010). Correlational analysis of servant leadership and school climate. Journal of Catholic Education , 13(4), 437–466. https://dx-doi-org.web.bisu.edu.cn/10.15365/joce.1304032013

Blase

, & Blase

(1996). Facilitative school leadership and teacher empowerment: Teacher’s perspective. Social Psychology of Education , 1(2), 117–145.

Boiral

, Talbot

, & Paillé

(2015). Leading by example: A model of organizational citizenship behavior for the environment. Business Strategy and the Environment , 24(6), 532–550.

Bolden

(2011). Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews , 13(3), 251–269.

Brower

H. H.

, Schoorman

F. D.

, & Tan

H. H.

(2000). A model of relational leadership: The integration of trust and leader-member exchange. Leadership Quarterly , 11(2), 227–250.

10.

Cross

S. E.

, & Markus

H. R.

(1994). Self-schemas, possible selves, and competent performance. Journal of Educational Psychology , 86(3), 423–438.

11.

Cunliffe

A. L.

, & Eriksen

(2011). Relational leadership. Human Relations , 64(11), 1425–1449.

12.

Cunningham

R. L.

(2008). An examination of the relationship between servant-leadership behavior of the elementary school principal, school climate and student achievement as measured by the 4th grade Mathematics and Reading Michigan Educational Assessment Program [Doctoral dissertation] . Eastern Michigan University. https://commons.emich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1138&context=theses

13.

Day

, Jacobson

S. L.

, & Johansson

(2011). Leading organizational learning and capacity building. In R. M. Ylimaki & S. L. Jacobson (Eds.), US and cross-national policies, practices, and preparation (pp. 29–49). Springer.

14.

Eisenkopf

(2020). Words and deeds–Experimental evidence on leading-by-example. The Leadership Quarterly , 31(4), 1–12.

15.

Elmore

R. F.

(2000). Building a new structure for school leadership . Albert Shanker Institute. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED546618.pdf

16.

Entwisle

D. R.

, & Astone

N. M.

(1994). Some practical guidelines for measuring youth’s race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Child Development , 65(6), 1521–1540.

17.

Eva

, Robin

, Sendjaya

, Van Dierendonck

, & Liden

R. C.

(2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly , 30(1), 111–132.

18.

Fletcher

J. K.

, & Kaeufer

(2003). Shared leadership: Paradox and possibility. In C. Pearce & J. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Current thinking, future trends (pp. 21–47). SAGE Publications.

19.

Fullan

, & Quinn

(2016). Coherence . Corwin Press.

20.

Graham

(1991). A review of attribution theory in achievement contexts. Educational Psychology Review , 3(1), 5–39.

21.

Greenleaf

(1970). The servant as leader . Robert K. Greenleaf Center.

22.

Grissom

J. A.

, Loeb

, & Master

(2013). Effective instructional time use for school leaders: Longitudinal evidence from observations of principals. Educational Researcher , 42(8), 433–444.

23.

Guest

, MacQueen

K. M.

, & Namey

E. E.

(Eds.). (2012). Validity and reliability (credibility and dependability) in qualitative research and data analysis. In Applied thematic analysis (pp. 79–106). SAGE Publications.

24.

Hallinger

, Gümüş

, & Bellibaş

M. Ş.

(2020). “Are principals instructional leaders yet?” A science map of the knowledge base on instructional leadership, 1940–2018. Scientometrics , 122(3), 1629–1650.

25.

Hallinger

, & Murphy

J. F.

(1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal , 86(2), 217–247.

26.

Hallinger

, & Murphy

J. F.

(2013). Running on empty? Finding the time and capacity to lead learning. NASSP Bulletin , 97(1), 5–21.

27.

Harris

(2008). Distributed leadership: According to the evidence. Journal of Educational Administration , 46(2), 172–188.

28.

Harris

, Leithwood

, Day

, Sammons

, & Hopkins

(2007). Distributed leadership and organizational change: Reviewing the evidence. Journal of Educational Change , 8(4), 337–347.

29.

