Masonry arch bridges, which were generally built using brick and stone materials, still form a significant part of the highway and railway networks in the World. The subsoil deformability may considerably affect seismic damage mechanics of masonry arch bridges. The paper investigates the effects of nonlinear foundation soil behavior on the seismic damage mechanisms of brick and stone semicircular masonry arch bridges. Direct soil-structure interaction (SSI) approach is taken into account in the 3 D finite element models of the masonry arch bridge-foundation-soil interaction systems including contact, finite and infinite elements. Nonlinear behaviors of masonry units and homogenous soil domain are modeled using the Concrete Damage Plasticity (CDP) and Mohr-Coulomb failure criteria. The selected ground motion is matched and deconvoluted for hard and medium soil domains. Seismic damage mechanisms of brick and stone masonry arch bridges subjected to combined longitudinal and vertical deconvolved ground motion components are obtained for hard, medium, and partially hard and medium soil domains and are compared with each other.
Abaqus v13 (2010) Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp., Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
2.
AcikgozSDeJongMJKechavarziC, et al. (2018a)
Dynamic response of a damaged masonry rail viaduct: Measurement and interpretation. Engineering Structures168: 544–558.
3.
AcikgozSDeJongMJSogaK (2018b)
Sensing dynamic displacements in masonry rail bridges using 2D digital image correlation. Structural Control and Health Monitoring25(8): e2187.
4.
AlecciVFocacciFRoveroL, et al. (2016a)
Extrados strengthening of brick masonry arches with PBO–FRCM composites: Experimental and analytical investigations. Composite Structures149: 184–196.
5.
AlecciVFocacciFRoveroL, et al. (2017)
Intrados strengthening of brick masonry arches with different FRCM composites: Experimental and analytical investigations. Composite Structures176: 898–909.
6.
AlecciVMisseriGRoveroL, et al. (2016b)
Experimental investigation on masonry arches strengthened with PBO-FRCM composite. Composites Part B: Engineering100: 228–239.
7.
AltunişikACBayraktarAGencAF (2015)
Determination of the restoration effect on the structural behavior of masonry arch bridges. Smart Structures and Systems16(1): 101–139.
8.
AltunişikACBayraktarASevimB, et al. (2011)
Vibration-based operational modal analysis of the Mikron historic arch bridge after restoration. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems28(3): 247–259.
9.
AtaeiSMiriAJahangiriM (2017)
Assessment of load carrying capacity enhancement of an open spandrel masonry arch bridge by dynamic load testing. International Journal of Architectural Heritage11(8): 1086–1100.
10.
AydinACÖzkayaSG (2018)
The finite element analysis of collapse loads of single-spanned historic masonry arch bridges (Ordu, Sarpdere Bridge). Engineering Failure Analysis84: 131–138.
11.
AytulunESoyozSKarciogluE (2019) System identification and seismic performance assessment of a stone arch bridge. Journal of Earthquake Engineering: 1–21, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1692740.
12.
BasilioIFedeleRLourençoP, et al. (2015)
Numerical and experimental analysis of full scale arches reinforced with GFRP materials. Key Engineering Materials624: 502–509.
13.
BatiSBRoveroL (2008)
Towards a methodology for estimating strength and collapse mechanism in masonry arches strengthened with fibre reinforced polymer applied on external surfaces. Materials and Structures/Materiaux et Constructions41(7): 1291–1306.
14.
BayraktarAAltunişikACBirinciF, et al. (2010)
Finite-element analysis and vibration testing of a two-span masonry arch bridge. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities24(1): 46–52.
15.
BayraktarABirinciFAltunışıkAC, et al. (2009)
Finite element model updating of Senyuva historical arch bridge using ambient vibration tests. TheBaltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering4(4): 177–185.
16.
BayraktarAHançerEAkköseM (2005)
Influence of base-rock characteristics on the stochastic dynamic response of dam–reservoir–foundation systems. Engineering Structures27(10): 1498–1508.
17.
BayraktarAHökelekliE (2020) Seismic performances of different spandrel wall strengthening techniques in masonry arch bridges. International Journal of Architectural Heritage.
18.
