Background: Experiential learning (EL) through educational field trips positively impacts students’ creativity, motivation, and subject knowledge. However, research on this in the context of architecture education in Vietnam is limited. Purpose: This study delves into the largely unexplored realm of EL in the context of architecture education in Vietnam, focusing on the Project subject. Methodology: A carefully organized field trip aligned with Kolb's EL cycle engaged 22 participants from different stages of their undergraduate education. Semi-structured interviews were conducted, with 10 participants assigned to two focus groups. The data analysis utilized an elaborative coding approach within grounded theory methodology. Findings: The study reveals three core categories: traditional pedagogy constraints, experiential learning transformation, and educational ecosystem enhancement. Implications: The study informs curriculum designers and architecture lecturers about the benefits of organized field trips for enhancing architectural students’ learning experiences. The emergent theoretical framework also sets the stage for an innovative and student-centered approach to architectural education in Vietnam. Future research avenues may explore the long-term professional impact of EL and assess the practical implementation of suggested curricular changes.
AndersonD.KisielJ.StorksdieckM. (2006). Understanding Teachers’ perspectives on field trips: Discovering common ground in three countries. Curator: The Museum Journal, 49(3), 365–386. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2006.tb00229.x
2.
AuerbachC.SilversteinL. B. (2003). Qualitative Data: An Introduction to Coding and Analysis (Vol. 21). NYU Press.
3.
BatičJ. (2011). The field trip as part of spatial (architectural) design art classes. CEPS Journal, 1(2), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.429
4.
BehrendtM.FranklinT. (2014). A review of research on school field trips and their value in education. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 9(3), 235–245. Retrieved from http://www.ijese.net/makale/1331.html.
5.
BellM. (1993). What constitutes experience? Rethinking theoretical assumptions. Journal of Experiential Education, 16(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/105382599301600103
6.
BergsteinerH.AveryG. C. (2014). The twin-cycle experiential learning model: Reconceptualising kolb's theory. Studies in Continuing Education, 36(3), 257–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2014.904782
7.
BuiT. T. M. (2020). Vận dụng mô hình học trải nghiệm để nâng cao kỹ năng sư phạm cho sinh viên thông qua học phần thực hành dạy học toán [applying experiential learning model to improve pedagogical skills for students through the practical module of teaching mathematics]. Ho Chi Minh City University of Education Journal of Science, 17(5), 775–784. https://doi.org/10.54607/hcmue.js.17.5.2714(2020)
8.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage.
9.
ChiuS. K.LeeJ. (2019). Innovative experiential learning experience: Pedagogical adopting Kolb's learning cycle at higher education in Hong Kong. Cogent Education, 6(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2019.1644720
10.
GlaserB.StraussA. (1967). Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
11.
Gomez-LanierL. (2017). The experiential learning impact of international and domestic study tours: Class excursions that are more than field trips. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(1), 129–144. Retrieved from https://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE2473.pdf
12.
HeinrichW. F.GreenP. M. (2020). Remixing approaches to experiential learning, design, and assessment. Journal of Experiential Education, 43(2), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825920915608
13.
HeinzC. (2021). Emotional Intelligence Development Program for Designers [Bachelor thesis final project, California Polytechnic State University].
14.
HirschP. (2020). Teaching geography on the Mekong: Experiential learning in practice. Geography Bulletin, 37(3), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.3316/aeipt.146243
15.
HirschP.LloydK. (2005). Real and virtual experiential learning on the Mekong: Field schools, e-sims and cultural challenge. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 29(3), 321–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098260500290892
KızıltaşE.SakR. (2018). Integrating field-trip activities with other activities in the preschool curriculum: Its effects on the preschoolers’ social–emotional skills. International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, 12(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40723-018-0047-0
18.
KolbD. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development.FT Press.
19.
KuoN.-C.KawaguchiT.YangY.-F. (2020). Exploring absolute happiness through experiential education. Journal of Experiential Education, 44(4), 346–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825920975141
20.
LeT. L. A.TranQ. T. (2023). Effectiveness of experiential learning in teaching Vietnamese language in primary schools: Perspectives of teachers and administrators. International Journal of Education and Practice, 11(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v11i1.3263
21.
MatsuoM.NagataM. (2020). A revised model of experiential learning with a debriefing checklist. International Journal of Training and Development, 24(2), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12177
22.
MerriamS. B.TisdellE. J. (2015). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
23.
MiettinenR. (2000). The concept of experiential learning and john dewey's theory of reflective thought and action. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 19(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/026013700293458
24.
MorrellP. D. (2003). Cognitive impact of a grade school field trip. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 15(1), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1570279
25.
MorrisT. H. (2019). Experiential learning – a systematic review and revision of kolb's model. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.157027
26.
