Characterize the interventions and assistance employed by a cleft nurse navigator (CNN) which have mediated improvement in care equity at our institution.
Design
Retrospective study.
Setting
Academic tertiary care center.
Patients, Participants
Patients presenting with cleft lip and/or cleft palate presenting between August 2020 and August 2021 with exclusions for syndromic diagnosis, Pierre-Robin sequence, late (> 6 months) presentation, and prior cleft surgery at outside institutions.
Interventions
Multidisciplinary cleft nurse navigator program
Main Outcome Measure(s)
Family interactions with the CNN by phone, text, and email across the first year of life including feeding support, nasoalveolar molding (NAM) assistance, appointment scheduling, financial assistance, addressing perioperative concerns, and facilitating physician consults. Patient weight and surgical timing were also recorded.
Results
Sixty-nine patients were included with a total of 639 interactions between the CNN and families. Scheduling support (30%), addressing perioperative concerns (22%), and feeding support (20%) were the most common interactions. Feeding support and NAM assistance were heavily distributed in the first 3 months of life compared to after 3 months (P < .001). Median age at first contact was 1 week (range: 22 weeks gestation-14 weeks). There was no difference in the proportion of families receiving feeding support, NAM assistance, or scheduling assistance based on insurance status or race (P > .05 for all).
Conclusions
Scheduling assistance, addressing perioperative concerns, and feeding support are the predominant methods by which the CNN interacts with and assists families of patients with cleft conditions. CNN service distribution is largely equitable between demographic groups.
MosseyPALittleJMungerRGDixonMJShawWC. Cleft lip and palate. The Lancet. 2009;374(9703):1773-1785.
2.
PanamontaVPradubwongSPanamontaMChowchuenB. Global birth prevalence of orofacial clefts: A systematic review. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015;98(Suppl 7):S11-S21.
3.
BatraPDuggalRParkashH. Genetics of cleft lip and palate revisited. Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2003;27(4):311-320.
4.
WolfLS, MOT O. Feeding management of infants with cleft lip and palate and micrognathia. Infants Young Child. 1999;12(1):70-81.
5.
SharmaRKNandaV. Problems of middle ear and hearing in cleft children. Indian J Plast Surg. 2009;42(S 01):S144-S148.
6.
GraysonBHAhmedMMKassamSN. The role of pediatric dentists and orthodontists in the presurgical treatment of infants born with cleft lip and palate. In: Video atlas of cleft lip and palate surgery. Plural Publishing inc.; 2013:41-48.
7.
MenezesRVieiraAR. Dental anomalies as part of the cleft spectrum. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008;45(4):414-419.
8.
WittPDAntonioDLL. Velopharyngeal insufficiency and secondary palatal management: A new look at an old problem. Clin Plast Surg. 1993;20(4):707-721.
9.
ThanawirattananitPThanaviratananichS. Speech, language, voice, resonance and hearing disorders in patients with cleft lip and palate. J Med Assoc Thai. 2013;96(4):S71-S80.
10.
BransonEKBransonVMMcGrathRRausaVCKilpatrickNCroweLM. Psychological and peer difficulties of children with cleft lip and/or palate: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022:10556656221125377.
11.
HuntOBurdenDHepperPJohnstonC. The psychosocial effects of cleft lip and palate: A systematic review. Eur J Orthod. 2005;27(3):274-285.
12.
NichollsWSelveyLAHarperCPerssonMRobinsonS. The psychosocial impact of cleft in a western Australian cohort across 3 age groups. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019;56(2):210-221.
13.
KummerAW. Cleft palate and craniofacial conditions: A comprehensive guide to clinical management: A comprehensive guide to clinical management. Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2018.
14.
FrederickRHoganACSeaboltNStocksRMS. An ideal multidisciplinary cleft lip and cleft palate care team. Oral Dis. 2022;28(5):1412-1417.
15.
VillavisanisDFBlumJDPlanaNMTaubPJTaylorJA. Choosing a multidisciplinary cleft and craniofacial team: Medical, surgical, and social considerations. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022:10556656221129967.
16.
AbbottMMKokorowskiPJMearaJG. Timeliness of surgical care in children with special health care needs: Delayed palate repair for publicly insured and minority children with cleft palate. J Pediatr Surg. 2011;46(7):1319-1324.
KalmarCLMalphrusELKosykMSZapateroZDTaylorJA. Socioeconomic disparities in cleft lip care. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022:10556656221078488.
19.
MullenMCYanFFordMEPatelKGPechaPP. Racial and ethnic disparities in primary cleft lip and cleft palate repair. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021:10556656211069828.
20.
ParsaeiYPeckCJazayeriHLopezJSteinbacherD. Racial disparities in cleft lip repair: A national assessment. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;79(10):e63-e64.
21.
KimiaRButlerPDGuajardoI, et al.Sociodemographic factors that influence the choice to pursue nasoalveolar molding: One pediatric hospital’s experience. Article. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2020;57(9):1069-1077. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665620936056
22.
LynnJVRanganathanKBagerisMHHart-JohnsonTBuchmanSRBlackwoodRA. Sociodemographic predictors of missed appointments among patients with cleft lip and palate. Article. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2018;55(10):1440-1446. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665618764739
23.
PatmonDCarlsonAGirottoJ. Racial disparities in the timing of alveolar bone grafting. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022:10556656221097813.
