The purpose of this qualitative study was to understand themes of parent-identified benefits and barriers to using math activities in the home setting. Specifically, parents of seven 4- to 5-year-old children with disabilities implemented math activities with their child for 3 weeks and provided feedback via logs and interviews. This served as an initial step toward identifying barriers to existing materials and iteratively developing a new, inclusive home math intervention. We used open coding to identify themes. Two benefit themes ((a) Improvements to the Child’s Behavior and Content Knowledge, (b) Increased Math Talk), three barrier themes ((a) Behavior Management Impedes Content Learning, (b) Lack of Confidence in Content and Teaching, (c) Factors Outside of the Study Impacts Capacity to Engage) and three recommendation themes were identified ((a) Prioritize Child Engagement, (b) Provide Explicit Instruction During Training, and (c) Prioritize Convenience and Ease). These themes offer insight into challenges with existing commercially available materials for families of children with disabilities, and future directions for the development of inclusive mathematics interventions.
Altindag KumasO.Sardohan YıldırımA. E. (2024). Development of early numeracy skills in children with moderate intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 28(2), 343–358.
2.
BanksJ.GonzálezT.MuellerC.PachecoM.ScottL. A.TrainorA. A. (2023). Reflexive quality criteria: Questions and indicators for purpose‑driven special education qualitative research. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 449–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029231169312
3.
BerkowitzT.SchaefferM. W.MaloneyE. A.PetersonL.GregorC.LevineS. C.BeilockS. L. (2015). Math at home adds up to achievement in school. Science, 350(6257), 196–198. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac7427
4.
ChaiZ.Lieberman-BetzR. (2016). Strategies for helping parents of young children address challenging behaviors in the home. Teaching Exceptional Children, 48(4), 186–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059915621754
5.
ChanJ. Y. C.NagashimaT.ClosserA. H. (2023). Participatory design for cognitive science: Examples from the learning sciences and human− computer interaction. Cognitive Science, 47(10), Article e13365.
6.
DaucourtM. C.NapoliA. R.QuinnJ. M.WoodS. G.HartS. A. (2021). The home math environment and math achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 147(6), 565–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000330
7.
De ChambrierA. F.BayeA.Tinnes-VigneM.TazoutiY.VlassisJ.PonceletD.GiauqueN.FagnantA.LuxenbourgerC.AuquiereA.KergerS.DierendonckC. (2021). Enhancing children’s numerical skills through a play-based intervention at kindergarten and at home: A quasi-experimental study. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 54, 164–178.
8.
DiamondL. L.McCartneyC. M. (2022). Developmentally appropriate practice. Routledge.
DuPaulG. J.CleminshawC. L. (2020). Principles and practices that promote positive guidance in early childhood. In AlfonsoV. C.DuPaulG. J. (Eds.), Healthy development in young children: Evidence-based interventions for early education (pp. 193–210). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000197-010
11.
EasonS. H.ScaliseN. R.BerkowitzT.RamaniG. B.LevineS. C. (2022). Widening the lens of family math engagement: A conceptual framework and systematic review. Developmental Review, 66, 101046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2022.101046
12.
FongJ. P.SutherlandM.NelsonG. (2025). Engaging caregivers of students with disabilities in home math activities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 57(5), 326–336.
13.
GerstenR.ChardD. J.JayanthiM.BakerS. K.MorphyP.FlojoJ. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79(3), 1202–1242.
14.
GibsonD. J.GundersonE. A.LevineS. C. (2020). Causal effects of parent number talk on preschoolers’ number knowledge. Child Development, 91(6), Article e1162–e1177.
15.
HendrixN. M.HojnoskiR. L.MissallK. N. (2019). Shared book reading to promote math talk in parent–child dyads in low-income families. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 39(1), 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121419831762
16.
HojnoskiR. L.CaskieG. I.Miller YoungR. (2018). Early numeracy trajectories: Baseline performance levels and growth rates in young children by disability status. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 37(4), 206–218.
17.
JimenezB. A.KemmeryM. (2013). Building the early numeracy skills of students with moderate intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48(4), 479–490.
18.
KorirW. (2017). Influence of number of siblings and learning resources at home on students’ academic performance. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 8(6), 291–299.
19.
LehrlS.EbertS.BlaurockS.RossbachH.-G.WeinertS. (2020). Long-term and domain-specific relations between the early years home learning environment and students’ academic outcomes in secondary school. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(1), 102–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2019.1618346
20.
LeyvaD.LibertusM. E.McGregorR. (2023). Math intervention targeting family routines increases parental math talk and math activities. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 89, 101595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2023.101595
21.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
22.