BayraktarAHökelekliEHalifeoğluM, et al. (2020)
Out-of-plane seismic failure assessment of spandrel walls in long-span masonry stone arch bridges using cohesive interfaces. Earthquakes and Structures18(1): 83–96.
19.
BayraktarATürkerTAltunişikAC (2015)
Experimental frequencies and damping ratios for historical masonry arch bridges. Construction and Building Materials75: 234–241.
20.
BehnamfarFAfshariM (2013)
Collapse analysis and strengthening of stone arch bridges against earthquake. International Journal of Architectural Heritage7(1): 1–25.
21.
BergamoORussoGDonadelloS (2014)
Retrofitting of the historic Castagnara bridge in Padua, Italy, with fibre reinforced plastic elements. Structural Engineering International: Journal of the International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering (IABSE)24(4): 532–543.
22.
BergamoOCampioneGDonadelloS, et al. (2015)
In-situ NDT testing procedure as an integral part of failure analysis of historical masonry arch bridges. Engineering Failure Analysis57: 31–55.
23.
BertolesiECarozziFGMilaniG, et al. (2017)
In situ-tests and advanced numerical modelling for masonry arches retrofitted with steel reinforced grout. Key Engineering Materials747: 242–249.
24.
BoothbyTE (2001)
Analysis of masonry arches and vaults. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials3(3): 246–256.
25.
BoothbyTE (2020)
Empirical design of masonry arch bridges. Journal of Architectural Engineering26(1): 02519002.
26.
BoothbyTENelsonSEScolforoML (1994) A visual classification system for masonry arch failures. In: 10th international brick and block masonry conference, Calgary, Canada, 5–7 July 1994, pp.349–358. The University of Calgary.
27.
BorriACasadeiPCastoriG, et al. (2009)
Strengthening of brick masonry arches with externally bonded steel reinforced composites. Journal of Composites for Construction13(6): 468–475.
28.
BorriACastoriGCorradiM (2011)
Intrados strengthening of brick masonry arches with composite materials. Composites Part B: Engineering42(5): 1164–1172.
29.
BoscatoGCinAD (2017)
Experimental and numerical evaluation of structural dynamic behavior of rialto bridge in Venice. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring7(4): 557–572.
30.
CaporaleALucianoR (2012)
Limit analysis of masonry arches with finite compressive strength and externally bonded reinforcement. Composites Part B: Engineering43(8): 3131–3145.
31.
CaporaleAFeoLLucianoR (2012)
Limit analysis of FRP strengthened masonry arches via nonlinear and linear programming. Composites Part B: Engineering43(2): 439–446.
32.
CarozziFGPoggiCBertolesiE, et al. (2018)
Ancient masonry arches and vaults strengthened with TRM, SRG and FRP composites: Experimental evaluation. Composite Structures187: 466–480.
33.
CavalagliNGusellaVSeveriniL (2016)
Lateral loads carrying capacity and minimum thickness of circular and pointed masonry arches. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences115-116: 645–656.
34.
CavicchiAGambarottaL (2005)
Collapse analysis of masonry bridges taking into account arch-fill interaction. Engineering Structures27(4): 605–615.
35.
CavicchiAGambarottaL (2007)
Lower bound limit analysis of masonry bridges including arch-fill interaction. Engineering Structures29(11): 3002–3014.
36.
ChenJF (2002)
Load-bearing capacity of masonry arch bridges strengthened with fibre reinforced polymer composites. Advances in Structural Engineering5(1): 37–44.
37.
ChiozziAMilaniGGrillandaN, et al. (2017)
Fast and reliable limit analysis approach for the structural assessment of FRP-reinforced masonry arches. Key Engineering Materials747: 196–203.
38.
CocciaSdi CarloFRinaldiZ (2015)
Collapse displacements for a mechanism of spreading-induced supports in a masonry arch. International Journal of Advanced Structural Engineering (IJASE)7(3): 307–320.
39.
CockingSAcikgozSDeJongM (2020)
Interpretation of the dynamic response of a masonry arch rail viaduct using finite-element modeling. Journal of Architectural Engineering26(1): 05019008.
40.
