Abstract
Objective
Bilateral cleft lip outcomes are heavily influenced by original anatomic deformity, but a reliable and widely accepted classification of preoperative severity has yet to emerge. This study validates the Bilateral Cleft Lip Severity Index (BCLSI) by assessing interrater reliability and the relationship between preoperative severity and aesthetic outcomes.
Design
Retrospective cohort study.
Setting
Tertiary care pediatric hospital.
Patients/Participants
Patients who underwent lip repair for bilateral cleft lip.
Interventions
Cleft surgeons and layperson raters graded preoperative cleft severity.
Main Outcome Measure(s)
Anthropometric analyses and crowdsourced aesthetic assessments using Likert scales and pairwise comparisons.
Results
Intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.94 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-0.97) among cleft surgeon raters (n = 7), 0.84 (95% CI 0.73-0.92) among layperson raters (n = 10), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.80-0.94) in the combined group (n = 17). Among 18 patients, a higher BCLSI correlated with a greater columellar–labial angle (r = 0.686, P = .002). BCLSI predicted pairwise rank-derived coefficients (β = −1.289, P = .015), lateral ratings (β = 0.752, P < .001), frontal ratings (β = 0.440, P = .038), and composite ratings (β = 0.551, P = .006) independent of age at surgery, age at postoperative photograph, history of nasoalveolar molding, lip repair technique, sex, and race. A greater columellar–labial angle correlated with poor lateral (r = .729, P < .001) and composite (r = .471, P = .048) ratings.
Conclusions
The BCLSI demonstrates good interrater reliability among cleft surgeons and layperson raters. A higher BCLSI correlated with a greater columellar–labial angle and predicted poorer nasal appearance ratings by crowdsourced layperson assessments at 5 years postoperatively. The BCLSI is a simple, reliable, and informative tool that can standardize bilateral cleft lip classification and advance cleft outcomes research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
