Bridging the Divide? The Differential Impact of Health Information Exchange (HIE) on Healthcare Professionals’ Productivity in Urban and Rural Settings
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026
Bridging the Divide? The Differential Impact of Health Information Exchange (HIE) on Healthcare Professionals’ Productivity in Urban and Rural Settings
Health information exchanges (HIEs) facilitate the secure, electronic sharing of patient medical records across providers, enabling healthcare professionals to access timely, comprehensive data and thereby improve care coordination and quality. Yet, despite these expected benefits, empirical evidence shows that healthcare professionals often spend substantial time and effort interacting with HIE platforms without discernible productivity gains. Moreover, although HIEs are promoted as a potential solution for addressing geospatial disparities in healthcare, their impact on healthcare professionals’ productivity across urban and rural hospitals remains unclear. Using data envelopment analysis (DEA) to construct a measure of healthcare professionals’ productivity and applying a difference-in-differences (DiD) approach, we investigate the impact of HIE adoption on healthcare professionals’ productivity in urban and rural hospitals in the United States. Our findings show that hospitals that have adopted an HIE experience a significant increase in healthcare professionals’ productivity. However, this effect is more pronounced in urban hospitals than in rural hospitals. We attribute this result to urban hospitals having more information-intensive workflows and greater technological sophistication than rural hospitals. Furthermore, our study reveals that HIE adoption improves communication and the quality of clinical decision-making among urban healthcare professionals, but not among those in rural hospitals. We also find that the productivity gains from HIE adoption are greater for nurses than for physicians. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings.
AdjeridIAcquistiATelangR, et al. (2016) The impact of privacy regulation and technology incentives: The case of health information exchanges. Management Science62(4): 1042–1063.
2.
AdjeridIAdler-MilsteinJAngstC (2018) Reducing Medicare spending through electronic health information exchange: The role of incentives and exchange maturity. Information Systems Research29(2): 341–361.
3.
Adler-MilsteinJJhaAK (2014) Health information exchange among US hospitals: Who's in, who's out, and why?Healthcare2(1): 26–32.
4.
Adler-MilsteinJJhaAK (2017) HITECH Act drove large gains in hospital electronic health record adoption. Health Affairs36(8): 1416–1422.
5.
Adler-MilsteinJLinSCJhaAK (2016) The number of health information exchange efforts is declining, leaving the viability of broad clinical data exchange uncertain. Health Affairs35(7): 1278–1285.
6.
AHA (2022) ONC finalizes principles, agreement for trusted health information exchange.
7.
AkshatSMaLRaghavanS (2023) Improving broader sharing to address geographic inequity in liver transplantation. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management25(4): 1509–1526.
8.
Al-AminMMakaremSCRoskoM (2016) Efficiency and hospital effectiveness in improving hospital consumer assessment of healthcare providers and systems ratings. Health Care Management Review41(4): 296–305.
9.
AngristJDPischkeJ-S (2009) Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.
AngstCMDevarajSQueenanCC, et al. (2011) Performance effects related to the sequence of integration of healthcare technologies. Production and Operations Management20(3): 319–333.
11.
AralSBrynjolfssonEVan AlstyneM (2012) Information, technology, and information worker productivity. Information Systems Research23(3-part-2): 849–867.
12.
AtasoyHChenP-yGanjuK (2018) The spillover effects of health IT investments on regional healthcare costs. Management Science64(6): 2515–2534.
13.
AtasoyHDemirezenEMChenPY (2021) Impacts of patient characteristics and care fragmentation on the value of HIEs. Production and Operations Management30(2): 563–583.
14.
AtasoyHGreenwoodBNMcCulloughJS (2019) The digitization of patient care: A review of the effects of electronic health records on health care quality and utilization. Annual Review of Public Health40: 487–500.
15.
AyabakanSBardhanIZhengZ, et al. (2017) The impact of health information sharing on duplicate testing. MIS Quarterly41(4): 1083–1104.
16.
AyerTAyvaciMUKaracaZ, et al. (2019) The impact of health information exchanges on emergency department length of stay. Production and Operations Management28(3): 740–758.
17.
AyvaciMCavusogluHKimY, et al. (2022) Designing payment contracts for healthcare services to induce information sharing: The adoption and the value of health information exchanges (HIEs). MIS Quarterly45(2): 637–692.
18.
BakerA (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. British Medical Journal323: 1192–1192.
19.
BankerRDCharnesACooperWW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science30(9): 1078–1092.
20.
BardhanIRBaoCAyabakanS (2023) Value implications of sourcing electronic health records: The role of physician practice integration. Information Systems Research34(3): 1169–1190.
