Perioperative Outcomes of Spring-Assisted Cranioplasty,Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Conventional Expansion in Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2026
Perioperative Outcomes of Spring-Assisted Cranioplasty,Distraction Osteogenesis Versus Conventional Expansion in Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
This study compares perioperative outcomes between spring-assisted cranioplasty (SAC), distraction osteogenesis (DO) and conventional expansion in craniosynostosis surgery.
Design
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Setting
Retrospective and prospective cohort.
Patients and Participants
A comprehensive electronic search was conducted using PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Science Direct, EBSCO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library, alongside Gray literature sources (SSRN, Scopus preprint, and MedRxiv). Publication bias was assessed and study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle Ottawa Scales (NOS).
Interventions
SAC or DO.
Main Outcome Measures
Blood loss and blood transfusion.
Results
Thirteen studies were included, with 7 studies comparing DO versus conventional and 6 comparing SAC vs conventional. All studies met eligibility criteria for meta-analysis, with study quality ranged from good to very good. Compared to conventional, the SAC or DO significantly reduced blood loss (MD = −190.42 mL), and blood transfusion (MD = −227.22). Additionally, SAC and DO shorten operative time (MD = −94.38 min), anesthesia duration (MD = −114.81 min), hospital stay (MD = −0.68 days), and ICU stay (MD = −1.00 days). Long-term follow-up showed a lower reoperation rate (OR = 0.20), but no significant change in cranial index at 10 years (MD = 0.06, P = .74).
Conclusions
SAC or DO result in lower perioperative complications, overall shorter durations, and reduced reoperation rates compared to conventional expansion. Standardized postoperative outcome reports are useful to classify the severity of complications and guide the future long-term treatment strategies for craniosynostosis surgery.
NakajimaHSakamotoYTamadaIOharaHKishiK. Dynamic total skull remodeling by a combination of morcellation craniotomy with distraction osteogenesis: the mod procedure. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22(4):1240-1246. doi:10.1097/SCS.0b013e31821c0fef
2.
KimSWShimKWPlesnilaNKimYOChoiJUKimDS. Distraction vs remodeling surgery for craniosynostosis. Child's Nerv Syst. 2007;23(2):201-206. doi:10.1007/s00381-006-0209-1
3.
ParkDHChungJYoonSH. Rotating distraction osteogenesis in 23 cases of craniosynostosis: comparison with the classical method of craniotomy and remodeling. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2010;46(2):89-100. doi:10.1159/000319005
4.
RunyanCMGabrickKSParkJG, et al.Long-term outcomes of spring-assisted surgery for sagittal craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;146:833-841. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000007168
5.
HowePWCooperMG. Blood loss and replacement for paediatric cranioplasty in Australia—a prospective national audit. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2012;40:107-113.
6.
PageMJMcKenzieJEBossuytPM, et al.The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.
7.
HassaneinAGFadleKN. Assessment of the outcome of calvarial vault remodeling and spring-mediated cranioplasty in the correction of isolated sagittal suture synostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2020;31(7):e747-e752. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000006807
8.
KölbyDFischerSArabK, et al.Craniotomy of the fused sagittal suture over the superior sagittal sinus is a safe procedure. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28(3):650-653. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000003440
9.
RirieDGDavidLRGlazierSSSmithTEArgentaLC. Surgical advancement influences perioperative care: a comparison of two surgical techniques for sagittal craniosynostosis repair. Anesth Analg. 2003;97(3):699-703. doi:10.1213/01.ANE.0000078575.59966.5D
10.
SakamotoYNakajimaHTamadaI. Outcome analysis of morcellation craniotomy with distraction osteogenesis for scaphocephaly. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2013;49(4):248-253. doi:10.1159/000362690
11.
WindhPDavisCSangerCSahlinPLauritzenC. Spring-Assisted Cranioplasty vs Pi-Plasty for Sagittal SynostosisYA Long Term Follow-Up Study.
12.
BelzaCCModiRNKamelGN, et al.Perioperative comparison between open cranial vault remodeling and distraction osteogenesis for unilateral lambdoid craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2023;34(4):1222-1225. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000009227
13.
TahiriYSwansonJWTaylorJA. Distraction osteogenesis versus conventional fronto-orbital advancement for the treatment of unilateral coronal synostosis: a comparison of perioperative morbidity and short-term outcomes. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(6):1904-1908. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000002020
14.
KamelGNWongASegalRM, et al.A single-center retrospective review of perioperative complications and reoperation rates between open cranial vault remodeling and distraction osteogenesis for unilateral coronal craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(7):2373-2378. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000007831
15.
MarchacDRenierD. Treatment of Craniosynostosis in Infancy. Clin Plast Surg. 1987;14(1). doi:10.1016/S0094-1298(20)30697-0
16.
