The objective of this article is to illustrate the importance of the role philosophy and its tools play in the designing and undertaking of nursing research and its importance to be understood by the practicing researcher to ensure the selected methodology and the tools used provide the framework for obtaining reliable and valid answers to their research questions. The article discusses the three major paradigms (Positivism, Interpretivism, and Pragmatism) which have characterized much of health-related research together with a set of essential and practical tools with no metaphysical assumptions that will hopefully provide an explicit framework and a nomenclature which can be applied as we proceed through the research process.
Al KalaldehM.ShoshaG. A.SaiahN.SalamehO. (2017). Dimensions of phenomenology in exploring patient’s suffering in long-life illnesses. Journal of Patient Experience, 5(1), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/2374373517723314
2.
AllemangB.SitterK.DimitropoulosG. (2022). Pragmatism as a paradigm for patient-oriented research. Health expectations: an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 25(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13384
3.
AllportG. W. (1962). Personality: a psychological interpretation. London.
AndersenF.AnjumR. L.RoccaE. (2019). Philosophical bias is the one bias that science cannot avoid. Elife, 8(8), e44929. https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.44929
6.
AndreasHolger (2011). Wissenschaftslogik von Gedankenexperi-menten. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie59(1):75–91.
7.
AnjumR. L.CopelandS.RoccaE. (2020). Introduction: Why is philosophy relevant for clinical practice? In AnjumR. L.CopelandS.RoccaE. (Eds.), Rethinking causality, complexity and evidence for the unique patient (pp. 3–11). Springer.
8.
ArmstrongP. B. (2005). Phenomenology Johns Hopkins guide for literary theory and criticism entry (2nd ed.). Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
BergdahlE.BerteröC. M. (2014). The myth of induction in qualitative nursing research. Nursing Philosophy, 16(2), 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12073
11.
BergmanM. M. (Ed.). (2008). Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications. SAGE.
12.
BishopM. (1998). An epistemological role for thought experiments. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, 63, 19–34.
13.
CheraghiF.YousefzadehM. R.GoodarziA. (2019). The role and status of philosophy in nursing knowledge, insight and competence. Journal of Clinical Research in Paramedical Sciences, 8(2), 90762. https://doi.org/10.5812/jcrps.90762
14.
CiukD.TroyA. K.JonesM. C. (2015). Measuring emotion: Self-reports vs. physiological indicators. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2595359
15.
CooperR. (2005). Thought experiments. Metaphilosophy, 36, 328–347.
16.
CorryM.PorterS.McKennaH. (2018). The redundancy of positivism as a paradigm for nursing research. Nursing Philosophy, 20(1), e12230. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12230
17.
CrottyMichael (1996). Phenomenology and Nursing Research. W.B. Saunders Company.
18.
DolanS.NowellL.McCaffreyG. (2022). Pragmatism as a philosophical foundation to integrate education, practice, research and policy across the nursing profession. Journal of advanced nursing, 78(10), e118–e129. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15373
19.
EdsallJ. T.American Association for the Advancement of Science Committee on Scientific Freedom and Responsibility. (1975). Scientific freedom and responsibility: A report of the AAAS Committee on Scientific Freedom and Responsidility. AAAS.
20.
EngberinkA. O.MaillyM.MarcoV.BourrieD.BenezechJ.-P.ChevallierJ.VanderhoevenS.CrosnierR.BourrelG.LognosB. (2020). A phenomenological study of nurses experience about their palliative approach and their use of mobile palliative care teams in medical and surgical care units in France. BMC Palliative Care, 19(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-020-0536-0.
21.
FarrugiaP.PetrisorB. A.FarrokhyarF.BhandariM. (2010). Practical tips for surgical research: Research questions, hypotheses and objectives. Canadian journal of surgery. Journal Canadian de chirurgie, 53(4), 278–281.
22.
GimmlerAntjePhilipHøjmeLautrup KristensenJakob Bo (2023). The Varieties of Applied Philosophy: Introduction. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy56(2), 105–111.
23.
GreeneJ. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. Jossey-Bass.
24.
JangH.-Y.YangJ.-E.ShinY.-S. (2022). A phenomenological study of nurses’ experience in caring for COVID-19 patients. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(5), 2924. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052924
25.
KalraS.JenaB. N.YeravdekarR. (2018). Emotional and Psychological Needs of People with Diabetes. Indian journal of endocrinology and metabolism, 22(5), 696–704. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijem.IJEM_579_17
26.
KasperL.-R.BrownleeK.CoadyD. (2017). A companion to applied philosophy. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
27.
LipscombM. (2024). Can philosophy benefit nurses and/or nursing? Heidegger and Strauss, problems of knowledge and context. Nursing philosophy: an international journal for healthcare professionals, 25(1), e12468. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12468
28.
MatuaG. A.Van Der WalD. M. (2015). Differentiating between descriptive and interpretive phenomenological research approaches. Nurse Researcher, 22(6), 22–27.
29.
MayumiN.OtaK. (2022). Implications of philosophical pragmatism for nursing: Comparison of different pragmatists. Nursing Philosophy, 24(1), e12414. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12414
30.
MeadowsK. (2024). Phenomenology: A method for the interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. Clinical Nursing Research, 33(4), 262–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738241240032
31.
MertonR. K. (1973). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press.
32.
MoustakasC. (1995). Phenomenological research methods. SAGE.
33.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine; Policy and Global Affairs; Committee on Science, Engineering, Medicine, and Public Policy; Committee on Responsible Science. (2017, April11). Fostering integrity in research. National Academies Press (US). 2, Foundations of Integrity in Research: Core Values and Guiding Norms. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK475948/
34.
PopperK. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.
RodriguezASmithJ (2018) Phenomenology as a healthcare research method. Evidence-Based Nursing, 21(4). pp. 96–98. ISSN 1367-6539
37.
Sinead RyanG. (2019). Postpositivist critical realism: philosophy, methodology and method for nursing research. Nurse researcher, 27(3), 20–26. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2019.e1598
38.
TemboA. C. (2023). The place of philosophy in nursing. Nursing Philosophy: An International Journal for Healthcare Professionals, 25(1), e12473. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12473