21.
BaucumMHarrisMKesslerL, et al. (2025) Reducing overdose deaths and mitigating county disparities: Optimal allocation of substance use treatment centers. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management27(3): 736–756.
22.
BhargavaHKMishraAN (2014) Electronic medical records and physician productivity: Evidence from panel data analysis. Management Science60(10): 2543–2562.
23.
BlackDKolesnikovaNTaylorL (2009) Earnings functions when wages and prices vary by location. Journal of Labor Economics27(1): 21–47.
24.
BlumenthalDTavennerM (2010) The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. New England Journal of Medicine363(6): 501–504.
25.
BundersonJSBoumgardenP (2010) Structure and learning in self-managed teams: Why “bureaucratic” teams can be better learners. Organization Science21(3): 609–624.
26.
BurtchGCarnahanSGreenwoodBN (2018) Can you gig it? An empirical examination of the gig economy and entrepreneurial activity. Management Science64(12): 5497–5520.
27.
Burton-JonesAVolkoffO (2017) How can we develop contextualized theories of effective use? A demonstration in the context of community-care electronic health records. Information Systems Research28(3): 468–489.
28.
Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2020) About rural health.
29.
CharnesACooperWWRhodesE (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research2(6): 429–444.
30.
ClementJPValdmanisVGBazzoliGJ, et al. (2008) Is more better? An analysis of hospital outcomes and efficiency with a DEA model of output congestion. Health Care Management Science11: 67–77.
31.
CMS (2021) State Medicaid health information technology plan.
32.
CorbettCJNarayananSAloysiusJ, et al. (2025) Diversity, equity and inclusion and operations management: Critical linkages and research opportunities. Production and Operations Management34(3): 310–330.
33.
DemerjianPLevBMcVayS (2012) Quantifying managerial ability: A new measure and validity tests. Management Science58(7): 1229–1248.
34.
DemirezenEMKumarSSenA (2016) Sustainability of healthcare information exchanges: A game-theoretic approach. Information Systems Research27(2): 240–258.
35.
DevarajSOwTTKohliR (2013) Examining the impact of information technology and patient flow on healthcare performance: A theory of swift and even flow (TSEF) perspective. Journal of Operations Management31(4): 181–192.
36.
DeyASinhaKKThirumalaiS (2013) IT capability for health care delivery: Is more better?Journal of Service Research16(3): 326–340.
37.
DingWWLevinSGStephanPE, et al. (2010) The impact of information technology on academic scientists’ productivity and collaboration patterns. Management Science56(9): 1439–1461.
38.
DobrzykowskiDDTarafdarM (2015) Understanding information exchange in healthcare operations: Evidence from hospitals and patients. Journal of Operations Management36: 201–214.
39.
EdwardsAHollinIBarryJ, et al. (2010) Barriers to cross-institutional health information exchange: A literature review. Journal of Healthcare Information Management: JHIM24(3): 22–34.
40.
EftekhariSYaraghiNGopalRD, et al. (2023) Impact of health information exchange adoption on referral patterns. Management Science69(3): 1615–1638.
41.
EversonJButlerE (2020) Hospital adoption of multiple health information exchange approaches and information accessibility. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association27(4): 577–583.
42.
Federal Communications Commission (2015) Connecting America: The national broadband plan.
43.
FurukawaMFRaghuTShaoBB (2010) Electronic medical records and cost efficiency in hospital medical-surgical units. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing47(2): 110–123.
44.
Gal-OrEGhoseA (2005) The economic incentives for sharing security information. Information Systems Research16(2): 186–208.
45.
GaoJSarwarZ (2024) How do firms create business value and dynamic capabilities by leveraging big data analytics management capability?Information Technology and Management25(3): 283–304.
46.
GohJMGaoGAgarwalR (2011) Evolving work routines: Adaptive routinization of information technology in healthcare. Information Systems Research22(3): 565–585.
47.
GohJMGaoGAgarwalR (2016) The creation of social value: Can an online health community reduce rural–urban health disparities?MIS Quarterly40(1): 247–264.
48.
GottliebDJZhouWSongY, et al. (2010) Prices don’t drive regional Medicare spending variations. Health Affairs29(3): 537–543.
49.
GreenbergAJHaneyDBlakeKD, et al. (2018) Differences in access to and use of electronic personal health information between rural and urban residents in the United States. The Journal of Rural Health34: s30–s38.
50.
GreenwoodBNAgarwalR (2016) Matching platforms and HIV incidence: An empirical investigation of race, gender, and socioeconomic status. Management Science62(8): 2281–2303.
