To assess whether patients with craniosynostosis differ in age at diagnosis, age at surgery, time from presentation to surgery, and receipt of minimally invasive versus open surgery according to their relative neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage, as assessed by area deprivation index (ADI).
Design
Single-center retrospective cohort study.
Setting
Academic tertiary care center.
Patients
124 patients undergoing primary craniosynostosis repair from 2010 to 2023.
Main Outcome Measures
State area deprivation index quintile, age at diagnosis, age at surgery, time from presentation to surgery, operative approach of surgery (minimally invasive vs. open).
Results
Overall, 58.1% of patients were treated with minimally invasive surgery. A higher ADI quintile, indicating greater socioeconomic disadvantage, was associated with older age at diagnosis (Spearman's ρ=.264, P = .003), older age at primary surgery (Spearman's ρ=.291, P = .001), and increased time from presentation to surgery (Spearman's ρ=.179, P = .046). After adjusting for age at presentation, a higher ADI was also associated with an increased likelihood of undergoing open surgery (OR 1.516, 95% CI 1.032-2.225, P = .034).
Conclusions
In this group of patients undergoing primary craniosynostosis repair, those from more disadvantaged neighborhoods were more likely to be older at presentation and at surgery. They were also more likely to undergo open repair after adjusting for age at diagnosis, suggesting that extrinsic factors may differentially influence the selection of operative approach. Further outreach and advocacy efforts to improve equitable access to minimally invasive surgery are likely to help alleviate socioeconomic disparities in perioperative and long-term outcomes for patients with craniosynostosis.
Shlobin NA, Baticulon RE, Ortega CA, Du L, Bonfield CM, Wray A, Forrest CR, Dewan M.Global epidemiology of craniosynostosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2022;164:413–423.e3. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2022.05.093
2.
Sullivan LE, Li R, Tong VS, Jagasia P, Bonfield CM, Golinko M, Pontell M.Craniosynostosis: Current evaluation and management. Ann Plast Surg. 2024;93(6S Suppl 3):S144–S149. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004131
3.
Patel A, Yang JF, Hashim PW, Travieso R, Terner J, Mayes L, Kanev P, Duncan C, Jane Jr J, Jane Sr J,et al.The impact of age at surgery on long-term neuropsychological outcomes in sagittal craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(4):608e–617e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000000511
4.
BaroneCMJimenezDF. Endoscopic craniectomy for early correction of craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104(7):1965–1973. doi:10.1097/00006534-199912000-00003. discussion 1974-1975.
5.
JimenezDFBaroneCM. Endoscopic technique for sagittal synostosis. Childs Nerv Syst. 2012;28(9):1333–1339. doi:10.1007/s00381-012-1768-y
6.
ChoudharyEdgarRamanAlkureishiPurnell . Craniometric and aesthetic outcomes in craniosynostosis surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. Published online October 19, 2023. doi:10.1177/10556656231204506
7.
HorneMJPatelIGajjarAARudolphCAdamoMABraySMC. Isolated sagittal craniosynostosis and open or endoscopic cranial vault remodeling: An evaluation of developmental outcomes. J Craniofac Surg. Published online December 19, 2024. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000010983
8.
AbbottMMRogersGFProctorMRBusaKMearaJG. Cost of treating sagittal synostosis in the first year of life. J Craniofac Surg. 2012;23(1):88–93. doi:10.1097/SCS.0b013e318240f965
9.
Melin AA, Moffitt J, Hopkins DC, Shah MN, Fletcher SA, Sandberg DI, Teichgraeber JF, Grieves MR.Is less actually more? An evaluation of surgical outcomes between endoscopic suturectomy and open cranial vault remodeling for craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2020;31(4):924–926. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000006152
10.
RochlinDHSheckterCCLorenzHPKhoslaRK. Nationwide perioperative analysis of endoscopic versus open surgery for craniosynostosis: Equal access, unequal outcomes. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(1):149–153. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000007178
11.
Skolnick GB, Yu JL, Patel KB, David LR, Couture DE, Smyth MD, Woo AS.Comparison of 2 sagittal craniosynostosis repair techniques: Spring-assisted surgery versus endoscope-assisted craniectomy with helmet molding therapy. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021;58(6):678–686. doi:10.1177/1055665620966521
12.
Blum JD, Ng JJ, Craig J, Smith R, Kota A, Moura SP, Ford AD, Kalluri MH, Garland C, Cho D.Sociodemographic disparities in craniosynostosis: A systematic review. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025;62(1):87–96. doi:10.1177/10556656231199832
13.
Bakovic M, Starsiak L, Bennett S, McCaffrey R, Mantilla-Rivas E, Manrique M, Rogers GF, Oh AK.Socioeconomic influence on surgical management and outcomes in patients with craniosynostosis - A systematic review. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. Published online June 17, 2024. doi:10.1177/10556656241261838
14.
Akbari SHA, Mooney J, Lepard J, Arynchyna-Smith A, McClugage S, Myers R, Grant J, Rozzelle C, Johnston JM.Racial differences in the care of pediatric sagittal craniosynostosis: A single-institution cohort study affecting state medicaid policy. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2023;32(4):464–471. doi:10.3171/2023.5.PEDS2335
15.