Heck

R. H.

, Larsen

T. J.

, & Marcoulides

G. A.

(1990). Instructional leadership and school achievement: Validation of a causal model. Educational Administration Quarterly , 26(2), 94–125.

30.

Hord

(1992). Facilitative leadership: The imperative for change . Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED370217.pdf

31.

Kellar

, & Slayton

(2016). Fostering and achieving organizational change: A framework for studying the complexities of school leadership. Journal of School Leadership , 26(4), 690–715.

32.

Kelly

S. E.

(2013). Qualitative interviewing techniques and styles. In I. L. Bourgeault, R. De Vries, & R. Dingwall (Eds.), The sage handbook of qualitative methods in health research (pp. 307–326). SAGE Publications. http://sk.sagepub.com/reference/sage-hdbk-qualitative-methods-in-health-research/n17.xml

33.

Klar

H. W.

(2012). Fostering distributed instructional leadership: A sociocultural perspective of leadership development in urban high schools. Leadership and Policy in Schools , 11(4), 365–390.

34.

Lacroix

, & Verdorfer

A. P.

(2017). Can servant leaders fuel the leadership fire? The relationship between servant leadership and followers’ leadership avoidance. Administrative Sciences , 7(1), 6.

35.

Lawson

H. A.

, Durand

F. T.

, Wilcox

K. C.

, Gregory

K. M.

, Schiller

K. S.

, & Zuckerman

S. J.

(2017). The role of district and school leaders’ trust and communications in the simultaneous implementation of innovative policies. Journal of School Leadership , 27(1), 31–67.

36.

Leithwood

(2016). Department-head leadership for school improvement. Leadership and Policy in Schools , 15(2), 117–140.

37.

Leithwood

, & Azah

V. N.

(2017). Characteristics of high-performing school districts. Leadership and Policy in Schools , 16(1), 27–53.

38.

Leithwood

, Harris

, & Hopkins

(2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership and Management , 28(1), 27–42.

39.

Leithwood

, Louis

K. S.

, Anderson

, & Wahlstrom

(2004). Review of research: How leadership influences student learning . The Wallace Foundation.

40.

Louis

K. S.

, Leithwood

, Wahlstrom

, & Anderson

(2010). Investigating the links to improved student learning . Wallace Foundation.

41.

Louis

K. S.

, Murphy

, & Smylie

(2016). Caring leadership in schools: Findings from exploratory analyses. Educational Administration Quarterly , 52(2), 310–348.

42.

Martin

, Guillaume

, Thomas

, Lee

, & Epitropaki

(2016). Leader–member exchange (LMX) and performance: A meta analytic review. Personnel Psychology , 69(1), 67–121.

43.

McBrayer

J. S.

, Jackson

, Pannell

S. S.

, Sorgen

C. H.

, De Blume

A. P. G.

, & Melton

T. D.

(2018). Balance of instructional and managerial tasks as it relates to school leaders’ self-efficacy. Journal of School Leadership , 28(5), 596–617.

44.

McCormick

, & Martinko

(2004). Identifying leader social cognitions: Integrating the causal reasoning perspective into social cognitive theory. Journal of Leadership and Organization Studies , 10(4), 2–11.

45.

Metz

, Piro

J. S.

, Nitowski

, & Cosentino

(2019). Transformational leadership: Perceptions of building-level leaders. Journal of School Leadership , 29(5), 389–408.

46.

Miles

M. B.

, Huberman

A. M.

, & Saldaña

(2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook . SAGE Publications.

47.

Mireles-Rios

, & Becchio

J. A.

(2018). The evaluation process, administrator feedback, and teacher self-efficacy. Journal of School Leadership , 28(4), 462–487.

48.

Neumerski

C. M.

(2013). Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: What do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here? Educational Administration Quarterly , 49(2), 310–347.

49.

Price

H. E.

(2012). Principal–teacher interactions: How affective relationships shape principal and teacher attitudes. Educational Administration Quarterly , 48(1), 39–85.

50.