LaneLC. Pioneer craniectomy for relief of mental imbecility due to premature sutural closure and microcephalus. J Am Med Assoc. 1892;18(2):49-50. doi:10.1001/jama.1892.02411060019001f
17.
LannelongueM. De la craniectomie dans la microcephalie. CR Acad Sci. 1890;110:1382-1385.
18.
EngelMFreudlspergerCHoffmannJMühlingJCastrillón-OberndorferGSeebergerR. Surgical outcome after using a modified technique of the pi-procedure for posterior sagittal suture closure. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012;40(8). doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2012.01.024
19.
ShillitoJJrMatsonDD.Craniosynostosis: a review of 519 surgical patients. Pediatrics. 1968;41(4):829-853.
20.
MarupudiNIReisenBRozzelleASoodS. Endoscopy in craniosynostosis surgery: evolution and current trends. J Pediatr Neurosci. 2022;17(Suppl 1):S44-S53.
21.
TessierP. The definitive plastic surgical treatment of the severe facial deformities of craniofacial dysostosis: Crouzon’s and Apert’s diseases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971;48(5):419-442.
22.
TessierP. Relationship of craniostenoses to craniofacial dysostoses, and to faciostenoses: a study with therapeutic implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1971;48(3):224-237.
23.
ArtsSDelyeHVan LindertEJ. Intraoperative and postoperative complications in the surgical treatment of craniosynostosis: minimally invasive versus open surgical procedures. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018;21(2):112-118. doi:10.3171/2017.7.PEDS17155
HallénTMalteseGOlssonRTarnowPKölbyL. Cranioplasty without periosteal dissection reduces blood loss in Pi-plasty surgery for sagittal synostosis. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2017;52(4):284-287. doi:10.1159/000477444
26.
MuhlyWTTanJMHsuG, et al.Care standardization reduces blood donor exposures and transfusion in complex cranial vault reconstruction. Hosp Pediatr. 2018;8(10):595-603. doi:10.1542/hpeds.2018-0027
JimenezDFBaroneCM. Intraoperative autologous blood-transfusion in the surgical-correction of craniosynostosis. Neurosurgery. 1995;37(6). doi:10.1227/00006123-199512000-00006
29.
HormoziAKMahdaviNMehdi ForoozanfarM, et al.Effect of Perioperative Management on Outcome of Patients after Craniosynostosis Surgery. www.wjps.ir
30.
OngunEADursunOKazanMSNurBMihçiE. Early postoperative follow-up after craniosynostosis surgery. Turk J Med Sci. 2018;48(3):584-591. doi:10.3906/sag-1711-29
31.
D’amoreALRasmussenMChristensenL, et al.Intra-And postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirements in children undergoing craniofacial surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(6):1798-1801. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000005492
32.
JonesVMThomasSGSiskaR, et al.Spring-Assisted surgery for treatment of sagittal craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(1):164-167. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000007096
33.
SpazzapanPKocarMEberlincAHaberBVelnarT. Craniofacial reconstructions in children with craniosynostosis. J Integr Neurosci. 2022;21(4). doi:10.31083/j.jin2104106
34.
PatelVShakirSYangR, et al.Perioperative outcomes in the treatment of isolated sagittal synostosis: cranial vault remodeling versus spring mediated cranioplasty. J Craniofac Surg. 2020;31(7):2106-2111. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000006838
35.
DavidLRPlikaitisCMCoutureDGlazierSSArgentaLC. Outcome analysis of our first 75 spring-assisted surgeries for scaphocephaly. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21(1):3-9. doi:10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181c3469d
BakriSMazeedASSaiedS, et al.Introduction of spring-assisted cranioplasty for sagittal craniosynostosis in a craniofacial service: a report of early experience. J Craniofac Surg. 2023;34(3):899-903. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000009065
38.
ThomasGPLJohnsonDByrenJC, et al.Long-term morphological outcomes in nonsyndromic sagittal craniosynostosis: a comparison of 2 techniques. J Craniofac Surg. 2015;26(1):19-25. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000001107
39.
RodgersWGlassGESchievanoS, et al.Spring-assisted cranioplasty for the correction of nonsyndromic scaphocephaly: a quantitative analysis of 100 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017;140:125-134. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000003465
40.
BaroneCMFerderMJimenezDF, et al.Distraction of the frontal bone outside the cranial plane a rabbit model. J Craniofac Surg. 1993;4(3). doi:10.1097/00001665-199307000-00013
41.
ParkDHYoonSH. The trans-sutural distraction osteogenesis for 22 cases of craniosynostosis: a new, easy, safe, and efficient method in craniosynostosis surgery. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2012;47(3):167-175. doi:10.1159/000330708
42.
