To investigate the self-perception of adults with cleft lip and palate during the treatment process, analyzing correlations among sociodemographic variables, cleft types, surgical history, and satisfaction reported through the CLEFT-Q.
Design
Observational, cross-sectional, and prospective study based on primary and secondary data. Correlation tests identified associations between clinical and psychosocial factors and self-perception scores obtained through the instrument.
Setting
National tertiary referral hospital for craniofacial anomaly treatment, in an outpatient setting.
Participants
Fifty adults aged 18-29 years, of both sexes, with cleft lip and palate, without associated syndromes. Palate clefts and cognitive impairments that hindered assessment were excluded.
Interventions
Administration of the CLEFT-Q, composed of 13 scales covering appearance, facial function, and health-related quality of life, complemented by clinical and sociodemographic data from medical records.
Main Outcome Measures
CLEFT-Q.
Results
The lowest mean scores were observed for nose (42.8 ± 24.9) and nostrils (44.3 ± 30.2), and the highest for jaw (71.0 ± 27.1) and lip scar (65.0 ± 25.3). Rhinoplasty was associated with higher esthetic satisfaction (P = .004; P = .022). The number of palate repair correlated negatively with speech and eating domains.
Conclusions
Self-perception was related to clinical variables, particularly cleft type and surgical history. The CLEFT-Q proved essential for patient-centered care, broadening the understanding of subjective outcomes in craniofacial treatment.
TrindadeIEKTrindade-SuedamIKTrindadeSHKSampaio-TeixeiraACM. Treatise on Cleft Lip and Palate: Advances in Diagnosis and Interdisciplinary Treatment. 1st ed. Thieme Revinter; 2025.
2.
MosseyPACastillaEE. Global Registry and Database on Craniofacial Anomalies. World Health Organization; 2003.
3.
OzawaTO. Craniofacial anomalies: incidence and distribution in Brazilian populations. Rev Bras Cir Craniomaxilofac. 2012. 15(2). 85-91.
4.
LewisCJacobLLehmannC. The primary care pediatrician and the care of children with cleft lip and/or cleft palate. Pediatrics. 2017;139(5):e20170628. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-0628.
5.
AbbotM. Cleft lip and palate. Pediatr Rev. 2014;35(5):177-181. doi:10.1542/pir.35.5.177
6.
OliveiraMMachadoJ. The unbearable weight of self-image: (re)presentations in the society of the spectacle. Ciênc Saúde Colet. 2021;26(7):2663-2672. doi:10.1590/1413-81232021267.08782021
7.
PazinatoLV, Bonow MP, Moraes RFP, Liebl S, Suetugo R, Pereira PPA, Freitas RS, Maluf EMCP. Quality of life of children and adolescents with cleft lip and palate from the perspective of caregivers. Rev Soc Bras Cir Craniomaxilofac. 2011;14(4):194-197.
8.
Hospital for Rehabilitation of Craniofacial Anomalies, University of São Paulo (HRAC-USP). Therapeutic Stages and Conduct: Cleft Lip and Palate, Craniofacial Anomalies, Hearing Health, Syndromes. 7th ed. HRAC-USP; 2018.
9.
SoaresMSM, Barros MS, Albuquerque ACL, Lacerda RHW, Vieira AR. Impact of cleft lip and palate treatments on quality of life: assessment using the CLEFT-Q. Res Soc Dev. 2021;10(13):e478101321370. https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21180/19079.
10.
JonesHFaulknerHLoskenA. The psychological impact of aesthetic surgery: A mini-review. Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2022;4(4):1–6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojac077.
11.
PiromchaiPSuetrongSArunpongpaisalS. Psychological status in patients seeking rhinoplasty. Clin Med Insights Ear Nose Throat. 2011;4:31-35. DOI:10.4137/CMENT.S7859
12.
AlloriACKelleyTMearaJGAlbertABonanthayaKChapmanKCunninghamMDaskalogiannakisJDe GierHHeggieAA, et al.A standard set of outcome measures for the comprehensive appraisal of cleft care. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2017;54(1):540-5554. doi:10.1597/15-292
13.
Wong RiffKWYTsangarisEGoodacreTForrestCRPusicALCanoSJKlassenAF. International multiphase mixed-methods study protocol to develop a cross-cultural patient-reported outcome instrument for children and young adults with cleft lip and/or palate (CLEFT-Q). BMJ Open. 2017;7(1):e015467. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015467
14.
KlassenAFRiffKWYWLongmireNMAlbertAAllenGCAydinMABakerSBCanoSJChanAJCourtemancheDJ, et al.Psychometric findings and normative values for the CLEFT-Q based on 2,434 children and young adult patients from 12 countries. CMAJ. 2018;190(15):E455-E462. DOI:10.1503/cmaj.170289
15.
