Has Teachers’ Participation in Decision Making Increased in China? Local Responses to the Implementation of Education Decentralization in Guangdong Province
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2006
Has Teachers’ Participation in Decision Making Increased in China? Local Responses to the Implementation of Education Decentralization in Guangdong Province
AppleM. W. (2000). Between neoliberalism and neoconservatism: Education and conservation in a global context. In BurbulesN. C., & TorresC. A. (Eds.), Globalization and education: Critical perspectives (pp. 57–78). London: Falmer.
2.
AppleM. W. (2004). Creating difference: Neo-liberalism, neo-conservatism and the politics of educational reform.Journal of Educational Policy, 18(1), 12–44.
3.
BaileyB. (2000). The impact of mandated change. In BasciaN., & HargreavesA. (Eds.), The sharpe edge of educational change: Teaching, leading, and the realities of reform (pp. 112–128). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
4.
BallS. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach.Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
5.
BallS. J. (1998). Performativity and fragmentation in postmodern schooling. In CarterJ. (Ed.), Postmodernity and the fragmentation of welfare (pp. 187–203). London: Routledge.
6.
BoglerR., & SomechA. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teachers’ organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools.Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(3), 277–289.
7.
BrayM. (2003). Control of education: Issues and tensions in centralization and decentralization. In ArnoveR. F., & TorresC. A. (Eds.), Comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local (pp. 204–228). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
8.
BriggsK. L., & WohlstetterP. (2003). Key elements of a successful school-based management strategy.School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 14(3), 351–372.
9.
BrowderL. H. (1994). Exploring the meanings of teacher empowerment.International Journal of Educational Reform, 3(2), 137–153.
10.
BulkleyK. E. (2002). Recentralizing decentralization? Educational management organizations and charter schools’ educational programs (Occasional Paper No. 60). New York: Columbia University. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED477185)
11.
Carnegie Forum on Education and Economy. (1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 21st century.Washington, DC: Carnegie Task Force on Teaching as a Profession.
12.
Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party. (1985). Zhonggong zhongyang guanyu jiaoyu tizhi gaige de jueding [Decisions on the reform of the educational system]. Beijing, China: Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party.
13.
ChanD. K. K. (2003). Education reform policy of “one country, two systems”: A comparison of mainland China and Hong Kong.World Studies in Education, 4(1), 79–101.
14.
ConleyS. (1991). Review of research on teacher participation in school decision making.Review of Research in Education, 17, 225–266.
15.
ConleyS., SchmidleT., & SheddJ. B. (1988). Teacher participation in the management of school systems.Teachers College Record, 90(2), 260–280.
16.
CooperB. S., EhrensalP. A. L., & BrommeM. (2005). School-level politics and professional development: Traps in evaluating the quality of practicing teachers.Journal of Educational Policy, 19(1), 112–125.
Darling-HammondL., & WiseA. E. (1992). Teacher professionalism. In AlkinM. C. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational research (pp. 1359–1366). New York: Macmillan.
19.
DatnowA. (1994, April). Charter schools: Teachers professionalism and decentralization. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED384116)
20.
DatnowA. (2000). Power and politics in the adoption of school reform models.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(4), 357–374.
21.
DatnowA., & CastellanoM. (2000). Teachers’ responses to success for all? How beliefs, experiences, and adaptations shape implementation.American Educational Research Journal, 37(3), 775–799.
22.
DesimoneL. (2002). How can comprehensive school reform models be successfully implemented?Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 433–479.
23.
EirA. E. (2003). Quasi-market: The changing context of schooling.International Journal of Educational Reform, 12(1), 26–39.
24.
FirestoneW. A. (1977). Participation and influence in the planning of educational change.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 13(2), 167–191.
25.
FirestoneW. A. (1990). The commitment of teachers: Implications for policy, administration, and research.Advances in Research and Theories of School Management and Educational Policy, 1, 151–183.
26.
FullanM., & HargreavesA. (1991). What's worth fighting for: Working together for your school: Strategies for developing interactive professionalism in your school.Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia: Australian Council of Educational Administration.
27.
GaylesJ. (2004). Ignored expertise: Teacher response to school reform at a “D” school.International Journal of Educational Reform, 13(3), 164–180.