CondeBRamosLFOliveiraDV, et al. (2017)
Structural assessment of masonry arch bridges by combination of non-destructive testing techniques and three-dimensional numerical modelling: Application to Vilanova bridge. Engineering Structures148: 621–638.
41.
CostaCArêdeAMoraisM, et al. (2015)
Detailed FE and DE modelling of stone masonry arch bridges for the assessment of load-carrying capacity. Procedia Engineering114: 854–861.
42.
CostaCRibeiroDJorgeP, et al. (2016)
Calibration of the numerical model of a stone masonry railway bridge based on experimentally identified modal parameters. Engineering Structures123: 354–371.
D’AmbrisiAFocacciFCaporaleA (2013b)
Strengthening of masonry-unreinforced concrete railway bridges with PBO-FRCM materials. Composite Structures102: 193–204.
45.
D’AmbrisiAFocacciFLucianoR, et al. (2015)
Carbon-FRCM materials for structural upgrade of masonry arch road bridges. Composites Part B: Engineering75: 355–366.
46.
da PortoFTecchioGZampieriP, et al. (2016)
Simplified seismic assessment of railway masonry arch bridges by limit analysis. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering12(5): 567–591.
47.
DaryadelMCunninghamL (2016)
Optimisation of FRP strengthening systems for masonry arch bridges. Masonry International29(2): 61–72.
48.
DengLWangWYuY (2016)
State-of-the-art review on the causes and mechanisms of bridge collapse. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities30(2): 04015005. Article number
49.
DrosopoulosGAStavroulakisGEMassalasCV (2008)
Influence of the geometry and the abutments movement on the collapse of stone arch bridges. Construction and Building Materials22(3): 200–210.
50.
ElmalichDRabinovitchO (2009)
Masonry and monolithic circular arches strengthened with composite materials: A finite element model. Computers and Structures87(9–10): 521–533.
51.
ElmalichDRabinovitchO (2010)
Nonlinear analysis of masonry arches strengthened with composite materials. Journal of Engineering Mechanics136(8): 996–1005.
52.
ErdogmusEBoothbyT (2004)
Strength of spandrel walls in masonry arch bridges. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board1892(1): 47–55.
53.
FanningPBoothbyTERobertsBJ (2001)
Longitudinal and transverse effects in masonry arch assessment. Construction and Building Materials15(1): 51–60.
54.
FanningPJBoothbyTE (2001)
Three-dimensional modelling and full-scale testing of stone arch bridges. Computers and Structures79(29–30): 2645–2662.
55.
FoceF (2007)
Milankovitch’s Theorie der Druckkurven: Good mechanics for masonry architecture. Nexus Network Journal9(2): 185–210.
56.
FranckSABretschneiderNSlowikV (2020)
Safety analysis of existing masonry arch bridges by nonlinear finite element simulations. International Journal of Damage Mechanics29(1): 126–143.
57.
ForgácsTSarhosisVBagiK (2018)
Influence of construction method on the load bearing capacity of skew masonry arches. Engineering Structures168: 612–627.
58.
GalassiSMisseriGRoveroL, et al. (2018)
Failure modes prediction of masonry voussoir arches on moving supports. Engineering Structures173: 706–717.
59.
GarmendiaLMarcosIGarbinE, et al. (2014)
Strengthening of masonry arches with textile-reinforced mortar: Experimental behaviour and analytical approaches. Materials and Structures47(12): 2067–2080.
GulluHJafHS (2016)
Full 3D nonlinear time history analysis of dynamic soil–structure interaction for a historical masonry arch bridge. Environmental Earth Sciences75(21): 1421.
62.
HashashYMAMusgroveMIHarmonJA, et al. (2017) DEEPSOIL 6.1, User Manual,
Urbana, USA:
Board of Trustees of University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
63.
HeymanJ (1966)
The stone skeleton. International Journal of Solids and Structures2(2): 249–256.
64.
HeymanJ (1995) The Stone Skeleton: Structural Engineering of Masonry Architecture.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
65.
HökelekliEYilmazBN (2019)
Effect of cohesive contact of backfill with arch and spandrel walls of a historical masonry arch bridge on seismic response. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering63(3): 926–937.
