There are growing concerns among educators that the traditional teaching and learning method which is teacher-centered and places an emphasis on students’ inputs cannot adequately reflect what students actually learn. Outcomes-Based Education (OBE), with an attempt to measure the effectiveness of learning outcomes, has emerged as a response to the weaknesses of traditional teaching method. Since then, OBE has been adopted worldwide. Admittedly, OBE represents a significant advance in education reform. However, this paper argues that OBE should not be taken too far. Room should be made for non-measureable learning outcomes. This paper provides a subjectivist critique and identifies the limitations of OBE. Unlike positivist approach in OBE, this paper proposes “subjective understanding” as an alternative teaching and learning method. This subjectivist approach sheds new light on specific teaching and learning methods, such as assessment method, apprentice system, and school life. This paper concludes that educators should not neglect non-observable elements which can be tackled by the subjectivist approach.
AddlesonMark (1995). Equilibrium versus understanding: Towards the restoration of economics as social theory.London: Routledge.
2.
AjiboyeO. E. (2012). Social Phenomenology of Alfred Schutz and the Development of African Sociology.British Journal of Arts and Social Sciences,4(1), 12–25.
3.
BergerP., & LuckmannT. (1966). The social construction of reality.New York, NY: Anchor Books.
4.
BerlachR. G. (2004). “Outcomes-Based Education and the death of knowledge.” Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, The University of Melbourne: Victoria, November 28, 2004–December 2, 2004.
5.
BoereeC. G. (1991). Teaching for meaning.Journal of Professional Studies, 15.
6.
ChuSam, FongNatalie, & TanSi Ying (2010). “Applying outcomes-based teaching and learning framework in the BSc Information Management program in the Faculty of Education.” Paper delivered at the International Conference on Enhancing Learning Experiences in Higher Education, the University of Hong Kong.
7.
DashN. K. (2005). “Module: Selection of the Research Paradigm and Methodology.” Learning and Teaching Unit, Manchester Metropolitan University, June.
8.
DornanTim, ScherpbierAlbert, KingNigel, and BoshuizenHenny (2005). Clinical teachers and problem-based learning: A phenomenological study.Medical Education, 39, 163–170.
FarisR. (1998). “From Elitism to Inclusive Education: Development of Outcomes-Based Learning and Post-Secondary Credit Accumulation and Transfer Systems in England and Wales.”http://eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED449830.pdf. Retrieved on August 22, 2014.
11.
FriedmanMilton (1953). The methodology of positive economics. In Essays in Positive Economics (pp. 3–43). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
GeertzC. (Ed.). (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In The Interpretation of Cultures (pp. 3–30). New York, NY: Basic Books.
13.
GoffmanErving (1969). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, London: Allen Lane.
14.
HartelR. W.,& GardnerD. (2003). Making the transition to a food science curriculum based on assessment of learning outcomes.Journal of Food Science Education,2(2), 32–39.
15.
HultgrenF. H. (1995). The phenomenology of “doing” phenomenology: The experience of teaching and learning together.Human Studies: A Journal for Philosophy and the Social Sciences, 18, 371–388.
16.
HultgrenF. H. (2000). “A non-traditional theoretical framework for home economics education.” Symposium discussant at the American Education Research Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, April.
17.
HultgrenF. H. (2001). “Exploring professional development: Understanding the lived time and place of teachers.” Symposium presentation at the Society for Phenomenology and the Human Sciences Annual Meeting, Baltimore, MD, October.
KumarL. R., ShenoyJ.,& VoraluK. (2012). Experiential learning: An interpretative phenomenological analysis.British Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science,2(4), 402–418.
20.
LachmannL. M. (1971). The Legacy of Max Weber.Berkeley: The Glendessary Press.
21.
LeeH. (2003). Outcomes-based education and the cult of educational efficiency: Using curriculum and assessment reforms to drive educational policy and practice.Education Research and Perspectives,30(2), 60–107.
22.
LevisonArnold B. (1974). Knowledge and society: An introduction to the philosophy of the social sciences.Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Co.
23.
McDanielE. A., FelderB. D., GordonL., HrutkaM. E., & QuinnS. (2000). New faculty roles in learning outcomes education: The experiences of four models and institutions.Innovative Higher Education,25(2), 143–157.
24.
NeumanW. L. (2000). Social research methods, 4th edition.Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
25.
OrlikowskiW., & BaroudiJ. (1991). Studying information technology in organizations: Research approaches and assumptions.Information Systems Research, 2, 1–28.
26.
RogersE. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations, 3rd edition, New York, NY: The Free Press.
27.
SchutzA. (1953). Common-sense and scientific interpretation of human action.Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, XIV (1/September), 1–38.
28.
SchutzA. (1962). Collected papers I: The problem of social reality.Maurice Natanson (Ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
29.
SchutzA. (1964). Collected papers II: Studies in social theory.Arvid Brodersen (Ed.). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
30.
SchutzA. (1967). The Phenomenology and Social World.Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
31.
SchutzA. (1970). On phenomenology and social relations.Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
32.
SchutzA., & LuckmannT. (1989). The structures of the life world.Evanston: Northwestern University Press, Volume II.
33.
ShandAlexander H. (1984). The capitalist alternative: An introduction to neo-Austrian economics.New York, NY: New York University Press.
34.
SpadyW. G. (Ed.). (1994). What does outcome-based education really mean? In Outcomes-based education: Critical issues and answers.Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators, Chapter 1.
35.
ThompsonM. G. (2005). Phenomenology of intersubjectivity: A historical overview of the concept and its clinical implications. In MillsJ. (Ed.), Relational and intersubjective perspectives in psychoanalysis: A critique (pp. 35–70). Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.
36.
WalshamG. (1993). Interpreting information systems in organizations.Chichester, NH: Wiley.
37.
WeberMax (1947/1964). The theory of social and economic organization, edited with an introduction by Talcott Parsons. New York, NY: Free Press.
38.
WeberMax (1991). The nature of social action. In RuncimanW. G. (Ed.), Weber: Selections in translation.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
WeickK. (1969). The social psychology of organizing.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
40.
WeickK. (1995). Sensemaking in organisations.Thousand Oaks: Sage.
41.
WeigertAndrew J. (1981). Sociology of everyday life.New York, NY: Longman.
42.
WernerMarta L. (2008/2009). “Helen Keller and Anne Sullivan: Writing Otherwise.”Interval(le)s, II.2–III.1; 4/5 (September): 958–996.
43.
WestonDeborah (2013/2014). A positive constructivist: An internal debate on opposing educational philosophies.Teaching & Learning,8(1), 1–19.
44.
WilsonT. D. (2002). “Alfred Schutz, phenomenology and research methodology for information behaviour research.” A paper delivered at the Fourth International Conference on Information Seeking in Context, Universidade Lusiada, Lisbon, Portugal, September 11–13, 2002.
