The IEP can be an invaluable part of a child's education-if it is responsive to the child's true needs
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arter, J.A., & Jenkins, J.R. (1979). Differential diagnosis-prescriptive teaching: A critical approach. Review of Educational Research, 49, 517–555.
2.
Cambourne, B. (1988). The whole story. New York: Scholastic.
3.
Blankenship, C.S. (1985). Using curriculum-based assessment data to make instructional decisions. Exceptional Children, 52, 233–238.
4.
Church, S., & Newman, J.M. (1986). Danny. A case history of an instructionally induced reoding problem. In J.M. Newman (Ed.), Whole language, theory and practice. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
5.
Dudley-Marling, C. (1985). Perceptions of the usefulness of the IEP by teachers of the learning disabled and emotionally disturbed children. Psychology in the Schools, 22, 65–67.
6.
Dudley-Marling, C. (1986). Assessing the written language development of learning disabled children: An holistic perspective. Canadian Journal of Special Education, 2(1), 33–43.
7.
Dudley-Marling, C. (1988). Assessing the reading and writing development of learning disabled students: An holistic approach. B.C. Journal of Special Education, 12(1), 41–51.
8.
Eisner, E.W. (1979). The educational imagination. New York: Basic Books.
Goldstein, S., Strickland, B., Turnbull, A.P., & Curry, L. (1980). An observational analysis of the IEP conference. Exceptional Children, 46, 278–286.
11.
Goodman, K.S. (1982). Revaluing readers and reading. Topics in Learning and Learning Disabilities, 1 (4), 87–93.
12.
Goodman, Y., Watson, D., & Burke, C. (19B7). Reading miscue inventory: Alternative procedures. New York: Richard C. Owen.
13.
Graves, D. (1990, July). Portfolios help us rethink assessment. Paper presented at the International Reading Association's 35th Annual Convention, Atlanta.
14.
Guba, E.G., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1981). Effective evoluation: Improving the usefulness of evaluation results through responsive and naturalistic approaches. San Francisco: Jassey-Bass.
15.
Heshusius, L. (1989). The Newtonian-mechanistic paradigm, special education, and contours of alternatives. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 403–415.
16.
Heshusius, L. (1991). Curriculum-based assessment and direct instruction: Critical reflections on fundamental assumptions. Exceptional Children, 57, 315–328.
17.
Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, G.S. (1984). Wide range achievement test-Revised. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.
18.
Kaufman, A.S., & Kaufman, N.L. (1985). Kaufman test of educational achievement. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
19.
Lusthaus, C.S., Lusthaus, E.W., & Gibbs, H. (1981). Parents' role in the decision process. Exceptional Children, 48, 256–257.
20.
Lynch, E.C., & Beare, P.L. (1990). The quality of IEP objectives and their relevance to instruction for students with mental retardation and behavioral disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 11(2), 48–55.
21.
Margolis, H., & Truesdell, L. (19S7). Do special education teachers use IEPs to guide instruction?The Urban Review, 19, 151–159.
22.
Markwardt, F.C. (1989). Peabody individual achievement test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
23.
Poplin, M. (1988). Holistic/constructivist principles of the teaching/learning process: Implications for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 401–416.
24.
Reif, L. (1990). Finding the value in education: Self-assessment in a middle school classroom. Educational Leadership. 47(6), 24–29.
25.
Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J.E. (1988). Assessment in special and remedial education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
26.
Smith, S.W. (1990). Comparison of individualized education programs (IEPs) of students with behavioral disorders and learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 24, 85–100.
27.
Stake, R.E. (Ed.). (1975). Evaluating the arts in education: A responsive approach. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
28.
Turbill, J. (1990, July). The theory of responsive evaluation: Where has it come from?Paper presented at the International Reading Association's 35th Annual Convention, Atlanta.
29.
Valencia, S.W., & Pearson, P.D. (1988). Principles for classroom comprehension assessment. Remedial and Special Education, 9(1), 26–35.
30.
Weaver, C. (1982). Welcoming errors as signs of growth. Language Arts, 59, 438–444.
31.
Weaver, C. (1988). Reading process and practice. From sociopsycholinguistics to whole language. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
32.
Wilcox, T. (1984, July). Evaluating programs for native students: A responsive strategy. Paper presented at the Mokakit Indian Education Research Association's International Conference, London, Ontario, Canada.