To compare dentoskeletal, nasal septal, and upper airway changes following rapid maxillary expansion (RME) using Hyrax and fan-type expanders in growing patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Design
Prospective comparative clinical study.
Setting
University-based tertiary care dental institution.
Patients
Twenty patients aged 9 to 15 years with repaired unilateral or bilateral CLP and transverse maxillary deficiency.
Interventions
Participants were treated with bonded Hyrax (n = 10) or fan-type expanders (n = 10) according to maxillary constriction pattern. CBCT scans were obtained before expansion (T0) and after a 3-month retention period (T1).
Main Outcome Measures
Anteroposterior, vertical, and transverse dentoskeletal parameters, nasal septum deviation, and oropharyngeal airway volume were evaluated. Intragroup comparisons used the Wilcoxon signed-rank test; intergroup comparisons used the Mann-Whitney U test (P < .05).
Results
Both appliances achieved significant transverse expansion. The fan-type expander showed greater anterior basal widening, whereas the Hyrax demonstrated greater posterior expansion and nasal cavity width increase. Airway volume increased but was not statistically significant.
Conclusions
Both expanders effectively correct transverse maxillary deficiency in CLP patients. Appliance selection should be based on constriction pattern. Airway effects appear limited.
MosseyPALittleJMungerRGDixonMJShawWC. Cleft lip and palate. Lancet. 2009;374(9703):1773–1785. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60695-4
2.
DixonMJMarazitaMLBeatyTHMurrayJC. Cleft lip and palate: Understanding genetic and environmental influences. Nat Rev Genet.2011;12(3):167–178. doi:10.1038/nrg2933
3.
JugessurAFarliePGKilpatrickN. The genetics of isolated orofacial clefts: From genotypes to Subphenotypes. Oral Dis.2009;15(7):437–453. doi:10.1111/j.1601-0825.2009.01577.x
CroenLAShawGMWassermanCRTolarováMM. Racial and ethnic variations in the prevalence of orofacial clefts. Am J Med Genet.1998;79(1):42–47.<42::AID-AJMG11>3.0.CO;2-M
6.
ReddySGReddyRRBronkhorstEMPrasadREttemaAMSailerHF. Incidence of cleft lip and palate in the state of Andhra Pradesh, south India. Indian J Plast Surg.2010;43(2):184–189. doi:10.4103/0970-0358.73443
7.
BerkowitzS. Cleft Lip and Palate: Diagnosis and Management. 3rd ed. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2013.
8.
ShetyePR. Orthodontic management of patients with cleft lip and palate. Semin Plast Surg. 2012;26(2):108–115.
9.
ChaturvediS. Role of an orthodontist in cleft lip and palate. J Oral Health Craniofac Sci. 2020;5(2):103–105.
10.
Borzabadi-FarahaniA. Orthodontic considerations in cleft lip and palate. In: GraberLWVanarsdallRLVigKWLHuangGJ, eds. Orthodontics: current principles and techniques. 6th ed. St. Louis, MO, USA: Elsevier; 2022:1002–1030.
11.
Figueiredo DSF, Bartolomeo FUC, Romualdo CR, Palomo JM, Horta MCR, Andrade I Jr., Oliveira DD. Dentoskeletal effects of three maxillary expanders in patients with clefts: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop.2014;146(1):73–81. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.04.013
12.
PetersonPParikakisKKarstenA. Facial growth in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate at 19 years of age after different surgical protocols. Eur J Orthod.2025;47(2). doi:10.1093/ejo/cjae066
13.
MarsMPlintDAHoustonWJBBerglandOSembG. The Goslon yardstick: A new system of assessing dental arch relationships in children with unilateral clefts of the lip and palate. Cleft Palate J. 1987;24(4):314–322.
14.
TindlundRSRyghPBøeOE. Intercanine widening and sagittal effect of maxillary transverse expansion in patients with cleft lip and palate during the deciduous and mixed dentitions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1993;30(2):195–207. doi:10.1597/1545-1569_1993_030_0195_iwaseo_2.3.co_2
15.
ShetyePR. Orthodontic management of patients with cleft lip and palate during growth. Semin Plast Surg. 2012;26(2):108–115.
16.
AndrucioliMCDMatsumotoMAN. Transverse maxillary deficiency: Treatment alternatives in face of early skeletal maturation. Dental Press J Orthod.2020;25(1):70–79. doi:10.1590/2177-6709.25.1.070-079.bbo
17.
