U.S. Public Sector Supplier Diversity: An Intersectional Invisibility Perspective

Abstract

Motivated by a desire to understand who benefits from public-sector supplier diversity, and why, we conducted a comparative case study across six U.S. state-level supplier diversity programs. We collected/analyzed qualitative data via semi-structured interviews with high-level state leaders and collected spending data via 2017–2021 semiannual/annual reports. We found that businesses owned by White women benefit more from supplier diversity programs than those owned by ethnic minorities (Blacks, Hispanics, Indigenous, and Asians). Adopting an intersectional invisibility perspective, we conduct within- and cross-case analyses of the collected data, we highlight key themes and make several recommendations for how public-sector supplier diversity programs can systemically address disparities and improve their performance. We also offer recommendations for future research into this ecosystem.

Keywords

DEI intersectional identities public procurement public sector supplier diversity

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Billiondollarroundtable.org (BDR)

Adobor

McMullen

(2007) Supplier diversity and supply chain management: A strategic approach. Business Horizons 50(3): 219–229.

Baldus

Hatton

(2020) US Chief procurement officers’ perspectives on public procurement. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 26(1): 100538.

Blanchflower

Wainwright

(2005) An analysis of the impact of affirmative action programs on self-employment in the construction industry. Working paper no. 11793. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Blount

(2021) How buyers' attitudes toward supplier diversity affect their expenditures with ethnic minority businesses. Journal of Supply Chain Management 57(3): 3–24.

Blount

Smith

(2021) Managing diversity in minority business enterprises: the impact of employee homogeneity on financial performance. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion. An International Journal 40(7): 859–873.

Blount

Hill

(2015) Supplier diversification by executive order: Examining the effect reporting compliance, education and training, outreach, and proximity to leadership have on government procurement behavior with minority business enterprises. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 21(4): 251–258.

Blount

Seetharaman

Brown

(2018) The impact of strategy on public sector set-aside programs: the case of the state of Ohio. Journal of Public Procurement 18(1): 31–49.

Calvo

Cui

Serpa

(2019) Oversight and efficiency in public projects: A regression discontinuity analysis. Management Science 65(12): 5651–5675.

10.

Carter

Auskalnis

Ketchum

(1999) Purchasing from minority business enterprises: Key success factors. Journal of Supply Chain Management 35(4): 28–32.

11.

Chatterji

Chay

Fairlie

(2014) The impact of city contracting set-asides on black self-employment and employment. Journal of Labor Economics 32(3): 507–561.

12.

Coviello

Guglielmo

Spagnolo

(2018) The effect of discretion on procurement performance. Management Science 64(2): 715–738.

13.

Dollinger

Enz

Daily

(1991) Purchasing from minority small businesses. International Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 27(2): 9–14.

14.

Giunipero

(1980) Differences between minority and non-minority suppliers. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 16(1): 2–8.

15.

Lashley

Pollock

(2020) Dancing with giants: How small women-and minority-owned firms use soft power to manage asymmetric relationships with larger partners. Organization Science 31(6): 1313–1335.

16.

Lines

Kakarapalli

Nguyen

(2022) Does best value procurement cost more than low bid? A total project cost perspective. International Journal of Construction Education and Research 18(1): 85–100.

17.

Mazzarol

(2021) Future research opportunities: A systematic literature review and recommendations for further research into minority entrepreneurship. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Minority Entrepreneurship, 503–561.

18.

Myers

SL Jr

Chan

(1996) Who benefits from minority business set-asides? The case of New Jersey. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 15(2): 202–226.

19.

New Jersey Disparity Study (2024) https://www.nj.gov/treasury/pdf/New%20Jersey%20Study%20on%20Disparity%20in%20State%20Procurement%20January%202024.pdf .

20.

Oregon Disparity Study (2023) https://www.oregon.gov/das/Docs/2023%20State%20of%20Oregon%20Disparity%20Study%20Final%20Report_November%2016%202023.pdf .

21.

Purdie-Vaughns

Eibach

(2008) Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles 59(5): 377–391.

22.

Ram

Smallbone

(2003) Policies to support ethnic minority enterprise: The English experience. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 15(2): 151–166.

23.

Rice

(1992) Justifying state and local government set-aside programs through disparity studies in the post-croson era. Public Administration Review 52(5): 482–490.

24.

Shah

Ram

(2006) Supplier diversity and minority business enterprise development: case study experience of three US multinationals. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal 11(1): 75–81.

25.

Sordi

Tate

Huang

(2022) Going beyond supplier diversity to economic inclusion: Where are we now and where do we go from here? Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 28(2): 100751.

26.

Vairavan

(2021) Growing The Pie: How Supplier Diversity Can Enable Minority Businesses to Create Stakeholder Value. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2021/12/02/fact-sheet-biden-harris-administration-announces-reforms-to-increase-equity-and-level-the-playing-field-for-underserved-small-business-owners/.

27.

Worthington

Ram

Boyal

, et al. (2008) Researching the drivers of socially responsible purchasing: A cross-national study of supplier diversity initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics 79(3): 319–331.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.31 MB