Price

H. E.

(2015). School leadership in urban schools how social-relational leadership shapes teacher engagement. In M. Khalifa, N. Witherspoon Arnold, A. F. Osanloo, & C. M. Grant (Eds.), Handbook of urban educational leadership (pp. 426–440). Rowman & Littlefield.

51.

, Janssen

, & Shi

(2015). Transformational leadership and follower creativity: The mediating role of follower relational identification and the moderating role of leader creativity expectations. The Leadership Quarterly , 26(2), 286–299.

52.

Reitzug

U. C.

, West

D. L.

, & Angel

(2008). Conceptualizing instructional leadership: The voices of principals. Education and Urban Society , 40(6), 694–714.

53.

Robinson

, Lloyd

, & Rowe

(2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly , 44(5), 635–674.

54.

Russell

R. F.

, & Stone

G. A.

(2002). A review of servant leadership attributes: Developing a practical model. Leadership & Organization Development Journal , 23(3), 145–157.

55.

Senge

P. M.

(2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization . Currency.

56.

Shaked

(2018). Why principals sidestep instructional leadership: The disregarded question of schools’ primary objective. Journal of School Leadership , 28(4), 517–538.

57.

Shaw

, & Newton

(2014). Teacher retention and satisfaction with a servant leader as principal. Education , 135(1), 101–106.

58.

Smylie

M. A.

, Mayrowetz

, Murphy

, & Seashore Louis

(2007). Trust and the development of distributed leadership. Journal of School Leadership , 17(4), 469–503.

59.

Spears

L. C.

(2010). Character and servant leadership: Ten characteristics of effective, caring leaders. The Journal of Virtues & Leadership , 1(1), 25–30.

60.

Spillane

J. P.

, & Burch

(2006). The institutional environment and instructional practice: Changing patterns of guidance and control in public education. In H. D. Meyer & B. Rowan (Eds.), The new institutionalism in education (pp. 87–102). State University of New York Press.

61.

Spillane

J. P.

, Halverson

, & Diamond

J. B.

(2004). Towards a theory of leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies , 36(1), 3–34.

62.

Supovitz

J. A.

, & Tognatta

(2013). The impact of distributed leadership on collaborative team decision making. Leadership and Policy in Schools , 12(2), 101–121.

63.

Thompson

, & Glasø

(2015). Situational leadership theory: A test from three perspectives. Leadership & Organization Development Journal , 36(5), 527–544.

64.

Tschannen-Moran

, & Gareis

C. R.

(2015). Faculty trust in the principal: An essential ingredient in high-performing schools. Journal of Educational Administration , 53(1), 66–92.

65.

Uhl-Bien

(2006). Relational Leadership Theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly , 17(6), 654–676.

66.

Urick

(2016). Examining US principal perception of multiple leadership styles used to practice shared instructional leadership. Journal of Educational Administration , 54(2), 152–172.

67.

Van Dierendonck

(2011). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of Management , 37(4), 1228–1261.

68.

Versland

T. M.

, & Erickson

J. L.

(2017). Leading by example: A case study of the influence of principal self-efficacy on collective efficacy. Cogent Education , 4(1), 1–17.

69.

Wahlstrom

K. L.

, & Louis

K. S.

(2008). How teachers experience principal leadership: The roles of professional community, trust, efficacy, and shared responsibility. Educational Administration Quarterly , 44(4), 458–495.

70.

Watt

W. M.

(2009). Facilitative social change leadership theory: 10 recommendations towards effective leadership. Journal of Leadership Education , 8(2), 50–71.

71.

Yin

R. K.

(2014). Case study research: Design and methods . SAGE Publications.

72.

Yin

, & Schmeidler

P. J.

(2009). Why do standardized ISO 14001 environmental management systems lead to heterogeneous environmental outcomes? Business Strategy and the Environment , 18(7), 469–486.

73.

Zuckerman

S. J.

, Wilcox

K. C.

, Durand

F. T.

, Lawson

H. A.

, & Schiller

K. S.

(2017). Drivers for Change: A Study of Distributed Leadership and Performance Adaptation during Policy Innovation Implementation. Leadership and Policy in Schools , 17(4), 618–646.