28.
GraceG. (1997). Politics, markets, and democratic schools: On the transformation of school leadership. In HalseyA. H., LaunderH., BrownP., & WellsA. S. (Eds.), Education: Culture, economy, and society (pp. 311–319). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
29.
HalaszG. (1993). The policy of school autonomy and the reform of educational administration: Hungarian changes in East European perspectives.International Review of Education, 9(6), 489–497.
30.
HalseyA. H., LauderH., BrownP., & WellsA. S. (1997). Education: Culture, economy and society.Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
31.
HansonE. M. (1997). Strategies of educational decentralization: Key questions and core issues.Journal of Educational Administration, 36(2), 111–128.
32.
HargreavesA., & FullanM. G. (Eds.). (1992). Understanding teacher development.New York: Teachers College Press.
33.
HawkinsJ. N. (2000). Centralization, decentralization, recentralization: Educational reform in China.Journal of Educational Administration, 38(5), 443–455.
34.
HellerG. S. (1993). Teacher empowerment—Sharing the challenge: A guide to implementation and success.NASSP Bulletin, 1(2), 94–103.
35.
HelsbyG. (1999). Changing teachers’ work: The reform of secondary schooling.Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
36.
HessF. M., MarantoR., & MillimanS. (2000, April). Can markets set bureaucrats free? The effects of school choice on teacher empowerment in the public schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED444251)
37.
Holmes Group. (1986). Tomorrow's teachers: A report of the Holmes Group.East Lansing, MI: Holmes Group.
38.
HoyW. K., & MiskelC. G. (2001). Educational administration: Theory, research and practice.Boston: McGraw-Hill.
39.
ImberM., & DukeD. (1984). Teacher participation in school decision making: A framework for research.Journal of Education Administration, 22(1), 24–45.
40.
IngersollR. M. (2003). Who controls teachers’ work? Power and accountability in America's schools.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
JohnsonS. M. (1990a). Redesigning teachers’ work. In ElmoreR. F. (Ed.), Restructuring schools: The next generation of educational reform (pp. 125–151). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42.
JohnsonS. M. (1990b). Teachers, power and school change. In CluneW. H., & WitteJ. F. (Eds.), Choice and control in American education: Vol. 2. The practice of choice, decentralization and school restructuring (pp. 343–357). London: Falmer.
43.
KarlsenG. E. (2000). Decentralized centralism? Framework for a better understanding of governance in the field of education.Journal of Education Policy, 15(5), 525–538.
44.
KeithN. Z. (1996). A critical perspective on teacher participation in urban schools.Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(1), 45–79.
45.
KleckerB., & LoadmanW. E. (1996, October). Exploring the relationship between teacher empowerment and teacher job satisfaction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Chicago. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED400254)
46.
LeithwoodK., & MenziesT. (1998). Forms and effects of school-based management: A review.Journal of Educational Policy, 12(3), 325–346.
47.
LiaoY. C., & PengS. L. (Eds.). (1996). Xiao zhang shou ce [Handbook for principals]. Beijing, China: Hong Qi.
48.
LittleJ. W. (1993). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 129–151.
49.
LittleJ. W. (2001). Professional development in pursuit of school reform. In LiebermanA., & MillerL. (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters (pp. 23–44). New York: Teachers College.
50.
LoL. N. K. (1999). Teacher development and teacher education in Hong Kong and the Chinese mainland. Paper presented at the International Conference on New Professionalism in Teaching, Hong Kong, China, January 1999.
51.
LoVetteO., WattsS., & HoodJ. (2000, November). An investigation of teachers’ perceptions of their principals’ “delegation” and “relationships” behavior. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Bowling Green, KY. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED450077)
52.
LundgrenU. P., & MattssonK. (1996). Decentralization by or for school improvement. In ChapmanJ. D., BoydW. L., LaunderR., & ReynoldsD. (Eds.), The reconstruction of education: Quality, equality, and control (pp. 139–148). London: Cassell.
53.
MakG. C. L., & LoL. N. K. (1996). Education. In YeungY. M., & SungY. W. (Eds.), Shanghai: Transformation and modernization under China's open policy (pp. 375–398). Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
54.
