To compare parent-proxy and child self-reported quality of life (QoL) for children with cleft lip and palate (CLP) by adoptive status from China.
Design
Observational multi-site study.
Setting
Six North American cleft treatment clinics.
Participants
Children with CLP ages 8.0-10.99 years and their parents (adopted from China, N = 87; not adopted, N = 167).
Outcome Measures
Pediatric QoL Inventories (PedsQL): Parent, Child, Family Impact Module (FIM); CLEFT-Q.
Results
Multivariate analyses of covariance, adjusted for age, race, and socioeconomic status main effects (adoptive status, sex, and interactions of adoptive status with sex) and results were not significant by adoptive status, sex, or the interactions of adoptive status with sex for CLEFT-Q, Parent PedsQL FIM outcomes, or Parent/Child PedsQL subscale outcomes (Ps > .159). Parent-proxy PedsQL School was higher for females regardless of adoptive status (MD = -4.82, CI = -9.53, -.11, P = .045). Child PedsQL Social QoL was higher for children adopted from China (MD = 8.91, CI = 1.18, 16.64, P = .024), where females who were adopted reported higher PedsQL social scores than females who were not adopted (MD = 11.83, CI = 3.09, 20.57, P = .008). Females who were adopted reported higher Cleft-Q Social scores than males who were adopted (MD = -6.95, CI = -18.54, -.54, P = .038).
Conclusions
Child and Family QoL was comparable between children with CLP, aged 8-10 years, who were and were not adopted. Being adopted may confer some protection for social functioning, particularly for females who are adopted.
SwansonJWSmarttJMJrSaltzmanBSBirgfeldCBGrussJSTseR. Adopted children with cleft lip and/or palate: A unique and growing population. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134(2):283e–293e. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000000391.
2.
World Health Organization Quality of Life Group. The development of the World Health Organization quality of life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). In: OrleyJKuykenW, eds. Quality of life assessment: international perspectives. Springer-Verlag; 1994:41–57.
3.
WilliamsJWakeMHeskethKMaherEWatersE. Health-related quality of life of overweight and obese children. JAMA. 2005;293(1):70–76. doi:10.1001/jama.293.1.70
4.
LimbersCARipperger-SuhlerJBouttonKRansomDVarniJW. A comparative analysis of health-related quality of life and family impact between children with ADHD treated in a general pediatric clinic and a psychiatric clinic utilizing the PedsQL. J Atten Disord. 2011;15(5):392–402. doi:10.1177/1087054709356191
5.
AlmeidaLVohraSJohnsonJAKhademiourehSDinuIRobertsonCMTJoffeARCuerraGG. Health-related quality of life in children 4-5 years after open heart surgery in early infancy. CJC Pediatr Congenit Heart Dis. 2025;4(3):140–149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjcpc.2025.01.001.
6.
AlessiDDella VecchiaSDonatiMAPrimiCSantisiSSalluceCMarinellaGBartoliniE. Health conditions and social problems in children and adolescents with epilepsy: The role of quality of life by employing the PedsQL-EM. Epilepsy Behav. 2025;172(Nov):110747. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2025.110747.
7.
MahapatraSSGuptaNMishraSBhartiSJGargRMalikPSMohanAMalhotraRKBhatnagarSKumarV. Psychological distress and quality of life during chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: prospective observational study. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2025. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2025-005463.
8.
KramerFJBaethgeCSinikovicBSchliephakeH. An analysis of quality of life in 130 families having small children with cleft lip/palate using the impact on family scale. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;36(12):1146–1152. doi:10.1016/j.ijom.2007.06.009.
9.
KramerFJGruberRFialkaFSinikovicBHahnWSchliephakeH. Quality of life in school-age children with orofacial clefts and their families. J Craniofac Surg. 2009;20(6):2061–2066. doi:10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181be8892
10.
SagheriDRavens-SiebererUBraumannBvon MackensenS. An evaluation of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a group of 4-7 year-old children with cleft lip and palate. J Orofac Orthop. 2009;70(4):274–284. doi:10.1007/s00056-009-9906-1
StoneMBBottoLDFeldkampMLSmithKRRolingLYamashiroDAlderSC. Improving quality of life of children with oral clefts: Perspectives of parents. J Craniofac Surg. 2010;21(5):1358–1364. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181ec6872.
13.
SundellALTörnhageCJMarcussonA. A comparison of health-related quality of life in 5- and 10-year-old Swedish children with and without cleft lip and/or palate. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2017;27(4):238–246. doi:10.1111/ipd.12253
14.
HeppnerCECrerandCECrilly BellucciCSheikhFWoodardSAlbertMConradALKapp-SimonKA. A multisite study investigating child and parent proxy reported quality of life in children with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2023;60(11):1474–1483. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656221105766.