MusaN. N.HasmiN. A.NoorS. M.MahfodzZ.IsmailH. N.IsaOsmanN. M. (2018). The effectiveness of field trips in enhancing students’ learning outcomes in biodiversity subjects. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(1), 920–931. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v8-i1/3960
27.
NaborsM. L.EdwardsL. C.MurrayR. K. (2009). Making the case for field trips: What research tells us and what site coordinators have to say. Education,129(4), 661–667.
28.
NguyenH. T. P.TruongT. N. N. (2021). Vận dụng mô hình học tập trải nghiệm của David A. Kolb vào môn học thiết kế đồ án cho sinh viên đại học ngành kiến trúc tại Việt Nam [Applying David A. Kolb’s experiential learning model to teaching Project to university architecture students in Vietnam]. Tạp Chí Khoa Học Đại Học Mở Thành Phố Hồ Chí Minh-Kỹ thuật và Công nghệ [Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science-Engineering and Technology], 16(1), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.tech.vi.16.1.1358.2021
29.
NguyenN. N. (2022). Research on the effect and effectiveness of experiential learning for university students. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(8), 4183–4192.
30.
NguyenT. D.NguyenV. H. (2016). The use of experiential learning in teaching physics. UTEHY Journal of Science and Technology, 12, 143–149.
31.
NguyenT. H.NguyenH. Q.ChuH. M. (2020). Guide Pedagogical Students to Design and Organize Experience-based Learning Activities in Schools. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(9), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.9.6
32.
NguyenT. N. P. (2018). Thực trạng tổ chức dạy học trải nghiệm của giảng viên Khoa Sư phạm, Trường Đại học Cần Thơ [Actual situation of organization of experiential teaching of lecturers of Faculty of Pedagogy, Can Tho University]. Can Tho University Journal of Science, 54(9)104–112. https://doi.org/10.22144/ctu.jvn.2018.166
33.
NguyenT. T. T. (2019). Quy trình thiết kế và tổ chức dạy học các chủ đề trải nghiệm trong môn hóa học [The process of designing and organizing teaching of experiential topics in chemistry]. Hue University Journal of Science: Social Sciences and Humanities, 128(6A), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.26459/hueuni-jssh.v128i6a.4869
34.
ParkerE. C. (2018). A Grounded Theory of Adolescent High School Women's Choir Singers’ Process of Social Identity Development. Journal of Research in Music Education, 65(4), 439–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429417743478
35.
PhuongT. T.McLeanG. N. (2016). The experiences of Vietnamese university faculty in relation to their faculty development. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(4), 599–608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9454-5
36.
Salazar FerroC.Artega ArredondoI.RodriguezC. M.NadalD. H. (2020). Active learning in architectural education: A Participatory Design Experience (PDE) in Colombia. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 39(2), 346–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12280
37.
SchenckJ.CruickshankJ. (2015). Evolving Kolb: Experiential education in the age of neuroscience. Journal of Experiential Education, 38(1), 73–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825914547153
38.
SeamanJ. (2008). Experience, reflect, critique: The end of the “learning cycles” era. Journal of Experiential Education, 31(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.5193/jee.31.1.3
39.
SeamanJ.BrownM.QuayJ. (2017). The evolution of experiential learning theory: Tracing lines of research in the JEE. Journal of Experiential Education, 40(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053825916689268
40.
SpenceC. (2020). Senses of place: Architectural design for the multisensory mind. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00243-4
41.
TangM. D.PhamK. M. (2020). Mô hình học tập trải nghiệm Kolb: Dạy học trường hợp đồng dạng cạnh-cạnh-cạnh của hai tam giác [Kolb experiential learning model: Teaching the case of side-by-side congruence of two triangles]. Ho Chi Minh City University of Education Journal of Science, 17(5), 766–774. https://doi.org/10.54607/hcmue.js.17.5.2713(2020)
42.
TannebaumR. P.TannebaumA. E. (2019). Architecture + design as a means for constructing an experiential and democratic learning environment in the social studies classroom. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(4), 58–74.
43.
TranT. G. (2017). Applying experiential learning Kolb's model into designing “experiential learning cycle” in teaching biology in general school. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, 33(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1159/vnuer.4105
44.
Van DoorenE.Van DorstM.AsselbergsT.Van MerrienboerJ.BoshuizenE. (2019). The tacit design process in architectural design education. Design and Technology Education, 24(1), 79–100.
45.
VuP. L.NguyenT. P. V.PhanT. Q. L. (2019). Building assessment toolkit to assess collaborative problem-solving competence through teaching chemistry of the non-metals. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, 35(4), 112–126. https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1159/vnuer.4296
