Apply thematic analysis of online discussion boards to characterize families’ experiences and concerns regarding craniosynostosis diagnoses to aid physicians in tailoring care to families.
Design
Grounded theory-based qualitative analysis.
Setting
Discussion boards related to craniosynostosis identified via Google and Yahoo.
Patients/Participants
Posts about craniosynostosis between 2017–2022.
Interventions
Thematic analysis was performed using three rounds of coding. Post features including author type and use of technical language were examined.
Main Outcome Measure
Overarching themes emerging from analysis of posts, with forums analyzed until sufficient thematic repetition was observed.
Results
366 posts from 4 websites by 290 unique users were included. Parents of patients with craniosynostosis wrote 59% of posts while patients wrote 4%. Five selective codes were identified: 1) Building Community, 2) Diagnosis/Evaluation, 3) Treatment, 4) Outcomes, and 5) Emotional Concerns. Building Community was the most assigned code (85% of posts). 71% of parents’ posts expressing emotional concerns expressed negative emotions, commonly regarding anxiety about diagnosis (71%), frustration about doctors’ responses (21%), or negative reactions to online search results (17%). 88% of patients’ posts expressed positive emotions, discussing positive long-term outcomes. Concerns that may guide physicians included anxiety about delayed diagnosis, difficulty distinguishing postpartum head shape changes from craniosynostosis, and difficulty finding a care team.
Conclusions
Online discussion boards allow families of patients with craniosynostosis to share experiences and find community. Improving communication between surgeons, pediatricians, and families about timing of evaluation and revising online information about this condition may ameliorate some anxiety associated with this diagnosis.
BuchananEPXueYXueASOlshinkaALamS. Multidisciplinary care of craniosynostosis. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2017;10(2017):263-270. doi:https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S100248
BouletSLRasmussenSAHoneinMA. A population-based study of craniosynostosis in metropolitan Atlanta, 1989-2003. Am J Med Genet A. Apr 15 2008;146A(8):984-991. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.32208
5.
CostaBEdwardsWWilkinson-BellKStockNM. Raising a child with craniosynostosis: Psychosocial adjustment in caregivers. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. :2022:10556656221102043. Ahead of Print. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656221102043
6.
CoulterMLScheuerleJLaudeMHabalMB. Psychological aspects of parents of children with craniofacial anomalies. J Craniofac Surg. Apr 1991;2(1):9-17.
7.
KutaVCurryLMcNeelyDWallingSChorneyJBezuhlyM. Understanding families’ experiences following a diagnosis of non-syndromic craniosynostosis: A qualitative study. BMJ Open. Sep 24 2020;10(9):e033403. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033403
8.
ZerpeASNowinskiDRamklintMOsterC. Parents’ experiences of their child's craniosynostosis and the initial care process. J Craniofac Surg. Jan/Feb 2020;31(1):251-256. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000006033
9.
SaydamSZCuculayefDDoganTNCrerandCEOzekM. Social experiences of Turkish parents raising a child with apert syndrome: A qualitative study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J.Mar 2021;58(3):354-361. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1055665620944761
10.
ZerpeASNowinskiDRamklintMOsterC. When the surgery was over, I felt like the worst part had passed": Experiences of parents of children with craniosynostosis. J Spec Pediatr Nurs.Apr 2022;27(2):e12370. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jspn.12370
11.
FoleyGTimonenV. Using grounded theory method to capture and analyze health care experiences. Health Serv Res. Aug 2015;50(4):1195-1210. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12275
12.
CogsilTKimDJMorrisMGoldfarbCAWallLB. Congenital upper-extremity differences: A thematic analysis of on-line discussion boards. J Hand Surg Am. Apr 2021;46(4):337 e1-337 e10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.08.006
13.
BakerLWagnerTHSingerSBundorfMK. Use of the internet and e-mail for health care information: Results from a national survey. JAMA. May 14 2003;289(18):2400-2406. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.18.2400
14.
BrownSEAlticeFL. Self-management of buprenorphine/naloxone among online discussion board users. Subst Use Misuse. Jun 2014;49(8):1017-1024. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2014.888449
15.
LawlessMTHunterSCPinero de PlazaMAArchibaldMMKitsonAL. “You Are By No Means Alone”: A netnographic study of self-care support in an online community for older adults. Qual Health Res. 2022;32(13):1935-1951. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323221124979
16.
LubertoCMHylandKAStreckJMTemelBParkER. Stigmatic and sympathetic attitudes toward cancer patients who smoke: A qualitative analysis of an online discussion board forum. Nicotine Tob Res. Dec 2016;18(12):2194-2201. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntw166
17.
SillerMSwansonMRSerlinGGeorgeA. Internal state language in the storybook narratives of children with and without autism Spectrum disorder: Investigating relations to theory of mind abilities. Res Autism Spectr Disord. May 1 2014;8(5):589-596. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.02.002
18.
RumpfALKamp-BeckerIBeckerKKauschkeC. Narrative competence and internal state language of children with Asperger Syndrome and ADHD. Res Dev Disabil. Sep-Oct 2012;33(5):1395-1407. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2012.03.007
19.