VeithJJohnsDMehtaST, et al.Serial posterior cranial vault distraction for the treatment of Complex craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(1):32-35. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000006835
43.
BarrientosSMillerJ. Anterior cranial vault reconstruction with distraction for primary and secondary craniosynostosis repair. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(2):E109-E112. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000005011
44.
AkaiTIizukaHKawakamiS. Treatment of craniosynostosis by distraction osteogenesis. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2006;42(5):288-292. doi:10.1159/000094064
TunçbilekGKonaşEÇalişMUstunGGBilginerB. Distraction of fronto-orbital segment as a nonvascularized bone graft in craniosynostotic patients. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28(7):1670-1674. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000003605
47.
DrapeauAIParkerWTownsendSPearsonGD. Improving the timely availability of blood products for patients undergoing craniosynostosis surgery. Perioper Care Oper Room Manag. 2021;25. doi:10.1016/j.pcorm.2021.100207
48.
ParkCWormaldJMirandaBHOngJHareAEcclesS. Perioperative blood loss and transfusion in craniosynostosis surgery. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(1):112-115. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000004098
49.
BonfieldCMSharmaJCochraneDDSinghalASteinbokP. Minimizing blood transfusions in the surgical correction of craniosynostosis: a 10-year single-center experience. Child's Nerv Syst. 2016;32(1):143-151. doi:10.1007/s00381-015-2900-6
50.
ChowIPurnellCAGosainAK. Assessing the impact of blood loss in cranial vault remodeling: a risk assessment model using the 2012 to 2013 pediatric national surgical quality improvement program data sets. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(6):1249-1260. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000001783
51.
SteinbokPHeranNHicdonmezTCochraneDDPriceA. Minimizing blood transfusions in the surgical correction of coronal and metopic craniosynostosis. Child's Nerv Syst. 2004;20(7):445-452. doi:10.1007/s00381-004-0972-9
52.
StrickerPALinEEFiadjoeJESussmanEMJobesDR. Absence of tachycardia during hypotension in children undergoing craniofacial reconstruction surgery. Anesth Analg. 2012;115(1):139-146. doi:10.1213/ANE.0b013e318253708c
53.
SadeghiAMalekianzadehBAhmadizadehNMahdaviA. Reliability of visually estimated blood loss with hemoglobin measurement: 200 cases of craniosynostosis surgery. Int J Pediatr. 2018;6(9). doi:10.22038/ijp.2018.29258.2562
54.
PearsonAMatavaCT. Anaesthetic management for craniosynostosis repair in children. BJA Educ. 2016;16(12):410-416. doi:10.1093/bjaed/mkw023
55.
ThomasKHughesCJohnsonDDasS. Anesthesia for surgery related to craniosynostosis: a review. Part 1. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012;22(11):1033-1041. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03927.x
56.
Guimarães-FerreiraJGewalliFDavidLOlssonRFriedeHLauritzenCGK. Spring-mediated cranioplasty compared with the modified pi-plasty for sagittal synostosis. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2003;37(4):208-215. doi:10.1080/02844310310001823
57.
KomuroYYanaiAHayashiAMiyajimaMNakanishiHAraiH. Treatment of Unilateral Lambdoid Synostosis With Cranial Distraction.
58.
Di RoccoFUsamiKProtzenkoTColletCGiraudatKArnaudE. Results and limits of posterior cranial vault expansion by osteotomy and internal distractors. Surg Neurol Int. 2018;9(1). doi:10.4103/SNI.SNI_465_17
59.
DerderianCAWinkJDMcGrathJLCollinsworthARSBartlettSPTaylorJA. Volumetric changes in cranial vault expansion: comparison of fronto-orbital advancement and posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135(6):1665-1672. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000001294
60.
GoldsteinJAPaligaJTWinkJDLowDWBartlettSPTaylorJA. A craniometric analysis of posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(6):1367-1375. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e31828bd541
61.
SalokorpiNVuolloVSinikumpuJJ, et al.Increases in cranial volume with posterior cranial vault distraction in 31 consecutive cases. Neurosurgery. 2017;81(5):803-811. doi:10.1093/neuros/nyx125
62.
BruceWJChangVJoyceCJCobbANMaduekweUIPatelPA. Age at time of craniosynostosis repair predicts increased complication rate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;55(5):649-654. doi:10.1177/1055665617725215
63.
PersingJA. MOC-PS(SM) CME article: management considerations in the treatment of craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121(4 Suppl):1-11. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000305929.40363.bf
64.
AbdallahAGündaǧ PapakerMBaloǧluG. An open cranial vault remodeling procedure for craniosynostosis: a retrospective study. J Child Sci. 2022;12(1):E212-E223. doi:10.1055/s-0042-1758809
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