McDonnellL. M. (1989). The dilemma of teacher policy.Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
55.
MertensS., & YargerS. J. (1988). Teaching as a profession: Leadership, empowerment, and involvement.Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 32–37.
56.
MokK. H. (2000). Social and political development in post-reform China.London: Macmillan Press.
57.
MokK. H. (Ed.). (2003). Centralization and decentralization: Educational reforms and changing governance in Chinese society.Hong Kong, China: Comparative Education Research Centre of the University of Hong Kong and Kluwer Academic Publishers.
58.
National People's Congress of the Chinese Government. (1993). Zhonghua renmin guongheguo jiaoshifa [Teacher laws in China].
59.
OzgaJ. T. (1995). Deskilling a profession: Professionalism, deprofessionalization, and the new managerialism. In BusherH., & SaranR. (Eds.), Managing teachers as professionals in schools (pp. 21–37). London: Kogan Page.
60.
PoppletonP. (2000, April). Receptiveness and resistance to educational change. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED441794)
61.
PoppletonP., GershunskyB., & PullinR. (1994). Changes in administrative control and teacher satisfaction in England and the U.S.S.R.Comparative Education Review, 38(3), 323–346.
62.
RadnofskyM. L. (1994). Empowerment and the power not to change: Teachers’ perceptions of restructuring.International Journal of Educational Reform, 3(2), 154–164.
63.
SackneyL. E., & DibskiD. J. (1995). School-based management: Will it fly? In WongK. C., & ChengK. M. (Eds.), Educational leadership and change: An international perspective (pp. 29–42). Hong Kong, China: Hong Kong University Press.
64.
ShenJ. P. (1994). Educational policy in the People's Republic of China: A political influence perspective.Journal of Education Policy, 9(1), 1–13.
65.
ShenJ. P. (1998). Do teachers feel empowered?Educational Leadership, 55(7), 35–36.
66.
ShenS. S. (1996). Zhuanye zhuyi jiaoshiquanli yu jiaoyu xingzhengtizhi guanxi jiaoshiquanli xiaozhang de dongti yanjin [Relationships between professionalism, teachers’ power, and educational administration: A study of teachers’ power].Xin Zhu Shi Yuan Xue Bao, 9, 103–128.
67.
SmylieM. A. (1992). Teacher participation in school decision making: Assessing willingness to participate.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(1), 53–67.
68.
SmythJ., DowA., HattamR., ReidA., & ShacklockG. (2000). Teachers’ work in a globalizing economy.London: Falmer.
69.
StraussA., & CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory and procedures and techniques.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
70.
SullivanK. (1994). The impact of educational reform on teachers’ professional ideologies.New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 29(1), 3–20.
71.
WalderA. G. (1983). Organized dependency and cultures of authority in Chinese industry.Journal of Asian Study, 43(1), 51–76.
72.
WalderA. G. (1986). Communist neo-traditionalism: Work and authority in Chinese industry.Berkeley: University of California Press.
73.
WalkerE. M. (2002). The politics of school-based management: Understanding the process of devolving authority in urban school districts.Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10(22), 1–16.
74.
WalkerP. A., & RoderL. (1993). Reflections on the practical and legal implications of school-based management and teacher empowerment.Journal of Law and Education, 22(2), 159–175.
75.
WallR., & RinehartJ. S. (1998). School-based decision making and the empowerment of secondary school teachers.Journal of School Leadership, 8(1), 49–64.
76.
WebbR., & AshtonP. T. (1987). Teacher motivation and the conditions of teaching: A call for ecological reform. In WalkerS., & BartonL. (Eds.), Changing policies, changing teachers: New directions for schooling (pp. 22–40). Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
77.
WeissC. H. (1993). Shared decision making about what? A comparison of schools with and without teacher participation.Teachers College Record, 95(1), 69–92.
78.
WhiteP. A. (1992). Teacher empowerment under “ideal” school-site autonomy.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(1), 68–82.
79.
WhittyG., PowerS., & HalpinD. (1998). Devolution and choice in education: The school, the state and the market.Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research Press.
80.
WongL. N. (2003). Changing roles and shifting authority of principals in China: A mixed role of manager and clan leader.Education and Society, 21(2), 37–54.