TehEJYapMJRickard LiowSJ. Emotional processing in autism spectrum disorders: Effects of age, emotional valence, and social engagement on emotional language use. J Autism Dev Disord. Dec 2018;48(12):4138-4154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-3659-x
20.
SinclairSRockwellG. Voyant-tools. Информационные системы. 2020.
21.
MarambaIDDaveyAElliottMN, et al.Web-based textual analysis of free-text patient experience comments from a survey in primary care. JMIR Med Inform. May 6 2015;3(2):e20. doi:https://doi.org/10.2196/medinform.3783
22.
CorbinJMStraussA. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol.1990/03/011990;13(1):3-21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00988593
23.
KimHMahmoodAGoldsmithJVChangHKediaSChangCF. Access to broadband internet and its utilization for health information seeking and health communication among informal caregivers in the United States. J Med Syst. Jan 15 2021;45(2):24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-021-01708-9
24.
HarveySMemonAKhanRYasinF. Parent's use of the internet in the search for healthcare information and subsequent impact on the doctor-patient relationship. Ir J Med Sci. Nov 2017;186(4):821-826. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-017-1555-6
25.
RyuJYChungHYChoiKY. Potential role of artificial intelligence in craniofacial surgery. Arch Craniofac Surg. Oct 2021;22(5):223-231. doi:https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2021.00507
26.
BooklandMJAhnESStoltzPMartinJE. Image processing and machine learning for telehealth craniosynostosis screening in newborns. J Neurosurg Pediatr. Mar 19 2021;27(5):581-588. doi:https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.9.PEDS20605
27.
KilipirisEGHornFKolnikovaM, et al.Parental satisfaction from telemedicine in the follow-up of children operated for craniosynostosis during COVID-19 pandemic. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022;60(5):10556656221074214. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656221074214
28.
RizviIFallahKNCepedaA,et al.Where are we headed? Diagnosing abnormal head shapes through virtual care visits. J Craniofac Surg. Jan-Feb 01 2022;33(1):139-141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008118
29.
WagnerAMillesiWWatzingerF, et al.Clinical experience with interactive teleconsultation and teleassistance in craniomaxillofacial surgical procedures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Dec 1999;57(12):1413-1418. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-2391(99)90722-x
30.
PatelKBPfeifaufKDSnyder-WarwickA. Family-Centered pediatric plastic surgery care. Mo Med. Mar-Apr 2021;118(2):124-129.
31.
YanHAbelTJAlotaibiNM, et al.A systematic review of endoscopic versus open treatment of craniosynostosis. Part 2: The nonsagittal single sutures. J Neurosurg Pediatr. Oct 2018;22(4):361-368. doi:https://doi.org/10.3171/2018.4.PEDS17730
32.
VaragurKSkolnickGBNaidooSDSmythMDPatelKB. School-age outcomes in patients with unilateral coronal synostosis: Comparison of fronto-orbital advancement and endoscopic strip craniectomy. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2022;29(5):1-8. doi:https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.1.PEDS21401
33.
HaAYSkolnickGBChiD, et al.School-Aged anthropometric outcomes after endoscopic or open repair of metopic synostosis. Pediatrics. Sep 2020;146(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-0238
34.
LeMBPatelKSkolnickG, et al.Assessing long-term outcomes of open and endoscopic sagittal synostosis reconstruction using three-dimensional photography. J Craniofac Surg. Mar 2014;25(2):573-576. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000000613
35.
BevilacquaRTarnowPKolbyLMalteseG. Spring-Assisted surgery in the treatment of Complex craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. Jun 2018;29(4):920-924. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000004377
36.
AbdelhamidKKonciRElHawaryHGorgyASmithL. Advanced parental age: Is it contributing to an increased incidence of non-syndromic craniosynostosis? A review of case-control studies. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. Jan-Mar 2021;11(1):78-83. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.11.016
37.
VydiswaranVGVReddyM. Identifying peer experts in online health forums. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. Apr 4 2019;19(Suppl 3):68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-019-0782-3
38.
Finney RuttenLJBlakeKDGreenberg-WorisekAJAllenSVMoserRPHesseBW. Online health information seeking among US adults: Measuring progress toward a healthy people 2020 objective. Public Health Rep. Nov/Dec 2019;134(6):617-625. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354919874074
39.
LorenceDParkH. Group disparities and health information: A study of online access for the underserved. Health Informatics J. Mar 2008;14(1):29-38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458207086332
40.
SuhJHorvitzEWhiteRWAlthoffT. Disparate impacts on online information access during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nat Commun. Nov 19 2022;13(1):7094. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34592-z
41.
LeeHYJinSWHenning-SmithCLeeJLeeJ. Role of health literacy in health-related information-seeking behavior online: Cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res. Jan 27 2021;23(1):e14088. doi:https://doi.org/10.2196/14088
42.
VaragurKMurphyJOchoaE, et al.Impact of neighborhood deprivation and social vulnerability on long-term outcomes and desire for revision in patients with craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2023:1-10. doi:https://doi.org/10.3171/2023.4.PEDS2343
43.
LavinCVFahyEJAbbasDB, et al.Readability of online patient information relating to cleft palate surgery. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. Mar 2022;59(3):330-335. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656211013177