15.
de Oliveira JúniorAGMontagnaEZaiaVBarbosaCPBiancoB. Oral health-related quality of life in patients aged 8 to 19 years with cleft lip and palate: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):670. Published 2023 Sep 16. doi:10.1186/s12903-023-03382-4
16.
CollettBRKeich CloonanYSpeltzMLAnderkaMWerlerMM. Psychosocial functioning in children with and without orofacial clefts and their parents. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2012;49(4):397–405. doi:10.1597/10-007
17.
TannurePNSoaresFMKüchlerECMottaLGCostaMCGranjeiroJM. Measuring the impact of quality of life of children treated for orofacial clefts: A case-control study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013;37(4):381–384. doi:10.17796/jcpd.37.4.f185423j04m66753
18.
EslamiNMajidiMRAliakbarianMHasanzadehN. Oral health-related quality of life in children with cleft lip and palate. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24(4):e340–e343. doi:10.1097/SCS.0b013e31828b743b
19.
MarcussonAPaulinGOstrupL. Facial appearance in adults who had cleft lip and palate treated in childhood. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2002;36(1):16–23. doi:10.1080/028443102753478327
20.
SinkoKJagschRPrechtlVWatzingerFHollmannKBaumannA. Evaluation of esthetic, functional, and quality-of-life outcome in adult cleft lip and palate patients. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;42(4):355–361. doi:10.1597/03-142.1
21.
TopolskiTDEdwardsTCPatrickDL. Quality of life: How do adolescents with facial differences compare with other adolescents?Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;42(1):25–32. doi:10.1597/03-097.3.1
22.
StraussRPRamseyBLEdwardsTCTopolskiTDKapp-SimonKA. Stigma experiences in youth with facial differences: A multi-site study of adolescents and their mothers. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2007;10(2):96–103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-6343.2007.00383.x.
23.
BosAPrahlC. Oral health-related quality of life in Dutch children with cleft lip and/or palate. Angle Orthod. 2011;81(5):865–871. doi:10.2319/070110-365.1
24.
LinJFangXHaPFuMWangH. Oral health-related quality of life in Chinese children with orofacial cleft. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020;57(8):931–937. doi:10.1177/1055665620908426
25.
DunworthKHernandezJAChingJGoldenBNguyenPDPatelKRogers-VizenaCRRottgersSAAlloriAC. Aesthetic outcomes in cleft care: Exploring patterns in patient-reported outcomes across adolescence. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024;154(4):841–853. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011098.
26.
ManiMCarlssonMMarcussonA. Quality of life varies with gender and age among adults treated for unilateral cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2010;47(5):491–498. doi:10.1597/08-281
27.
LockerDJokovicATompsonB. Health-related quality of life of children aged 11 to 14 years with orofacial conditions. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2005;42(3):260–266. doi:10.1597/03-077.1
28.
BroderHLWilson-GendersonMSischoLNormanRG. Examining factors associated with oral health-related quality of life for youth with cleft. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133(6):828e–834e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000000221
29.
KortelainenTTolvanenMLuotoAYlikontiolaLPSándorGKLahtiS. Comparison of oral health-related quality of life among schoolchildren with and without cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2016;53(5):e172–e176. doi:10.1597/14-180
30.
Corrêa de Queiroz HerkrathAPHerkrathFJBessa RebeloMAVettoreMV. Determinants of health-related and oral health-related quality of life in adults with orofacial clefts: A cross-sectional study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2018;55(9):1244–1257. doi:10.1177/1055665618763377
31.
Leopoldo-RodadoMPantoja-PertegalFBelmonte-CaroRGarcia-PerlaAGonzalez-CarderoEInfante-CossioP. Quality of life in early age Spanish children treated for cleft lip and/or palate: A case-control study approach. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(2):477–485. doi:10.1007/s00784-020-03394-2
32.
BroderHLWilson-GendersonMSischoL. Oral health-related quality of life in youth receiving cleft-related surgery: Self-report and proxy ratings. Qual Life Res. 2017;26(4):859–867. doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1420-5
33.
SharmaARMcGueMKBensonPL. The psychological adjustment of United States adopted adolescents and their nonadopted siblings. Child Dev. 1998;69(3):791–802.
34.
JufferFvan IjzendoornMH. Behavior problems and mental health referrals of international adoptees: A meta-analysis. JAMA. 2005;293(20):2501–2515. doi:10.1001/jama.293.20.2501
35.
MerzECMcCallRB. Behavior problems in children adopted from psychosocially depriving institutions. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2010;38(4):459–470. doi:10.1007/s10802-009-9383-4
36.