HoffmanCValentiABOdigieEWarrenKPremaratneIDImahiyeroboTA. Impact of health disparities on treatment for single-suture craniosynostosis in an era of multimodal care. Neurosurg Focus. 2021;50(4):E13. doi:10.3171/2021.1.FOCUS201000
16.
KriegerNWatermanPChenJTSoobaderMJSubramanianSVCarsonR. Zip code caveat: Bias due to spatiotemporal mismatches between zip codes and US census-defined geographic areas—the public health disparities geocoding project. Am J Public Health. 2002;92(7):1100–1102. doi:10.2105/ajph.92.7.1100
17.
ChaconMACookCAFlynn-O’BrienKZagoryJAChoiPMWilsonNA. Assessing the impact of neighborhood and built environment on pediatric perioperative care: A systematic review of the literature. J Pediatr Surg. 2024;59(7):1378–1387. doi:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.03.033
KindAJHBuckinghamWR. Making neighborhood-disadvantage metrics accessible - the neighborhood atlas. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(26):2456–2458. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1802313
20.
Varagur K, Murphy J, Ochoa E, Skolnick GB, Naidoo SD, McEvoy SD, Strahle JM, Patel KB.Impact of neighborhood deprivation and social vulnerability on long-term outcomes and desire for revision in patients with craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2023;32(3):257–266. doi:10.3171/2023.4.PEDS2343
21.
HengartnerACSerratoPSayeedSSadeghzadehSPrassinosAJAlperovichMDiLunaMElsamadicyAA. Sociodemographic disparities and postoperative outcomes following cranial vault remodeling for craniosynostosis: Analysis of the 2012 to 2021 NSQIP-pediatric database. J Craniofac Surg. 2024;35(5):1310–1314. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000010303
22.
TanSPKProctorMRMullikenJBRogersGF. Early frontofacial symmetry after correction of unilateral coronal synostosis: Frontoorbital advancement vs endoscopic strip craniectomy and helmet therapy. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24(4):1190–1194. doi:10.1097/SCS.0b013e318299742e
23.
Al-Shaqsi SZ, Lam NW, Forrest CR, Phillips JH.Long-term outcomes of spring-assisted surgery for sagittal craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;146(4):833–841. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000007168
24.
Al-ShaqsiSZLamNWForrestCRPhillipsJH. Endoscopic versus open total vault reconstruction of sagittal craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(3):915–919. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000007307
25.
BeckerDBPetersenJDKaneAACradockMMPilgramTKMarshJL. Speech, cognitive, and behavioral outcomes in nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(2):400–407. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000172763.71043.b8
26.
WittersLVercruysseHDe PraeterM. Total cranial vault remodelling versus minimally invasive suturectomy with postoperative helmet therapy in sagittal craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2025;36(1):172–176. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000010666
27.
BadieeRKMaruJYangSCAlconARosenbluthGPomerantzJH. Racial and socioeconomic disparities in prompt craniosynostosis workup and treatment. J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(8):2422–2426. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000008815
28.
VogelTWWooASKaneAAPatelKBNaidooSDSmythMD. A comparison of costs associated with endoscope-assisted craniectomy versus open cranial vault repair for infants with sagittal synostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014;13(3):324–331. doi:10.3171/2013.12.PEDS13320
29.
Iyer RR, Ye X, Jin Q, Lu Y, Liyanage L, Ahn ES.Complications in helmet therapy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012;40(4):341–346. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2011.05.007
30.
IyerRRYeXLuJQLiyanageYAhnLSE. Optimal duration of postoperative helmet therapy following endoscopic strip craniectomy for sagittal craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018;22(6):610–615. doi:10.3171/2018.5.PEDS184
31.
Kestle JRW, Lee A, Anderson RCE, Gociman B, Patel KB, Smyth MD, Birgfeld C, Pollack IF, Goldstein J, Tamber M, et al.Evaluation of the patient-practitioner consultation on surgical treatment options for patients with craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2020;31(5):1186–1190. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000006327
32.
Belza CC, Sheahan L, Blum J, Becker M, Oca M, Lopes K, Gosman AA.Variation in the management of isolated craniosynostosis: A survey of the synostosis research group. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018;22(6):627–631. doi:10.3171/2018.7.PEDS18132
33.
Runyan CM, Park JG, Blaha L, Gabrick KS, Townsend RK, Owens E, Couture DE, David LR.Geospatial and socioeconomic disparities influencing the management of craniosynostosis. Ann Plast Surg. 2024;92(5S Suppl 3):S345–S351. doi:10.1097/SAP.0000000000003800
34.
Hengartner AC, Serrato P, Sayeed S, Sadeghzadeh S, Prassinos AJ, Alperovich M, DiLuna M, Elsamadicy AA.Outcomes of endoscopic versus open spring assisted surgery for sagittal craniosynostosis. J Craniofac Surg. 2020;31(7):2088–2091. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000006709
