Abstract
Objective
As a follow-up study, we solicited opinions a decade later from fellowship-trained craniofacial surgeons to explore shifting perspectives on their training and assess the impacts on careers and practice patterns.
Design
An anonymous 26-question survey was sent to all surgeons completing craniofacial fellowships in 2013. Additionally, current craniofacial fellowship descriptions were tabulated to assess variations in program experiences.
Results
With a 47% response rate out of 30 original respondents, 14% reported no longer practicing craniofacial surgery. Among those still engaged, 42% described no longer performing intracranial/midfacial osteotomies, with 21% desiring more intracranial/midfacial volumes, 29% more cleft/orthognathic, and 30% less pediatric plastic surgery. Surprisingly, 31% reported in retrospect they would have chosen a different training program. Fifty percent had changed jobs since fellowship, with 50% practicing at centers with an average of 4.5 craniofacial surgeons. A review of current craniofacial fellowship descriptions revealed aside from intracranial/midface and cleft training, an additional 29 different surgical procedure types were advertised.
Conclusions
This follow-up assessment suggests most trainees remain active in craniofacial surgery, but many expressed dissatisfaction with their training. Almost one-third indicated they would have selected a different program, raising questions about the perceived quality of training. Considering the diversity of procedures currently falling under the craniofacial marque, a clearer description of expected case volumes might improve reported levels of fulfillment. An additional consideration is restricting the term craniofacial to programs focused on intracranial/midfacial surgery, while developing more descriptive alternative labels that better reflect the unique surgical experiences provided at each center.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