66.
HousnerGW (1954)
Geotechnical problems of destructive earthquakes. Geotechnique4(4): 153–162.
67.
IslamiKTecchioGModenaC (2012)
Seismic intervention and dynamic testing of an arch bridge. Applied Mechanics and Materials 105–107: 1159–1164.
68.
JainAAcitoMChesiC, et al. (2019)
The seismic sequence of 2016–2017 in Central Italy: A numerical insight on the survival of the civic tower in Amatrice. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering18(4): 1371–1400.
69.
KaratonMAksoyHSSayınE, et al. (2017)
Nonlinear seismic performance of a 12th century historical masonry bridge under different earthquake levels. Engineering Failure Analysis79: 408–421.
LancioniGGentilucciDQuagliariniE, et al. (2016)
Seismic vulnerability of ancient stone arches by using a numerical model based on the non-smooth contact dynamics method. Engineering Structures119: 110–121.
72.
LeeJFenvesGL (1998)
Plastic-damage model for cyclic loading of concrete structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics124(8): 892–900.
73.
LegerPBoughoufalahM (1989)
Earthquake input mechanisms for time domain analysis of dam–foundation systems. Engineering Structures11(1): 37–46.
74.
LouMWangHChenX, et al. (2011)
Structure–soil–structure interaction: Literature review. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering31(12): 1724–1731.
75.
LooYCYangY (1991)
Cracking and failure analysis of masonry arch bridges. Journal of Structural Engineering117(6): 1641–1659.
76.
LublinerJOliverJOllerS, et al. (1989)
A plastic-damage model for concrete. International Journal of Solids and Structures25(3): 299–326.
77.
LubowieckaIAriasPRiveiroB, et al. (2011)
Multidisciplinary approach to the assessment of historic structures based on the case of a masonry bridge in Galicia (Spain). Computers and Structures89(17-18): 1615–1627.
78.
MahdikhaniMNaderiMZekavatiM (2016)
Finite element modeling of the influence of FRP techniques on the seismic behavior of historical arch stone bridge. Computers and Concrete18(1): 99–112. 112.
79.
MartinelliPGalliABarazzettiL, et al. (2018)
Bearing capacity assessment of a 14th century arch bridge in lecco (Italy). International Journal of Architectural Heritage12(2): 237–220.
80.
MasciottaM-GPellegriniDGirardiM, et al. (2020)
Dynamic characterization of progressively damaged segmental masonry arches with one settled support: Experimental and numerical analyses. Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale51: 423–441.
81.
MilaniGLourençoPL (2012)
3D non-linear behavior of masonry arch bridges. Computers and Structures110–111: 133–150.
82.
MilankovitchM (1904) Beitrag zur Theorie der Druckkurven. Dissertation zur Erlangung der Doktorwürde, K.K. technische Hochschule, Vienna.
83.
MisseriGRoveroLStipoG, et al. (2019)
Experimental and analytical investigations on sustainable and innovative strengthening systems for masonry arches. Composite Structures210: 526–537.
84.
MittalRKVutukuruKS (2017)
Analysis and retrofitting of arch bridges: A review. International Journal of Bridge Engineering (IJBE)5(2): 113–138.
85.
ModenaCTecchioGPellegrinoC, et al. (2015)
Reinforced concrete and masonry arch bridges in seismic areas: Typical deficiencies and retrofitting strategies. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering11(4): 415–442.
86.
MoreiraVNMatosJCOliveiraDV (2017)
Probabilistic-based assessment of a masonry arch bridge considering inferential procedures. Engineering Structures134: 61–73.
87.
MylonakisGGazetasG (2000)
Seismic soil-structure interaction: Beneficial or detrimental?Journal of Earthquake Engineering4(3): 277–301.
88.
NaderiMZekavatiM (2018)
Assessment of seismic behavior stone bridge using a finite element method and discrete element method. Earthquakes and Structures14(4): 297–303.
89.
NIST (2012) Soil-structure interaction for building structures. Report No. GCR 12-917-21, prepared by the NEHRP Consultants Joint Venture (a partnership of the Applied Technology Council and Consortium of Universities for Research in Earthquake Engineering) for the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Washington, D.C.