JulianMMMcCallRB. Social skills in children adopted from socially-emotionally depriving institutions. Adopt Q. 2016;19(1):44–62. doi:10.1080/10926755.2015.1088106
37.
YoonGWestermeyerJWarwickMKuskowskiMA. Substance use disorders and adoption: Findings from a national sample. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49655. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0049655
38.
HoweD. Parent-reported problems in 211 adopted children: Some risk and protective factors. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1997;38(4):401–411. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01525.x
39.
FensboC. Mental and behavioural outcome of inter-ethnic adoptees: A review of the literature. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2004;13(2):55–63. doi:10.1007/s00787-004-0358-2
40.
GunnarMRvan DulmenMH. International adoption project team. Behavior problems in postinstitutionalized internationally adopted children. Dev Psychopathol. 2007;19(1):129–148. doi:10.1017/S0954579407070071
41.
van VeenMMvan den BergeBAMouës-VinkCM. Quality of life of adopted Chinese versus nonadopted Dutch children with cleft lip and/or palate: A propensity score matched analysis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022;59(12):1502–1508. doi:10.1177/10556656211050795
42.
SalineroLKAhluwaliaVSBarreroCEWagnerCSPontellMEMageeLLowDWJacksonOANapoliJABartlettSP, et al.Long-Term patient-reported outcomes in internationally adopted children with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025;62(1):44–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656231198647.
43.
EverhartSACochranKMLambrouNHDaviesWHMarikPK. Psychosocial experiences that support positive self-concept in children with cleft lip and palate adopted from China. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2022;59(12):1509–1519. doi:10.1177/10556656211051222
44.
KleinTPopeAWGetahunEThompsonJ. Mothers’ reflections on raising a child with a craniofacial anomaly. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006;43(5):590–597. doi:10.1597/05-117
45.
DesparsJPeterCBorghiniAPierrehumbertBHabersaatSMuller-NixCAnsermetFHohlfeldJ. Impact of a cleft lip and/or palate on maternal stress and attachment representations. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2011;48(4):419–424. doi:https://doi.org/10.1597/08-190.
46.
MachoPBohacMFedelesJJrFekiacovaDFedelesJSr. Impact of cleft lip and/or palate in children on family quality of life before and after reconstructive surgery. Bratisl Lek Listy. 2017;118(6):370–373. doi:10.4149/BLL_2017_070
47.
LindbergNEKynøNMFeragenKBPrippAHTønsethKA. Parental stress, infant feeding and well-being in families affected by cleft lip and/or cleft palate: The impact of early follow-up. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2025;62(5):882–893. doi:10.1177/10556656241231524
48.
StockNMBlasoDWhitePShepherdLCostaBEdmeKAsplandRHottonM. Longitudinal psychological well-being in caregivers of young children with cleft lip and/or palate. J Pediatr Psychol. 2025;50(9):831–842. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsaf029.
49.
AlinezhadDMohammadiFKharazifaredMJGholamiMSarmadiSRazeghiS. Parents’ views and experiences of raising babies born with cleft lip and palate: A qualitative study. BMC Pediatr. 2025;25(1):33. Published 2025 Jan 15. doi:10.1186/s12887-024-05379-6
50.
GrozaVRyanSD. Pre-adoption stress and its association with child behavior in domestic special needs and international adoptions. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2002;27(1-2):181–197. doi:10.1016/s0306-4530(01)00044-0
51.
GrozaVRyanSDCashSJ. Institutionalization, behavior and international adoption: Predictors of behavior problems. J Immigr Health. 2003;5(1):5–17. doi:10.1023/a:1021096028003
52.
StockNMCostaBWhitePRumseyN. Risk and protective factors for psychological distress in families following a diagnosis of cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020;57(1):88–98. doi:10.1177/1055665619862457
53.
StockNMBlasoDWhitePShepherdLCostaBEdmeKAsplandRHottonM. Longitudinal psychological well-being in caregivers of young children with cleft lip and/or palate. J Pediatr Psychol. 2025;50(9):831–842. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsaf029.
54.
LosierVCyrCDubois-ComtoisK. International adoption of cleft lip and palate children: Attachment, behavior problems, and parental sensitivity. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2020;68(May-June):101138. doi:doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101138.
55.
MalikFMarwahaR. Developmental Stages of Social Emotional Development in Children. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; September 18, 2022.
HollingsheadAB. Four Factor Index of Social Status. Yale University; 1975.
58.
Wong RiffKWYTsangarisEGoodacreTForrestCRPusicALCanoSJKlassenAF. International multiphase mixed methods study protocol to develop a cross cultural patient-reported outcome instrument for children and young adults with cleft and/or palate (CLEFT-Q). BMJ Open. 2017;7:e015467.
