Contact Theory as a Framework for Experiential Activities as Diversity Education: An Exploratory Study

Abstract

Participation in experiential education is said to enhance people's appreciation for diversity. This article reports on a study that found significant changes in participants' attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors following a nonformal diversity education program using adventure-based and community-service activities. Additionally, hypothesized program conditions, as outlined by contact theory, were significantly predictive of outcomes, although majority and minority participants differed on their perceptions of these conditions. These findings suggest that experiential activities may be considered a viable approach to diversity education in nonformal settings, assuming key conditions are met. Implications for practice and directions for future research are discussed.

Keywords

Contact Theory Experiential Education Diversity Adventure Education Community Service

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AEE. (n.d.). AEE Definition of Experiential Education. Retrieved November 22, 2005, from http://www.aee.org/faq/nfaq.htm#ee.

Baldwin

Persing

Magnuson

(2004). The role of theory, research, and evaluation in adventure education. Journal of Experiential Education, 25(3), 167–183.

Banks

(1999). An introduction to multicultural education (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Billig

(2000). Research on K-12 school-based service-learning: The evidence builds. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(9), 658–664.

Blanchett

W. J.

Mumford

Beachum

(2005). Urban school failure and disproportionality in a post-Brown era: Benign neglect of the constitutional rights of students of color. Remedial and Special Education, 26(2), 70–81.

Cohen

(1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Dewey

(1916). Democracy and education. New York: Free Press.

Fuertes

J. N.

Miville

M. I.

Mohr

J. J.

Sedlacek

W. E.

Gretchen

(2000). Factor structure and short form of the Miville-Guzman Universality-Diversity Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 33(3), 157–169.

Glass

J. S.

Benshoff

J. M.

(2002). Facilitating group cohesion among adolescents through challenge course experiences. Journal of Experiential Education, 25(2), 268–277.

10.

Grandstaff

(1976). Nonformal education: Some indications for use. Comparative Education Review, 20(3), 294–304.

11.

Green

C. W.

Adams

A. F.

Turner

C. W.

(1988). Development and validation of the School Interracial Climate Scale. American Journal of Community Psychology, 16(2), 241–259.

12.

Green

D. P.

Wong

J. S.

(2008). Tolerance and the contact hypothesis: A field experiment. Unpublished manuscript, Yale University New Haven, CT.

13.

Gunaratnam

(2003). Researching ‘race’ and ethnicity: Methods, knowledge and power. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

14.

Hersman

B. L.

(2007). The effects of adventure education on the social interactions of students with disabilities in general physical education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University Columbus.

15.

Jastrzab

Giodorno

Chase

Valente

Hazlett

LaRock

J.R.

(2007). Serving country and community: A longitudinal study of service in AmeriCorps. Washington, DC: Corporation for National and Community Service.

16.

Kees

(2003). Creating safe learning environments. In Timpson

W. M.

Canetto

S. S.

Borrayo

E. A.

Yang

(Eds.), Teaching diversity: Challenges and complexities, identities and integrity (pp. 55–64). Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.

17.

Lee

(2003). Why we need to re-think race and ethnicity in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 3–5.

18.

Lutz

B. F.

(2005). Post Brown vs. the Board of Education: The effects of the end of court-ordered desegregation (Staff working paper in the Finance and Economics Discussion Series No. 2005–64). Washington, DC: U.S. Federal Reserve Board.

19.

Marcus-Newhall

Heindl

T. R.

(1998). Coping with interracial stress in ethnically diverse classrooms: How imprtant are Allport's contact conditions? Journal of Social Issues, 54(4), 813–830.

20.

Mattison

Aber

M. S.

(2007). Closing the achievement gap: The association of racial climate with achievement and behavioral outcomes. American Journal of Community Psychology, 40(1), 1–12.

21.

McDermott

K. A.

Bruno

Varghese

(2002). Have Connecticut's desegregation policies produced desegregation? Equity and Excellence in Education, 35(1), 18–27.

22.

McKown

(2005). Applying ecological theory to advance the science and practice of school-based prejudice reduction interventions. Educational Psychologist, 40(3), 177–189.

23.

Muthuswamy

Levine

T. R.

Gazel

(2006). Interaction-based diversity initiative outcomes: An evaluation of an initiative aimed at bridging the racial divide on a college campus. Communication Education, 55(1), 105–121.

24.

Nagda

B. A.

Tropp

L. A.

Paluck

E. L.

(2006). Looking back as we look ahead: Integrating research, theory, and practice on intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 62(3), 439–451.

25.

Nagda

B. A.

Zúñiga

(2003). Fostering meaningful racial engagement through intergroup dialogues. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 6(1), 111–128.

26.

Orren

P. M.

Werner

P. D.

(2007). Effects of brief wilderness programs in relation to adolescents' race. Journal of Experiential Education, 30(2), 117–133.

27.

Paluck

E. L.

(2006). Diversity training and intergroup contact: A call for action research. Journal of Social Issues, 62(3), 577–595.

28.

Pettigrew

T. F.

(1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 65–85.

29.

Pettigrew

T. F.

Tropp

L. R.

(2000). Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Recent meta-analytic findings. In Oskamp

(Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 93–114). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

30.

Pettigrew

T. F.

Tropp

L. R.

(2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5), 751–783.

31.

Robinson

J. W.

Preston

J. D.

(1976). Equal status contact and modification of racial prejudice: A reexamination of the contact hypothesis. Social Forces, 54(4), 911–924.

32.

Rodriguez

D. A.

Roberts

N. S.

(2005). Understanding the influence of gender and ethnicity on evaluations of outdoor leader effectiveness. World Leisure, 47(1), 32–44.

33.

Stanchfield

(2008). Tips and tools: The art of experiential group facilitation. Oklahoma City, OK: Wood ‘n’ Barnes Publishers.

34.

Strauss

J. P.

Connerly

M. L.

(2003). Demographics, personality, contact, and Universal-Diverse Orientation: An exploratory examination. Human Resource Management, 42(2), 159–174.

35.

Warner

(2008). Applied statistics: From bivariate through multivariate techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

36.

Washington

S. J.

Roberts

(1999). Adventure education for teaching cross-cultural perspectives. In Miles

J. C.

Priest

(Eds.), Adventure programming (pp. 359–364). State College, PA: Venture Publishing.

37.

Wittig

M. A.

Molina

(2000). Moderators and mediators of prejudice reduction in multicultural education. In Oskamp

(Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination (pp. 295–318). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

38.

Wright

Tolan

(2010). Prejudice reduction through shared adventure: A qualitatve outcome assessment of a multicultural education class. Journal of Experiential Education, 32(2), 137–154.