The Texas Assessment of Academic Skills (TAAS) is a classic case of the high-stakes test, accompanied by rewards for high performing schools and sanctions for lower performing schools. In this study, over 100 teachers from Texas school districts completed open-ended surveys on how they prepare students for TAAS and the effects of the test on students, teachers, and schools. Twenty of the survey respondents engaged in interviews to gather in-depth data on their perceptions of TAAS. Results provide preliminary indications that, for many schools, high-stakes testing has become the object rather than the measure of teaching and learning, with negative side effects on curriculum, teacher decision making, instruction, student learning, school climate, and teacher and student self-concept and motivation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BernhardtV. L.1994. “The School Portfolio,”Eye on Education, Princeton, NJ.
2.
BirkmireK. J.1993. Ninth Grade Proficiency, Is It the Best Measure of Learning: A Survey of Teacher Attitudes, (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 361 406).
3.
BrandtR.1989. “On Misuse of Testing: A Conversation with George Madaus,”Educational Leadership, 46(7): 26–29.
4.
BrownD. F.1993. “The Political Influence of State Testing Reform Through the Eyes of Principals and Teachers,” paper presented at The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, Atlanta, GA.
5.
CorbettH. D., and WilsonB. L.1989. “Statewide Testing and Local Improvement: An Oxymoron?”Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools.
6.
Darling-HammondL.1991. “The Implications of Testing Policy for Quality and Equality,”Phi Delta Kappan, 73(3): 220–225.
7.
Darling-HammondL., and WiseA. E.1985. “Beyond Standardization: State Standards and School Improvement,”The Elementary School Journal, 85(3): 315–336.
8.
GilmanD. A., and ReynoldsL. L.1991. “The Side Effects of Statewide Testing,”Contemporary Education, 62(4): 273–278.
9.
HolmanL. J.1996. “An Examination of Predictors of Prior Criterion-Referenced Test Status, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status for At-Risk Students on the Exit Level Administration of a High-Stakes, Criterion-Referenced Test,” paper presented at The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
10.
HolmanL. J.1995a, April. “Impact of Ethnicity, Class, and Gender on Achievement of Border Area Students on High-Stakes Examination,” paper presented at The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
11.
HolmanL. J.1995b, October. “An Examination of Predictors of Prior Criterion Referenced Test Status, Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Status for the At-Risk Student on a Criterion-Referenced, High Stakes Test,” paper presented at The Rocky Mountain Educational Research Association Conference, Albuquerque, NM.
12.
HolmanL. J.1994. “An Examination of Potential Dissonance between State Mandated Testing Programs and Certain Philosophies Underlying Second Language Acquisition,” paper presented at The Arizona Educational Research Association/Rocky Mountain Educational Research Association Annual Fall Conference, Tempe, AZ.
13.
IvoryG.1993, March. “Investigating Ethnic Bias in the Mathematics Portion of the Exit-Level Texas Assessment of Academic Skills,” paper presented at The Annual Texas Test Conference, Austin, TX, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 362 574).
14.
MadausG. F.1988. “The Influences of Testing on the Curriculum,” in Critical Issues in Curriculum: Eighty-seventh Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, TannerL. N., ed., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 83–121.
15.
MedinaN. J., and NeillD. M.1990. “Fallout From the Testing Explosion: How 100 Million Standardized Exams Undermine Equity and Excellence in America's Public Schools (3rd Edition),”Cambridge, MA: Fair Test (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 319 749).
16.
NeillD. M., and MedinaN. J.1989. “Standardized Testing: Harmful to Educational Health,”Phi Delta Kappan, 70(9): 688–697.
17.
NolenS. B., HaladynaT. M., and HaasN.1992. “Uses and Abuses of Achievement Test Scores,”Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 11(2): 9–15.
18.
PattonM. Q.1990. Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
19.
SykesG., and ElmoreR.1989. “Making Schools Manageable,” in The Politics of Reforming School Administration, HannawayJ., and CrowsonR., eds., Philadelphia: Falmer.
