Describes curriculum efforts as a result of two major federal initiatives
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3.
Education of the Handicapped Act Amendments of 1990, 20 U.S.C. sT 1400.
4.
Eichelberger, R. T. (1989). Disciplined inquiry: Understanding and doing research.New York: Longman.
5.
Field, S., & Hoffman, A. (1992). Steps to self-determination (field-test version).Detroit: Wayne State University, Developmental Disabilities Institute/College of Education.
6.
Field, S., & Hoffman, A. (1994). Development of a model for self-determination. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 17(2), 159–169.
7.
Field, S., Hoffman, A., St. Peter, S., & Sawilowsky, S. (1992a). Effects of disability labels on teachers' perceptions of students' self-determination. Perceptual Motor Skills, 75, 931–934.
8.
Field, S., Hoffman, A., St. Peter, S., & Sawilowsky, S. (1992b). Skills and knowledge for self-determination: Interim research report.Detroit: Wayne State University.
9.
Gordon, R. L. (1977). Unidimensional scoling of social variables: Concepts and procedures.New York: free Press.
10.
Johnson, D., Johnson, R., Holubec, E., & Roy, P. (1984). Circles of learning.Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
11.
Kerr, M., & Bowen, M. (1988). Family evaluation.New York: Norton.
12.
Nunnolly, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. (2nd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
13.
Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1992, 2, 29, U.S.C. sT 701.
14.
Schloss, P., Alper, S., & Jayne, D. (1994). Self-determination for persons with disabilities: Choice, risk, and dignity. Exceptional Children, 60, 215–225.
15.
Travers, R. M. (1978). An introduction to educational research.New York: Macmillan.