90.
OliveiraDVBasilioILourencoPB (2010)
Experimental behavior of FRP strengthened masonry arches. Journal of Composites for Construction14(3): 312–322.
91.
PageJ (1993) Masonry Arch Bridges.
London:
London Transport Research Laboratory, HMSO.
92.
PageJ (1995) Load tests to collapse on masonry arch bridges: Arch bridges. In: Proceedings of the first international conference on arch bridges, 3-5 September 1995, Bolton, UK.
93.
PantòBMalenaMDe FeliceG (2017)
Non-linear modeling of masonry arches strengthened with FRCM. Key Engineering Materials747: 93–100.
94.
PelàLAprileABenedettiA (2013)
Comparison of seismic assessment procedures for masonry arch bridges. Construction and Building Materials38: 381–394.
95.
PintucchiBZaniN (2016)
A simple model for performing nonlinear static and dynamic analyses of unreinforced and FRP-strengthened masonry arches. European Journal of Mechanics, A/Solids59: 210–231.
96.
PiroAde SilvaFParisiF, et al. (2019)
Effects of soil-foundation-structure interaction on fundamental frequency and radiation damping ratio of historical masonry building sub-structures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.
97.
PoulMKZervaA (2018)
Efficient time-domain deconvolution of seismic ground motions using the equivalent-linear method for soil-structure interaction analyses. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering112: 138–151.
98.
PoulMKZervaA (2019)
Comparative evaluation of foundation modeling for SSI analyses using two different ABC approaches: Applications to dams. Engineering Structures200: 109725.
99.
PulatsuBErdogmusELourençoPB (2019)
Comparison of in-plane and out-of-plane failure modes of masonry arch bridges using discontinuum analysis. Engineering Structures178: 24–36.
100.
RecciaEMilaniGCecchiA, et al. (2014)
Full 3D homogenization approach to investigate the behavior of masonry arch bridges: The Venice trans-lagoon railway bridge. Construction and Building Materials66: 567–586.
101.
RotaMPeckerABologniniD, et al. (2005)
A methodology for seismic vulnerability of masonry arch bridge walls. Journal of Earthquake Engineering9: 331–353.
102.
RoselliIMalenaMMongelliM, et al. (2018)
Health assessment and ambient vibration testing of the “ponte delle torri” of spoleto during the 2016–2017 Central Italy seismic sequence. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring8(2): 199–216.
103.
RovithisENPitilakisKD (2016)
Seismic assessment and retrofitting measures of a historic stone masonry bridge. Earthquake and Structures10(3): 645–667.
104.
Sanchez-AparicioLJDe CastroABCondeB, et al. (2019)
Non-destructive means and methods for structural diagnosis of masonry arch bridges. Automation in Construction104: 360–382.
105.
SarhosisVDe SantisSde FeliceG (2016)
A review of experimental investigations and assessment methods for masonry arch. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering12(11): 1439–1464.
106.
ScozzeseFRagniLTubaldiE, et al. (2019)
Modal properties variation and collapse assessment of masonry arch bridges under scour action. Engineering Structures199: 109665.
107.
SeveriniLCavalagliNDeJongM, et al. (2018)
Dynamic response of masonry arch with geometrical irregularities subjected to a pulse-type ground motion. Nonlinear Dynamics91(1): 609–624.
108.
SevimBAtamturkturSAltunişikAC, et al. (2016)
Ambient vibration testing and seismic behavior of historical arch bridges under near and far fault ground motions. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering14(1): 241–259.
109.
SevimBBayraktarAAltunişikAC, et al. (2011a)
Finite element model calibration effects on the earthquake response of masonry arch bridges. Finite Elements in Analysis and Design47(7): 621–634.
110.
SevimBBayraktarAAltunişikAC, et al. (2011b)
Assessment of nonlinear seismic performance of a restored historical arch bridge using ambient vibrations. Nonlinear Dynamics63(4): 755–770.
111.
SimosNManosGCKozikopoulosE (2018)
Near- and far-field earthquake damage study of the Konitsa stone arch bridge. Engineering Structures177: 256–267.
