Abstract
Objective
To evaluate and compare perioperative outcomes and hospital charges between spring-assisted cranioplasty (SAC) and open cranial vault remodeling (OCVR) for single-suture craniosynostosis, with primary analysis focused on sagittal synostosis.
Design
Retrospective cost analysis.
Setting
Single tertiary academic center.
Patients, Participants
Patients diagnosed with single-suture craniosynostosis who underwent surgical repair between 2012 and 2024.
Interventions
Surgical repair via SAC or OCVR.
Main Outcome Measure(s)
Primary outcomes included operating room, anesthesia, intensive care unit (ICU), non-ICU, and total hospital charges. Secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusion volume, and need for subsequent craniofacial surgery.
Results
Analysis was restricted to sagittal synostosis to ensure cohort comparability. SAC patients were younger at surgery (3.7 ± 1.1 vs. 16.2 ± 19.2 months; p < .001) and had reduced blood donor exposure (0.86 ± 0.45 vs. 1.24 ± 0.77; p = .019) and shorter ICU (1.14 ± 0.36 vs. 1.44 ± 0.66 days, p = .029) and hospital stay (3.3 ± 0.5 vs. 5.1 ± 0.5 days; p < .001) compared with OCVR. Total EBL was similar between groups (18.8 ± 4.0 vs. 19.1 ± 2.7 mL/kg; p = .92), although blood loss at spring removal was minimal. ICU charges were lower for SAC ($3846 ± 1695 vs. $4830 ± 2428; p = .045), while operating-room, anesthesia, and total hospital charges were comparable (p > .05). Subsequent craniofacial surgery was less frequent following SAC (6.3% vs. 35.6%; p = .003), with all SAC reoperations representing planned staged procedures.
Conclusions
In this institutional series of sagittal synostosis repairs, SAC was associated with lower ICU charges, fewer unique blood donor exposures, and fewer subsequent craniofacial procedures compared with OCVR. Although cumulative EBL and operative duration were similar, SAC redistributed blood loss across two shorter operations separated by several months, with minimal blood loss at removal and shorter hospitalization. These findings support SAC as a safe and efficient approach for appropriately selected infants with sagittal synostosis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