24.
SilvestreJBastaMNFischerJPLoweKMMayroRJacksonO. Minority and public insurance status: Is there a delay to alveolar bone grafting surgery?Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017;54(1):1-6.
25.
PfeifaufKDCooperDCGibsonE, et al.Factors contributing to delay or absence of alveolar bone grafting. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2022;161(6):820-828. e1.
26.
PeckCJPourtaheriNParsaeiY, et al.Race-based differences in the utilization and timing of secondary cleft procedures in the United States. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022;59(11):1413-1421.
27.
CepedaAJrAustinMTNguyenPDTeichgraeberJFGreivesMR. Racial disparities affect timing of alveolar bone grafting for patients with cleft lip and palate: An analysis of the 2012 kKids’ inpatient database. FACE. 2021;2(4):357-363.
28.
PhillipsSHaucSCSassonDC, et al.Sociodemographic disparities in access to cleft rhinoplasty. Article in Press. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2022. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008908
29.
JacksonOStranskyCAJawadAF, et al.The children’s hospital of Philadelphia modification of the Furlow double-opposing Z-palatoplasty: 30-year experience and long-term speech outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(3):613-622.
30.
SullivanSRMarrinanEMLaBrieRARogersGFMullikenJB. Palatoplasty outcomes in nonsyndromic patients with cleft palate: A 29-year assessment of one surgeon's experience. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2009;20(1):612-616.
31.
ChapmanKLHardin-JonesMAGoldsteinJAHalterKAHavlikRJSchulteJ. Timing of palatal surgery and speech outcome. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2008;45(3):297-308.
32.
VuGHWardenCZimmermanCE, et al.Poverty and risk of cleft lip and palate: An analysis of United States birth data. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2021;149(1):169-182.
33.
BerkowitzSAParashuramSRowanK, et al.Association of a care coordination model with health care costs and utilization: The Johns Hopkins community health partnership (J-CHiP). JAMA network Open. 2018;1(7):e184273-e184273.
34.
ClaiborneN. Effectiveness of a care coordination model for stroke survivors: A randomized study. Health Soc Work. 2006;31(2):87-96.
35.
MassonCLDelucchiKLMcKnightC, et al.A randomized trial of a hepatitis care coordination model in methadone maintenance treatment. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(10):e81-e88.
36.
CadyRGEricksonMLunosS, et al.Meeting the needs of children with medical complexity using a telehealth advanced practice registered nurse care coordination model. Matern Child Health J. 2015;19(7):1497-1506.
37.
WagnerCZimmermanCEBarreroC, et al.Reduced socioeconomic disparities in cleft care after implementing a cleft nurse navigator program. Article. Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2022;59(3):320-329. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656211005646
38.
TaufiqueZMEscherPJGathmanTJ, et al.Demographic risk factors for malnutrition in patients with cleft lip and palate. Article. Laryngoscope. 2022;132(7):1482-1486. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.29899
39.
BaylisALPearsonGDHallC, et al.A quality improvement initiative to improve feeding and growth of infants with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;55(9):1218-1224.
40.
EscherPJZavalaHLeeDRobyBBChinnaduraiS. Malnutrition as a risk factor in cleft lip and palate surgery. Laryngoscope. 2021;131(6):E2060-E2065.
41.
PandyaANBoormanJG. Failure to thrive in babies with cleft lip and palate. Br J Plast Surg. 2001;54(6):471-475.
42.
CladisFKumarAGrunwaldtLOttesonTFordMLoseeJE. Pierre Robin sequence: A perioperative review. Anesth Analg. 2014;119(2):400-412.
43.
GroenewaldCBRabbittsJAHansenEPalermoTM. Racial differences in opioid prescribing for children in the United States. Pain. 2018;159(10):2050.
44.
HollingsheadNAMeintsSMMillerMMRobinsonMEHirshAT. A comparison of race-related pain stereotypes held by white and black individuals. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2016;46(12):718-723.
45.
LawrenceAEDeansKJChisolmDJWronaSKMinneciPCCooperJN. Racial disparities in receipt of postoperative opioids after pediatric cholecystectomy. J Surg Res. 2020;245(1):309-314.
46.
GuedjRMariniMKossowskyJBerdeCBKimiaAAFleeglerEW. Racial and ethnic disparities in pain management of children with limb fractures or suspected appendicitis: A retrospective cross-sectional study. Front Pediatr. 2021;9(1):652854.
47.
MainousAGBakerRLoveMMGrayDPGillJM. Continuity of care and trust in one’s physician: Evidence from primary care in the United States and the United Kingdom. Fam Med. 2001;33(1):22-27.
48.
FreundKMBattagliaTACalhounE, et al.Impact of patient navigation on timely cancer care: The patient navigation research program. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(6):dju115.
49.
WinklerCSHardawayJCCeyhanMEEspatNJSaied CalvinoA. Decreasing colorectal cancer screening disparities: A culturally tailored patient navigation program for Hispanic patients. Cancer. 2022;128(9):1820-1825.
WahlTSGossLEMorrisMS, et al.Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) eliminates racial disparities in postoperative length of stay after colorectal surgery. Ann Surg. 2018;268(6):1026-1035.
52.
ShinMWagnerCPrasadA, et al.Enhanced recovery after surgery for pediatric cleft repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2022;33(6):1709-1713.
