Abstract
Objective
This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of solely using local anesthetics for cleft lip repair and/or revision in adolescent and adult patients.
Design
Systematic review.
Setting
Clinical studies describing the use of local anesthetics in cleft lip repair procedures.
Patients, Participants
A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Inclusion criteria were studies focusing exclusively on local anesthetic techniques in adolescent or adult patients undergoing cleft lip procedures. Non-English studies, studies involving patients under the age of 10, or those undergoing cleft palate or other otolaryngological procedures were excluded. Risk of bias was addressed by using a modified Downs and Black checklist.
Interventions
Review of local anesthetic use alone for adult and adolescent patients undergoing cleft lip repair or revision.
Main Outcomes
The main studied outcomes were any reported general perioperative complications, the necessity of switching to general anesthesia, patients’ self-reported pain during the surgery, wound dehiscence, wound infection, and the need for postoperative narcotics for pain control.
Results
The included studies demonstrated consistent evidence supporting the sole use of local anesthesia for cleft lip repair and revision, with absence of wound dehiscence or infection. Most patients reported minimal to no pain and required no general anesthesia during the procedures.
Conclusions
The current literature supports the safety and efficacy of local anesthesia alone for cleft lip repair and revision procedures. This modality offers a promising approach in resource-limited countries where access to general anesthesia is often limited.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