GaribDGHenriquesJFJansonGFreitasMRCoelhoRA. Rapid maxillary expansion—tooth tissue-borne versus tooth-borne expanders: A computed tomography evaluation of dentoskeletal effects. Angle Orthodontist. 2005;75(4):548–557.
18.
DavisWMKronmanJH. Anatomical changes induced by splitting of the Midpalatal suture. Angle Orthodontist. 1969;39(2):126–132.
19.
TownendPI. Technique of rapid expansion in patients with cleft lip and palate. British Journal of Orthodontics. 1980;7(2):65–67. doi:10.1179/bjo.7.2.65
20.
Mordente CM, Palomo JM, Horta MCR, Souki BQ, Oliveira DD, Andrade I Jr.Upper airway assessment using four different maxillary expanders in cleft patients: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Angle Orthodontist. 2016;86(4):617–624. doi:10.2319/032015-174.1
21.
LevriniLFilippiV. A fan-shaped maxillary expander. Journal of Clinical Orthodontics. 1999;33(11):642–643.
22.
AlmeidaSMAlmeida-PedrinRRDalbenGCarraraCF. Rapid maxillary expansion in cleft patients with a fan-type expander: A controlled study. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2011;19(5):526–533.
23.
SebaeyAMEl-BayomySYKhalefaYH AAbdel-RahmanNI. Rapid arch expansion in cleft lip and palate children: Comparison between fan-shaped and hyrax-type expanders using CBCT. Egyptian Dental Journal. 2019;65(4):3159–3167. doi:10.21608/edj.2019.73993
24.
Pugliese F, Palomo JM, Calil LR, de Medeiros Alves A, Lauris JRP, Garib D.Dental arch size and shape after maxillary expansion in bilateral complete cleft palate: Comparison of three expander designs. Angle Orthodontist. 2020;90(2):233–238. doi:10.2319/020219-74.1
25.
CheungTOberoiS. Three-dimensional assessment of the upper airway in patients with cleft lip and palate. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43405. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043405
26.
SchulzKFAltmanDGMoherD. CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. British Medical Journal. 2010;340:c332. doi:10.1136/bmj.c332
27.
World Medical Association. World medical association declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2013;310(20):2191–2194. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.281053
28.
American Cleft Palate–Craniofacial Association. Parameters for Evaluation and Treatment of Patients with Cleft Lip/Palate or Other Craniofacial Differences. Chapel Hill, NC, USA: American Cleft Palate–Craniofacial Association; 2018.
29.
KindelanJDNashedRRBromigeMR. Orthodontic management of patients with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal. 2008;45(2):112–119. doi:10.1597/06-162.1
30.
BerglandOSembGAbyholmF. Elimination of the residual alveolar cleft by secondary bone grafting and subsequent orthodontic treatment. Cleft Palate Jour. 1986;23(3):175–205.
31.
Shaw WC, Semb G, Nelson P, Brattström V, Mølsted K, Prahl-Andersen B. The Eurocleft study: Intercenter study of treatment outcome in patients with complete cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal. 1996;33(6):469–475.
32.
Costa N, Mello BZ, da Silva Filho OG, Magnani MBBA, Capelozza Filho L, Freitas JAS.Effects of rapid maxillary expansion on nasal septum deviation in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate: A cone-beam computed tomography study. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal. 2020;57(9):1095–1103.
33.
Akay MC, Koyuncu BO, Erdur EA, Dursun E, Karakas S, Ozdiler E. Three-dimensional evaluation of nasal septal deviation in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients using cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2020;90(2):220–227. doi:10.2319/051419-329.1
34.
RaiSBhatejaS. Pharyngeal airway analysis for area and volume in patients affected by unilateral and bilateral cleft lip and palate – a comparative study. Ann Maxillofac Surg.2025;15(1):19–24. doi:10.4103/ams.ams_151_24
35.
RaiSBhatejaS. Pharyngeal airway architecture in patients with cleft lip and palate by cone-beam computed tomography: Review of literature. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2025;18(9):1168–1180. doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10005-3284
36.
American Cleft Palate–Craniofacial Association. Parameters for evaluation and treatment of patients with cleft lip/palate or other craniofacial differences. Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal. 1993;30(Suppl 1):137–156. Revised edition 2018.
37.
Lo GiudiceAPolizziALagravereMFlores-MirCIsolaGRonsivalleVLeonardiR. Changes in upper airway airflow after rapid maxillary expansion considering normal craniofacial development as a factor: A retrospective study using computational fluid dynamics. Eur J Orthod. 2025;47(1):cjae077.