MaloneyE. A.RamirezG.GundersonE. A.LevineS. C.BeilockS. L. (2015). Intergenerational effects of parents’ math anxiety on children’s math achievement and anxiety. Psychological Science, 26(9), 1480–1488.
23.
MayerS. E.KalilA.DelgadoW.LiuH.RuryD.ShahR. (2023). Boosting parent-child math engagement and preschool children’s math skills: Evidence from an RCT with low-income families. Economics of Education Review, 95, 102436.
24.
MyttonJ.IngramJ.MannsS.ThomasJ. (2014). Facilitators and barriers to engagement in parenting programs: A qualitative systematic review. Health Education & Behavior, 41(2), 127–137.
25.
NapoliA. R.PurpuraD. J. (2018). The home literacy and numeracy environment in preschool: Cross-domain relations of parent–child practices and child outcomes. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 166, 581–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.10.002
26.
NelsonG.CarterH.BoedekerP.KnowlesE.BuckmillerC.EamesJ. (2024). A meta-analysis and quality review of mathematics interventions conducted in informal learning environments with caregivers and children. Review of Educational Research, 94(1), 112–152. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543231156182
27.
NiklasF.CohrssenC.TaylerC. (2016). Parents supporting learning: A non-intensive intervention supporting literacy and numeracy in the home learning environment. International Journal of Early Years Education, 24(2), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2016.1155147
28.
O’NionsE.HappéF.EversK.BoonenH.NoensI. (2018). How do parents manage irritability, challenging behaviour, non-compliance and anxiety in children with autism spectrum disorders? A meta-synthesis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(4), 1272–1286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3361-4
29.
OswaldT. M.BeckJ. S.IosifA. M.McCauleyJ. B.GilhoolyL. J.MatterJ. C.SolomonM. (2016). Clinical and cognitive characteristics associated with mathematics problem solving in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research, 9(4), 480–490.
30.
OuthwaiteL. A.FischerN. M.JusekA. S.Van HerwegenJ. (2025). Understanding the role of parental self-efficacy for supporting children’s early learning in the home mathematics environment. Early Child Development and Care, 195(9–10), 793–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2025.2474668
31.
PurpuraD. J.SchmittS. A.NapoliA. R.Dobbs-OatesJ.KingY. A.HornburgC. B.WesterbergL.BorrielloG. A.BryantL. M.AnayaL. Y.KungM.LitkowskiE.LinJ.RolanE. (2021). Engaging caregivers and children in picture books: A family-implemented mathematical language intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(7), 1338–1353. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000662
32.
RamaniG. B.RoweM. L.EasonS. H.LeechK. A. (2015). Math talk during informal learning activities in Head Start families. Cognitive Development, 35, 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2014.11.002
33.
RanzatoE.TolmieA.Van HerwegenJ. (2021). The home learning environment of primary school children with down syndrome and those with Williams syndrome. Brain Sciences, 11(6), 733–742.
34.
SaldañaJ. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (pp. 1–440). Sage.
35.
SarmanA.TuncayS. (2024). Problems experienced by families of children with disabilities and nursing approaches. In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of disability (pp. 1–13). Springer Nature Switzerland.
36.
ScaliseN. R.DaubertE. N.RamaniG. B. (2017). Narrowing the early mathematics gap: A play-based intervention to promote low-income preschoolers’ number skills. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 3(3), 559–581.
37.
SchaefferM. W.RozekC. S.BerkowitzT.LevineS. C.BeilockS. L. (2018). Disassociating the relation between parents’ math anxiety and children’s math achievement: Long-term effects of a math app intervention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(12), 1782–1790. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000490
38.
SchwandtT. A.LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (2007). Judging interpretations: But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 2007(114), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.223
39.
SonS.-H. C.HurJ. H. (2020). Parental math talk during home cooking and math skills in Head Start children: The role of task management talk. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 34(3), 406–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2019.1704318
40.
SonnenscheinS.MetzgerS.DowlingR.GayB.SimonsC. (2016). Extending an effective classroom-based math board game intervention to preschoolers’ homes. Journal of Applied Research on Children: Informing Policy for Children at Risk, 7(2), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.58464/2155-5834.1304
41.
StahlS.KingK. (2020). Establishing rigor and trustworthiness in qualitative research. Qualitative Research in Education, 9(2), 156–178. https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.2020.4686
42.
TitecaD.RoeyersH.LoeysT.CeulemansA.DesoeteA. (2015). Mathematical abilities in elementary school children with autism spectrum disorder. Infant and Child Development, 24(6), 606–623.
43.
TracyS. J. (2010). Qualitative quality: Eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(10), 837–851. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800410383121
44.
TracyS. J. (2017). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