59.
KlassenAFRiffKWWLongmireNMAlbertAAllenGCAydinMABakerSBCanoSJChanAJCourtemancheDJ, et al.Psychometric findings and normative values for the cleft-q based on 2434 children and young adult patients with cleft lip and/or palate from 12 countries. CMAJ. 2018;190(15):E455–E462. doi:https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.170289.
60.
VarniJWSeidMKurtinPS. Pedsql 4.0: Reliability and validity of the pediatric quality of life inventory version 4.0 generic core scales in healthy and patient populations. Med Care. 2001;39(8):800–812. doi:10.1097/00005650-200108000-00006
61.
VarniJWShermanSABurwinkleTMDickinsonPEDixonP. The PedsQL family impact module: Preliminary reliability and validity. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004;2(Sept):55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-2-55.
62.
VarniJWBurwinkleTMSeidMSkarrD. The PedsQL 4.0 as a pediatric population health measure: Feasibility, reliability, and validity. Ambul Pediatr. 2003;3(6):329–341. doi:10.1367/1539-4409(2003)003<0329:tpaapp>2.0.co;2
63.
MedranoGRBerlinKSHobart DaviesW. Utility of the PedsQL™ family impact module: Assessing the psychometric properties in a community sample. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(10):2899–2907. doi:10.1007/s11136-013-0422-9
64.
IBM SPSS statistics. Version 30.0.0.0 IMB Corp; 2024.
65.
CrerandCEConradALBellucciCCAlbertMHeppnerCESheikhFWoodardSUdaipuriaSKapp-SimonKA. Psychosocial outcomes in children with cleft lip and/or palate: Associations of demographic, cleft morphologic, and treatment-related variables. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2024;61(11):1784–1802. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656231181581.
CohenJ. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers; 1988.
68.
HanssonESvenssonHBeckerM. Adopted children with cleft lip or palate, or both, require special needs cleft surgery. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2012;46(2):75–79. doi:10.3109/2000656X.2012.668774
69.
WerkerCLde WildeHMink van der MolenABBreugemCC. Internationally adopted children with cleft lip and/or palate: A retrospective cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70(12):1732–1737. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2017.04.011
70.
KayeACheCChewWLStueveEAJiangS. Cleft care of internationally adopted children from China. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2019;56(1):46–55. doi:10.1177/1055665618771423
71.
PanepintoJ. A.HoffmannR. G.PajewskiN. M. A psychometric evaluation of the PedsQL Family Impact Module in parents of children with sickle cell disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009;7:32. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-7-32.
72.
AgnewCMFoster PageLHibbertS. Validity and reliability of the COHIP-SF in Australian children with orofacial cleft. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2017;27(6):574–582. doi:10.1111/ipd.12329
73.
KonanPManosudprasitMPisekPPisekAWangsrimongkolT. Oral health-related quality of life in children and young adolescent orthodontic cleft patients. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015;98(Suppl 7):S84–S91.
74.
LinJFangXHaPFuMWangH. Oral health-related quality of life in Chinese children with orofacial cleft. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2020;57(8):931–937. doi:10.1177/1055665620908426
75.
AliMANasirAFAbassSK. Oral health-related quality of life among Sudanese children treated for cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2021;58(11):1405–1411. doi:10.1177/1055665620987694
76.
BroderHLWilson-GendersonMSischoL. Oral health-related quality of life in youth receiving cleft-related surgery: Self-report and proxy ratings. Qual Life Res. 2017;26(4):859–867. doi:10.1007/s11136-016-1420-5
77.
MichelGBiseggerCFuhrDCAbelT; KIDSCREEN group. Age and gender differences in health-related quality of life of children and adolescents in Europe: A multilevel analysis. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(9):1147–1157. doi:10.1007/s11136-009-9538-3
78.
WangJJinWShiLGengYZhuXHuW.Health-related quality of life in children: The roles of age, gender and interpersonal trust. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(22):15408. Published 2022 Nov 21. doi:10.3390/ijerph192215408
79.
CrerandCERumseyNKazakAClarkeARauschJSarwerDB. Sex differences in perceived stigmatization, body image disturbance, and satisfaction with facial appearance and speech among adolescents with craniofacial conditions. Body Image. 2020;32(Mar):190–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2020.01.005.
80.
FeragenKBBorgeAI. Peer harassment and satisfaction with appearance in children with and without a facial difference. Body Image. 2010;7:97–e105.
81.
PotemraHMKLinJBertrandAA, et al.Long-term effect of multiple operations on psychosocial function in teenage cleft lip and palate patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;146(1):61e–68e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000006905
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
