Open Versus Minimally Invasive Approach for Craniosynostosis: Analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric

Abstract

Objective

This multicenter study aimed to compare demographic, operative, and short-term outcomes data between open and minimally invasive surgical approaches for craniosynostosis repair utilizing the American College of Surgeon’s National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric (NSQIP-P) database and highlight surgical disparities among races and ethnicities.

Design

Retrospective review of large multicenter database.

Setting

Freestanding general acute care children's hospitals, children's hospitals within a larger hospital, specialty children's hospitals, or general acute care hospitals with a pediatric wing.

Patients and Participants

A total of 4931 pediatric patients underwent craniosynostosis correction within the NSQIP-P database from 2013 to 2019.

Interventions

None.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Demographic information included age at surgery, sex, race, and ethnicity. Operative and outcomes measures included operative time, anesthesia time, days until discharge, postoperative complications, blood transfusions, 30-day readmission, and 30-day unplanned return to operating room.

Results

Patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery had significantly shorter operative and anesthesia times (p < .001; p < .001), fewer days until discharge (p < .001), fewer postoperative complications (p < .05), and less blood transfusions (p < .001). The proportion of White patients was significantly higher in the minimally invasive surgery group (p < .01), whereas Black and Hispanic patients had a significantly higher proportion in the open surgery group (p < .001; p < .001). Additionally, the percentage of patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery increased from 3.8% in 2014 to over 13% in 2019.

Conclusions

This study adds to a growing consensus that minimally invasive surgery has significantly decreased operative time, anesthesia time, transfusion rates, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications compared to open surgery. Racial and ethnic surgical disparities showed larger proportions of Black and Hispanic populations undergoing open procedures.

Keywords

craniofacial morphology craniosynostosis surgical technique

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Campbell

Derderian

. Craniosynostosis. In: Janis

, ed. Essentials of plastic surgery, 2nd ed. CRC Press; 2014: 264–277.

Governale

. Craniosynostosis. Pediatr Neurol. 2015;53(5):394‐401.

Johnson

Wilkie

. Craniosynostosis. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011;19(4):369‐376.

Cloonan

Collett

Speltz

Anderka

Werler

. Psychosocial outcomes in children with and without non-syndromic craniosynostosis: findings from two studies. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2013;50(4):406‐413.

Garza

Khosla

. Nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Semin Plast Surg. 2012;26(2):53‐63.

Panchal

Uttchin

. Management of craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;111(6):2032‐2048.

Erb

Meier

. Surgical treatment of craniosynostosis in infants: open vs closed repair. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2016;29(3):345‐351.

American College of Surgeons. About ACS NSQIP Pediatric. Accessed January 12, 2022. https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/childrens-surgery/pediatric/overview; n.d.

Jubbal

Agrawal

Hollier

Jr. . Analysis of morbidity, readmission, and reoperation after craniosynostosis repair in children. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28(2):401‐405.

10.

Massenburg

Nassar

Hopper

. National database reported outcomes following craniosynostosis reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg. 2020;31(1):154‐157.

11.

Sherrod

Johnston

Rocque

. Risk factors for unplanned readmission within 30 days after pediatric neurosurgery: a nationwide analysis of 9799 procedures from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016;18(3):350‐362.

12.

Markiewicz

Alden

Momin

Olsson

Jurado

Abdullah

Miloro

. Does receiving a blood transfusion predict for length of stay in children undergoing cranial vault remodeling for craniosynostosis? Outcomes using the pediatric national surgical quality improvement program dataset. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75(8):1732‐1741.

13.

Hall

Barrientos

Flores

Cemaj

Kugler

Miller

. Perioperative management and factors associated with transfusion in cranial vault reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(7):2014‐2017.

14.

Rochlin

Sheckter

Lorenz

Khosla

. Nationwide perioperative analysis of endoscopic versus open surgery for craniosynostosis: equal access, unequal outcomes. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(1):149‐153.

15.

Thompson

Zurakowski

Haberkern

Stricker

Meier

Bannister

Henzon

Binstock

Bosenberg

Brzenski . Endoscopic versus open repair for craniosynostosis in infants using propensity score matching to compare outcomes: a multicenter study from the pediatric craniofacial collaborative group. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(3):968‐975.

16.

