Coordination of the various soft palate and pharyngeal muscles should be considered while evaluating velopharyngeal closure. However, it remains unclear whether different muscle bundles have specific functions during velopharyngeal closure. We macroscopically and microscopically examined these muscles in detail and particularly clarified the morphology of the palatopharyngeus (PP) in velopharyngeal closure.
Design:
Forty halves of 21 heads from Japanese cadavers (average: 83.9 years) were used for analysis; 37 halves of 19 heads were macroscopically examined and 3 halves of 2 heads were histologically examined.
Results:
The PP consisted of muscle bundles originating from the superior and inferior surfaces of the palatine aponeurosis. The most superior part of the superior constrictor (SC) and most lateral part of PP on the palatine aponeurosis initially ran in parallel and subsequently, in superoposterior and inferoposterior directions, respectively. The PP appeared as a single continuous sheet that was radially spread as a whole. Its medial margins, located superior and inferior to the aponeurosis, formed a fold that established the palatopharyngeal arch. The stylopharyngeus (StP) adjoined the base of this arch.
Conclusions:
Since PP consisted of muscle bundles running in various directions, various functions of these bundles should be considered during velopharyngeal closure. The PP can function as a sphincter with SC and as an elevator with StP. In addition, PP forms the medial protrusion in collaboration with StP and SC. Thus, PP plays an important role in velopharyngeal closure with the coordination of various muscles.
BlountRFLachmanE. The digestive system. In: ShaefferJP, ed. Morris’s Human Anatomy. 11th ed. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: The Blakiston; 1953:1292–1424.
2.
CalnanJS. Movements of the soft palate. Br J Plast Surg. 1953;5(4):286–296.
3.
ChoJHKimJKLeeHYYoonJH. Surgical anatomy of human soft palate. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(11):2900–2904.
4.
ChoiDYBaeJHYounKHKimHJHuKS. Anatomical considerations of the longitudinal pharyngeal muscles in relation to their function on the internal surface of pharynx. Dysphagia. 2014;29(6):722–730.
5.
CroftCBShprintzenRJRakoffSJ. Patterns of velopharyngeal valving in normal and cleft palate subjects: a multi-view videofluoroscopic and nasendoscopic study. Laryngoscope. 1981;91(2):265–271.
6.
DicksonDR. Normal and cleft palate anatomy. Cleft Palate J. 1972;9:280–293.
7.
DuaKShakerRRenJArndorferRHofmannC. Mechanism and timing of nasopharyngeal closure during swallowing and belching. Am J Physiol. 1995;268(6 pt 1):1037–1042.
8.
FleischhauerK. Kreislauf und Eingeweide. In: FleischhauerKStaubesandJZenkerW, eds. Bennunghoff Makroskopische und Mikroskopische Anatomie des Menschen. Munchen, German; Wien, Austria; Baltimore, MD: Urban and Schwarzenberg; 1985:133–306.
9.
FritzellB. The velopharyngeal muscles in speech. An electromyographic and cineradiographic study. Acta Otolaryngol. 1969;Suppl 250:1+.
10.
GlaserERSkolnickMLMcWilliamsBJShprintzenRJ. The dynamics of Passavant’s ridge in subjects with and without velopharyngeal insufficiency—a multi-view videofluoroscopic study. Cleft Palate J. 1979;16(1):24–33.
11.
HuangMHLeeSTRajendranK. Anatomic basis of cleft palate and velopharyngeal surgery: implications from a fresh cadaveric study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101(3):613–627.
12.
InouyaJPellandCLinKBorowitzKBlemkerS. A computational model of velopharyngeal closure for simulating cleft palate repair. J Craniofac Surg. 2015a;26(3):658–662.
13.
InouyaJPerryJLinKBlemkerS. A computational model quantifies the effect of anatomical variability on velopharyngeal function. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015b;58(4):1119–1133.
14.
IsbergAMHenningssonGE. Intraindividual change in the occurrence of Passavant’s ridge due to change in velopharyngeal sphincter function: a videofluoroscopic study. Cleft Palate J. 1990;27(3):253–257.
15.
KahrilasPJ. Pharyngeal structure and function. Dysphagia. 1993;8(4):303–307.
16.
KotlarekKJPerryJLFangX. Morphology of the levator veli palatini muscle in adults with repaired cleft palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28(3):833–837.
17.
KriensOB. An anatomical approach to veloplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;43(1):29–41.
18.
LeonhardtH. Innere organe. In: LeonhardtHTillmannBTonduryGZillesK, eds. Rauber/Kopsch Anatomie des Menschen. Stuttgart, Germany: George Thieme; 1987:239–388.
19.
