The proliferation of Web 2.0 technologies has made it possible for teachers to create a variety of engaging online learning activities for students of all ages. However, for students with learning disabilities, the prospect of having to search, read, and analyze information online can be overwhelming. This article reviews a variety of tools and techniques that teachers can use to help make online learning more manageable for students with disabilities. These free tools focus on removing the clutter and distractions often found online and helping direct student attention towards the relevant content.
Beacham, B. ( 1994). Making connections: Transforming ivory towers and little red school houses. In J. Willis, B. Robin, & D. A. Willis (Eds.), Technology and teacher education annual 1994. Charlottesville, VA: Association for Advancement of Computing in Education.
2.
Becker, H.J. ( 2000). Who’s wired and who’s not: Children’s access to and use of computer technology. The Future of Children: Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 44-75.
3.
Becker, H.J., & Ravitz, J. ( 1999). The influence of computer and internet use on teachers’ pedagogical practices and perceptions. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(4), 356-384.
4.
Cuban, L. ( 1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
5.
Duffield, J.A. ( 1997). Trials, tribulations, and minor successes: Integrating technology into a preservice preparation program. Tech Trends , 42(4), 22-26.
6.
Goldberg, A., Russell, M., & Cook, A. ( 2003). The effect of computers on student writing: A meta-analysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 2(1), 3-51.
7.
Grossen, B., & Carnine, D. ( 1990). Diagramming a logic strategy: Effects on difficult problem types and transfer. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 13(3), 168-182.
8.
Hasselbring, T.S., & Williams-Glaser, C.H. (2000). Use of computer technology to help students with special needs. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 102-122.
9.
Keates, S., Clarkson, P.J., & Robinson, P. ( 2002). Developing a practical inclusive interface approach. Interacting With Computers, 14, 271-299.
10.
Lan, J. ( 2000). Leading teacher educators to a new paradigm: Observations on technology integration. AACTE Briefs, 21(10), 4-6.
11.
MacArthur, C.A. ( 1996). Using technology to enhance the writing processes of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 29, 344-354.
12.
Michigan Department of Education. (2007). Michigan merit curriculum: Online experience. Lansing: Author.
13.
Myers, J., & Beach, R. ( 2004). Constructing critical literacy practices through technology tools and inquiry. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 4(3). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol4/iss3/languagearts/article1.cfm
14.
Nicolaou, C.T., Nicolaidou, I.A., Zacharia, Z.C., & Constantinou, C.P. (2007). Enhancing fourth graders’ ability to interpret graphical representations through the use of microcomputer-based labs implemented within an inquiry-based activity sequence. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 26(1), 75-99.
15.
Norris, C., Sullivan, T., Poirot, J., & Soloway, E. ( 2003). No access, no use, no impact: Snapshot surveys of educational technology in K-12. Journal of Research on Technology in Education , 36(1), 15-27.
16.
Office of Technology Assessment. (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection (No. OTA-EHR-616). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
17.
Page, M. ( 2002). Technology-enriched classrooms: Effects on students of low socio-economic status. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(4), 389-409.
18.
Prensky, M. ( 2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.
19.
Ryba, K., Selby, L., & Nolan, P. ( 1995). Computers empower students with special needs. Educational Leadership International, 53(2), 82-84.
20.
Schacter, J. ( 1999). The impact of education technology on student achievement: What the most current research has to say. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Education Technology.
21.
Shneiderman, B. ( 2000). Universal usability: Pushing human-computer interaction research to empower every citizen. Communication of the ACM , 43(5), 84-91.