112.
SolarBNowroozpourAClopperP, et al. (2019) Scour-induced failure of masonry arch bridges: Causes and countermeasures. In: 38th IAHR world congress, Panama City, Panama, 1–6 September 2019.
113.
StavroulakiMERiveiroBDrosopoulosGA, et al. (2016)
Modelling and strength evaluation of masonry bridges using terrestrial photogrammetry and finite elements. Advances in Engineering Software101: 136–148.
114.
StockdaleGLSarhosisVMilaniG (2020)
Seismic capacity and multi‐mechanism analysis for dry‐stack masonry arches subjected to hinge control. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering18(2): 673–724.
115.
TaoYStratfordTJChenJF (2011)
Behaviour of a masonry arch bridge repaired using fibre-reinforced polymer composites. Engineering Structures33(5): 1594–1606.
116.
TBEC (2019) Turkish Building Earthquake Code.
Ankara, Turkey:
Disaster and Emergency Management Authority (in Turkish).
117.
TempestaGGalassiS (2019)
Safety evaluation of masonry arches: a numerical procedure based on the thrust line closest to the geometrical axis. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences155: 206–221.
118.
TibertiSAcitoMMilaniG (2016)
Comprehensive FE numerical insight into Finale Emilia Castle behavior under 2012 Emilia Romagna seismic sequence: Damage causes and seismic vulnerability mitigation hypothesis. Engineering Structures117: 397–421.
119.
TubaldiEMacoriniLIzzuddinBA (2020)
Identification of critical mechanical parameters for advanced analysis of masonry arch bridges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering16(2): 328–345.
ValenteMMilaniG (2016a)
Seismic assessment of historical masonry towers by means of simplified approaches and standard FEM. Constrction and Building Materials108: 74–104.
125.
ValenteMMilaniG (2016b)
Non-linear dynamic and static analyses on eight historical masonry towers in the North East of Italy. Engineering Structures114: 241–270.
126.
VeletsosASMeekJW (1974)
Dynamic behavior of building-foundation systems. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics3(2): 121–138.
WolfJP (1991) Classification of analysis methods for dynamic soil-structure interaction. In: International conferences on recent advances in geotechnical earthquake engineering and soil dynamics, p.4. University of Missouri-Rolla, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
129.
ZampieriPCavalagliNGusellaV, et al. (2018d)
Collapse displacements of masonry arch with geometrical uncertainties on spreading supports. Computers and Structures208: 118–129.
130.
ZampieriPFaleschiniFZaniniMA, et al. (2018c)
Collapse mechanisms of masonry arches with settled springing. Engineering Structures156: 363–374.
131.
ZampieriPSimoncelloNPellegrinoC (2018b)
Structural behaviour of masonry arch with no-horizontal springing settlement. Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale12(43): 182–190.
132.
ZampieriPSimoncelloNTetougueniCD, et al. (2018a)
A review of methods for strengthening of masonry arches with composite materials. Engineering Structures171: 154–169.
133.
ZampieriPTecchioGda PortoF, et al. (2015)
Limit analysis of transverse seismic capacity of multi-span masonry arch bridges. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering13(5): 1557–1579.
134.
ZampieriPZaniniMAFaleschiniF, et al. (2017)
Failure analysis of masonry arch bridges subject to local pier scour. Engineering Failure Analysis79: 371–384.
135.
ZaniGMartinelliPGalliA, et al. (2019)
Seismic assessment of a 14th-century stone arch bridge: Role of soil-structure interaction. Journal of Bridge Engineering24(7): 05019008.
136.
ZhangYMacoriniLIzzuddinBA (2018)
Numerical investigation of arches in brick-masonry bridges. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering14(1): 14–32.
137.
ZhaoZMChenFJChaiJY, et al. (2014)
Analysis and evaluation on strengthening and widening of a catenary stone arch bridge with solid spandrels. Advanced Materials Research838–841: 1042–1047.
138.
ZlámalMŠtěpánekP (2018)
Strengthening of arched masonry structures by additional reinforcement: Design approaches and comparison to experiments. Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering13(3): 313–330.
