This paper presents an experimental and numerical analysis of damage evolution in AA2011 aluminum alloy wires drawn under different scenarios. To this end, load-unload tensile tests were firstly carried out in order to characterize the degradation of the mechanical response in every cycle where the experimental results show a bilinear damage relationship in terms of the effective plastic strain. Therefore, a modification of the classical Lemaitre model is proposed in this work in order to reproduce bilinear paths of damage with the addition of only two parameters that can be directly obtained from the material characterization. Then, the damage predictive capability of this new experimental-based model is assessed in numerical simulations of the drawing process in one and two passes (considering for this last case the sequential and tandem configurations) where the computed predictions are compared with the corresponding experimental data showing a good agreement between them.
Andrade PiresFCesar de SaJCosta SousaL, et al. (2003)
Numerical modelling of ductile plastic damage in bulk metal forming. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences45(2): 273–294.
2.
BaekHMJinYGHwangSK, et al. (2012)
Numerical study on the evolution of surface defects in wire drawing. Journal of Materials Processing Technology212(4): 776–785.
3.
BonoraN (1997)
A nonlinear CDM model for ductile failure. Engineering Fracture Mechanics58(1–2): 11–28.
4.
BouchardP-OBourgeonLFayolleS, et al. (2011)
An enhanced Lemaitre model formulation for materials processing damage computation. International Journal of Material Forming4(3): 299–315.
5.
BrünigM (2003)
An anisotropic ductile damage model based on irreversible thermodynamics. International Journal of Plasticity19(10): 1679–1713.
6.
CamachoAMGonzálezCRubioEM, et al. (2006)
Influence of geometrical conditions on central burst appearance in axisymmetrical drawing processes. Journal of Materials Processing Technology177(1–3): 304–306.
7.
CaoT-SBobadillaCMontmitonnetP, et al. (2015)
A comparative study of three ductile damage approaches for fracture prediction in cold forming. Journal of Materials Processing Technology216: 385–404.
8.
CaoT-SGachetJ-MMontmitonnetP, et al. (2014)
A lode-dependent enhanced Lemaitre model for ductile fracture prediction at low stress triaxiality. Engineering Fracture Mechanics124–125: 80–96.
9.
CelentanoDChabocheJ-L (2007)
Experimental and numerical characterization of damage evolution in steels. International Journal of Plasticity23(10–11): 1739–1762.
10.
ChandrakanthSPandeyPC (1995)
An isotropic damage model for ductile material. Engineering Fracture Mechanics50(4): 457–465.
11.
ChowCLWangJ (1987)
An anisotropic theory of continuum damage mechanics for ductile fracture. Engineering Fracture Mechanics27(5): 547–558.
12.
DharSSethuramanRDixitPM (1996)
A continuum damage mechanics model for void growth and micro crack initiation. Engineering Fracture Mechanics53(6): 917–928.
13.
GonzálezAACruchagaMACelentanoDJ (2018)
Incidence of die spacing in the evolution of damage in two-pass wire drawing processes. Engineering Fracture Mechanics200: 375–386.
14.
GursonAL (1977)
Continuum theory of ductile rupture by void nucleation and growth: part I – yield criteria and flow rules for porous ductile media. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology99(1): 2–15.
15.
KachanovL (1958)
Time of the rupture process under creep conditions. Izvestiia akademii nauk SSSR. Otdelenie Teckhnicheskikh Nauk8: 26–31.
16.
KoDKimB (2000)
The prediction of Central burst defects in extrusion and wire drawing. Journal of Materials Processing Technology102(1–3): 19–24.
17.
KumarMDixitPM (2015)
A nonlinear ductile damage growth law. International Journal of Damage Mechanics24(7): 1070–1085.
18.
Le RoyGEmburyJDEdwardsG, et al. (1981)
A model of ductile fracture based on the nucleation and growth of voids. Acta Metallurgica29(8): 1509–1522.
19.
LemaitreJ (1985)
A continuous damage mechanics model for ductile fracture. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology107(1): 83–89.
20.
McAllenPPhelanP (2007)
Numerical analysis of axisymmetric wire drawing by means of a coupled damage model. Journal of Materials Processing Technology183(2–3): 210–218.
21.
McClintockF (1968)
A criterion for ductile fracture by the growth of holes. Journal of Applied Mechanics35(2): 363–371.
22.
NavasVMBernackiMBouchardPO (2018)
Void growth and coalescence in a three-dimensional non-periodic void cluster. International Journal of Solids and Structures139–140: 65–78.
23.
OrbegozoJI (1968)
Fracture in wire drawing. Annals of the CIRP16: 319–330.
24.
PhelanPBrandonJHilleryM (2001a)
Numerical modelling of defect formation on copper wire surfaces during the wire drawing process. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science215(2): 237–246.
25.
PhelanPBrandonJHilleryM (2001b)
Central burst defect analysis of the wire-drawing process using an accumulated damage parameter. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science215(11): 1313–1319.
26.
RiceJRTraceyDM (1969)
On the ductile enlargement of voids in triaxial stress fields. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids17(3): 201–217.
27.
ShakoorMNavasVMPinoMD, et al. (2019)
Computational methods for ductile fracture modeling at the microscale. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering26(4): 1153–1192.
28.
TaiWHYangBX (1986)
A new microvoid damage model for ductile fracture. Engineering Fracture Mechanics25(3): 377–384.
29.
TvergaardVNeedlemanA (1984)
Analysis of the cup-cone fracture in a round tensile bar. Acta Metallurgica32(1): 157–169.
30.
Uribe-SuárezDBouchardP-ODelboM, et al. (2020)
Numerical modeling of crack propagation with dynamic insertion of cohesive elements. Engineering Fracture Mechanics227: 106918.
31.
WangT (1991)
A continuum damage model for ductile fracture of weld heat affected zone. Engineering Fracture Mechanics40(6): 1075–1082.