McMynJK. The anatomy of the salpingo-pharyngeus muscle. J Laryngol Otol. 1940;55(1):1–22.
20.
NakayamaEToharaHHirabaHSanpeiRWakasaHOhnoSKumakuraAGoraKAbeKUedaK. Effects of reclining posture on velopharyngeal closing pressure during swallowing and phonation. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40(6):450–456.
21.
OkadaRMuroSEguchiKYagiKNasuHYamaguchiKMiwaKAkitaK. The extended bundle of the tensor veli palatini: anatomic consideration of the dilating mechanism of the Eustachian tube. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2018;45(2):265–272.
22.
OkudaSAbeSKimHJAgematsuHMitarashiSTamatsuYIdeY. Morphologic characteristics of palatopharyngeal muscle. Dysphagia. 2008;23(3):258–266.
23.
PerryJL. Anatomy and physiology of the velopharyngeal mechanism. Semin Speech Lang. 2011a;32(2):83–92.
24.
PerryJL. Variations in velopharyngeal structures between upright and supine positions using upright magnetic resonance imaging. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011b;48(2):123–133.
25.
PerryJLKotlarekKJSuttonBPKuehnDPJaskolkaMSFangXPointSWRauccioF. Variations in velopharyngeal structure in adults with repaired cleft palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018a;55(10):1409–1418. doi:1055665617752803.
26.
PerryJLKuehnDPSuttonBP. Morphology of the levator veli palatini muscle using magnetic resonance imaging. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2013;50(1):64–75.
27.
PerryJLKuehnDPSuttonBPFangX. Velopharyngeal structural and functional assessment of speech in young children using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017;54(4):408–422.
28.
PerryJLMasonKSuttonBPKuehnDP. Can dynamic MRI be used to accurately identify velopharyngeal closure patterns?Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018b;55(4):499–507.
29.
PerryJLSuttonBPKuehnDPGamageJK. Using MRI for assessing velopharyngeal structures and function. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2014;51(4):476–485.
30.
ProcterB. Anatomy of the eustachian tube. Arch Otolaryngol. 1973;97(1):2–8.
31.
SakamotoY. Spatial relationship between the palatopharyngeus and the superior constrictor of the pharynx. Surg Radiol Anat. 2015;37(6):649–655.
32.
SakamotoYSogaSJinzakiMYamadaYOgataHKishiK. Evaluation of velopharyngeal closure by 4D imaging using 320-detector-row computed tomography. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015;68(4):479–484.
33.
ShprintzenRJRakofSJSkolnickMLLavoratoAS. Incongruous movements of the velum and lateral pharyngeal walls. Cleft Palate J. 1977;14(2):148–157.
34.
SinclairDC. Muscles and fascicles. In: RomanesGJ, ed. Cunningham’s Textbook of Anatomy. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 1981:300–301.
35.
SkolnickML. Velopharyngeal function in cleft palate. Clin Plast Surg. 1975;2(2):285–297.
36.
SkolnickMLMcCallGN. Velopharyngeal competence and incompetence following pharyngeal flap surgery: video-fluoroscopic study in multiple projections. Cleft Palate J. 1972;9(1):1–12.
37.
SkolnickMLMcCallGNBarnesM. The sphincteric mechanism of velopharyngeal closure. Cleft Palate J. 1973;10(3):286–305.
38.
SkolnickMLShprintzenRJMcCallGNRakoffS. Patterns of velopharyngeal closure in subjects with repaired cleft palate and normal speech: a multi-view videofluoroscopic analysis. Cleft Palate J. 1975;12(4):369–376.
39.
StephanM. Pharynx. In: StandringS, ed. Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice. 41th ed. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier; 2015:571–585.
40.
SumidaKAndoYSekiSYamashitaKFujimuraABabaOKitamuraS. Anatomical status of the human palatopharyngeal sphincter and its functional implications. Surg Radiol Anat. 2017;39(11):1191–1201.
41.
SumidaKYamashitaKKitamuraS. Gross anatomical study of the human palatopharyngeus muscle throughout its entire course from origin to insertion. Clin Anat. 2012;25(3):314–323.
42.
ThaneGD. Quain’s Elements of Anatomy. London, England: Longmans Green; 1894:308–309.
43.
WhillisJ. A note on the muscles of the palate and the superior constrictor. J Anat. 1930;65(pt 1):92–95.
44.
WitzelMAPosnickJC. Patterns and location of velopharyngeal valving problems: atypical findings on video nasopharyngoscopy. Cleft Palate J. 1989;26(1):63–67.
45.
YanagisawaEWeaverEM. Passavant’s ridge: is it a functional structure?Ear Nose Throat J. 1996;75(12):766–767.