Chan

Stewart

Stalder

St Hilaire

McBride

Moses

. Endoscope-assisted versus open repair of craniosynostosis: a comparison of perioperative cost and risk. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24(1):170‐174.

17.

Vogel

Woo

Kane

Patel

Naidoo

Smyth

. A comparison of costs associated with endoscope-assisted craniectomy versus open cranial vault repair for infants with sagittal synostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014;13(3):324‐331.

18.

Liles

Dallas

Hale

Gannon

Vance

Bonfield

Shannon

. The economic impact of open versus endoscope-assisted craniosynostosis surgery. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2019;24(2):145‐152.

19.

Garber

Karsy

Kestle

JRW

Siddiqi

Spanos

Riva-Cambrin

. Comparing outcomes and cost of 3 surgical treatments for sagittal synostosis: a retrospective study including procedure-related cost analysis. Neurosurgery. 2017;81(4):680‐687.

20.

Jivraj

Ahmed

Karia

Menon

Robertson

Sodha

Wormald

JCR

O'hara

Jeelani

Dunaway

. A 24-month cost and outcome analysis comparing traditional fronto-orbital advancment and remodeling with endoscopic strip craniectomy and molding helmet in the management of unicoronal craniosynostosis: a retrospective bi-institutional review. JPRAS Open. 2019;20:35‐42.

21.

Zubovic

Lapidus

Skolnick

Naidoo

Smyth

Patel

. Cost comparison of surgical management of nonsagittal synostosis: traditional open versus endoscope-assisted techniques. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2020;25(4):351‐360.

22.

Yan

Abel

Alotaibi

Anderson

Niazi

Weil

Fallah

Phillips

Forrest

Kulkarni

. A systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic versus open treatment of craniosynostosis. Part 1: the sagittal suture. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018a;22(4):352‐360.

23.

Yan

Abel

Alotaibi

Anderson

Niazi

Weil

Fallah

Phillips

Forrest

Kulkarni

. A systematic review of endoscopic versus open treatment of craniosynostosis. Part 2: the nonsagittal single sutures. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018b;22(4):361‐368.

24.

Goyal

Yolcu

Elminawy

Daniels

. Endoscopic versus open approach in craniosynostosis repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes. Childs Nerv Syst. 2018;34(9):1627‐1637.

25.

Seruya

Boyajian

Posnick

Myseros

Yaun

Keating

. Long-term outcomes of primary craniofacial reconstruction for craniosynostosis: a 12-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127(6):2397‐2406.

26.

Han

Nguyen

Bruck

Skolnick

Yarbrough

Naidoo

Patel

Kane

Woo

Smyth

. Characterization of complications associated with open and endoscopic craniosynostosis surgery at a single institution. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016;17(3):361‐370.

27.

Abraham

Brandel

Dalle Ore

Reid

Kpaduwa

Lance

Meltzer

Gosman

. Predictors of postoperative complications of craniosynostosis repair in the national inpatient sample. Ann Plast Surg. 2018;80(5S):S261‐S266.

28.

Arts

Delye

van Lindert

. Intraoperative and postoperative complications in the surgical treatment of craniosynostosis: minimally invasive versus open surgical procedures. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018;21(2):112‐118.

29.

Hoffman

Valenti

Odigie

Warren

Premaratne

Imahiyerobo

. Impact of health disparities on treatment for single-suture craniosynostosis in an era of multimodal care. Neurosurg Focus. 2021;50(4):E13.

30.

Lin

Pan

Harris

Luerssen

Lam

. The impact of insurance, race, and ethnicity on age at surgical intervention among children with nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. J Pediatr. 2015;166(5):1289‐1296.

31.

Brown

Bey

Bonfield

Westrick

Kelly

Wellons

. Racial disparities in health care access among pediatric patients with craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016;18(3):269‐274.

32.

Shweikeh

Foulad

Nuño

Drazin

Adamo

. Differences in surgical outcomes for patients with craniosynostosis in the US: impact of socioeconomic variables and race. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016;17(1):27‐33.

33.

Shultz

Gabrick

Abraham

Cabrejo

Persing

Alperovich

. National longitudinal comparison of patients undergoing surgical management of craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(7):1755‐1759.

34.

Wallace

Birgfeld

Speltz

Starr

Collett

. Surgical approach and periprocedural outcomes by race and ethnicity of children undergoing craniosynostosis surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(6):1384‐1391.