MiroshnychenkoA, Rae C, Wong Riff K, Forrest CR, Goodacre T, Swan MC, Slator R, Goldstein JA, Thoma A, Harman K, et al.Psychometric validation of the CLEFT-Q patient-reported outcome measure: A prospective study to examine cross-sectional construct validity. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2023;60(3):327-335. DOI:10.1177/10556656211062837
16.
SalineroLK, Cheung L, Villavisanis DF, Wagner CS, Barrero CE, Pontell ME, Jackson OA, Taylor JA, Low DW, Swanson JW. How does CLEFT-Q change the way we practice? A prospective study integrating patient-reported outcomes. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024;154(5):1037–1045. DOI:10.1097/PRS.00000000000011036
17.
StiernmanMKlintöKWiedelAPSchaar-JohanssonMCornefjordMSchönmeyrBStålhandGKordunerMBengtssonMManiM, et al.CLEFT-Q SwePsych protocol: A prospective observational study to investigate the psychometric characteristics test-retest reliability, responsiveness, and interpretability of CLEFT-Q. PLoS One. 2025;20(2):e0321021. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0321021
18.
GracianoMSouzaCMSLehfeldNAS. Technical–operational instruments in social work: Socioeconomic assessment of families served by HRAC-USP. Social Work & Health. 2010;9(9):163-183.
19.
RandoGMAmbrosioECPJorgePKSforzaCMenezesMde AlmeidaALPFSoaresSDalbenGSTonelloCCarraraCFC, et al.Three-dimensional anthropometric analysis of the effect of lip reconstructive surgery on children with cleft lip and palate at three different times. Children. 2024;11(7):824. DOI:10.3390/children11070824
20.
GlaeserACostaSCollaresM. Cleft lip and palate: Evaluation of the psychological impact using the rosenbergself-esteem scale. Rev Bras Cir Plást. 2018;33(2):187-195. doi:10.5935/2177-1235.2018RBCP0094
21.
AljohaniMYatesJAshleyMO’MalleyL. Evaluation of quality of life in adult individuals with cleft lip and/or palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2021;32(2):505-508. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000007071
22.
AycartMACatersonEJ. Advances in cleft lip and palate surgery. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023;59(11):1932. DOI:10.3390/medicina59111932
23.
GambleCPerssonCWilladsenEAlberyLAndersenHSZattoni AntoneliMAppelqvistMAuknerRBodlingPBowdenM, et al.Timing of primary surgery for cleft palate. N Engl J Med. 2023;389(9):795-807. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa2215162
24.
KurimoriETGaribDGraziadeiSMSathlerRDalbenGdSLaurisRCMCSouza-BroscoTVNobregaESSAlonsoNTonelloC, et al.Growth outcomes audit for unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) after 2-stage palate repair. J Craniofac Surg. 2023;34(6):1756-1759. DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000009569
25.
AntoneliMZSFukushiroAPYamashitaRPOzawaTOAlonsoNTonelloC. Speech outcomes audit for unilateral cleft lip and palate after 2-stage palate repair: Preliminary results. J Craniofac Surg. 2023;34(6):1772-1775. DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000009594
26.
WaddeSPatelDGuptaMShrivastavaAPatilP. Protocols in the management of cleft lip and palate: A systematic review. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023;124(1):101388. DOI:10.1016/j.jormas.2022.10.007
27.
HattoriYPaiBCJSaitoTChouPYLuTCChangCSChenYRLoLJ. Outcome of patients with complete cleft lip and alveolus: 20-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2025;155(4):746e-757e. DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000011622
28.
Frost MH, Schaid DJ, Sellers TA, Slezak JM, Arnold PG, Woods JE, Petty PM, Johnson JL, Sitta DL, McDonnell SK, et al.Long-term satisfaction and psychological and social function following bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. JAMA. 2000;284(3):319-324. DOI:10.1001/jama.284.3.319.
29.
HanJKimMJeongWParkJLeeSKimN, et al.Patient-reported outcomes pre- and post-surgery in patients with cleft lip and palate: An assessment of postoperative satisfaction using the CLEFT-Q. J Cranio-Maxillofac Surg. 2025;53(2):151-160. DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2024.12.004
30.
Assouline-VitaleSRuffenachLBodinFZinkSRomaryBBruant-RodierCDissauxC. Satisfaction survey of secondary rhinoplasty among unilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2023;68(2):139-144. DOI:10.1016/j.anplas.2022.07.007