51.
GreenwoodBNWattalS (2017) Show me the way to go home: An empirical investigation of ride sharing and alcohol related motor vehicle homicide. MIS Quarterly41(1): 163–187.
52.
GrossmanJMBodenheimerTSMcKenzieK (2006) Hospital-physician portals: The role of competition in driving clinical data exchange. Health Affairs25(6): 1629–1636.
53.
HaasMRHansenMT (2007) Different knowledge, different benefits: Toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations. Strategic Management Journal28(11): 1133–1153.
54.
HasanMZDinsaGDBermanP (2021) A practical measure of health facility efficiency: An innovation in the application of routine health information to determine health worker productivity in Ethiopia. Human Resources for Health19: 1–14.
55.
HincapieALWarholakTLMurckoAC, et al. (2011) Physicians’ opinions of a health information exchange. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association18(1): 60–65.
56.
HungPHenning-SmithCECaseyMM, et al. (2017) Access to obstetric services in rural counties still declining, with 9 percent losing services, 2004–14. Health Affairs36(9): 1663–1671.
57.
HwangB-HLibertiJMSturgessJ (2019) Information sharing and spillovers: Evidence from financial analysts. Management Science65(8): 3624–3636.
58.
HwangEHGuoXTanY, et al. (2022) Delivering healthcare through teleconsultations: Implications for offline healthcare disparity. Information Systems Research33(2): 515–539.
59.
IsraelEFrenkelA (2018) Social justice and spatial inequality: Toward a conceptual framework. Progress in Human Geography42(5): 647–665.
60.
JacobJA (2015) On the road to interoperability, public and private organizations work to connect health care data. JAMA314(12): 1213–1215.
61.
JanakiramanRParkEMDemirezenE, et al. (2023) The effects of health information exchange access on healthcare quality and efficiency: An empirical investigation. Management Science69(2): 791–811.
62.
JaskiewiczWTulenkoK (2012) Increasing community health worker productivity and effectiveness: A review of the influence of the work environment. Human Resources for Health10: 1–9.
63.
JhaAKDesRochesCMCampbellEG, et al. (2009) Use of electronic health records in US hospitals. New England Journal of Medicine360(16): 1628–1638.
64.
JiangSHuMJinYJ, et al. (2025) Impact of technical support and information provision on patient no-show behavior. Production and Operations Management34(1): 79–98.
65.
JohnsonKBUnertlKMChenQ, et al. (2011) Health information exchange usage in emergency departments and clinics: The who, what, and why. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association18(5): 690–697.
66.
JoyntKEOravEJJhaAK (2011) Thirty-day readmission rates for Medicare beneficiaries by race and site of care. JAMA305(7): 675–681.
KarhadePDongJQ (2021) Innovation outcomes of digitally enabled collaborative problemistic search capability. MIS Quarterly45(2): 693–718.
69.
KeenanKKuluHCoxF (2022) Editorial introduction: Social and spatial inequalities in health and mortality: The analysis of longitudinal register data from selected European countries. Population, Space and Place28(3): e2411.
70.
KhuntiaJMithasSAgarwalR (2017) How service offerings and operational maturity influence the viability of health information exchanges. Production and Operations Management26(11): 1989–2005.
71.
KimS (2009) Spatial inequality and economic development: Theories, facts, and policies. In: Urbanization and Growth. Washington, DC: World Bank, 133–166.
72.
KimSHKwonJ (2019) How do EHRs and a meaningful use initiative affect breaches of patient information?Information Systems Research30(4): 1184–1202.
73.
KohliRGroverV (2008) Business value of it: An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times. Journal of the Association for Information Systems9(1): 1.
74.
KontosEBlakeKDChouW-YS, et al. (2014) Predictors of eHealth usage: Insights on the digital divide from the health information national trends survey 2012. Journal of Medical Internet Research16(7): e172.
75.
KrakowMHesseBWOhA, et al. (2019) Addressing rural geographic disparities through health IT: Initial findings from the health information national trends survey. Medical Care57: S127–S132.
76.
KupermanGJ (2011) Health-information exchange: Why are we doing it, and what are we doing?Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association18(5): 678–682.
77.
LakerLFFroehleCMWindelerJB, et al. (2018) Quality and efficiency of the clinical decision-making process: Information overload and emphasis framing. Production and Operations Management27(12): 2213–2225.
78.
LammersEJAdler-MilsteinJKocherKE (2014) Does health information exchange reduce redundant imaging? Evidence from emergency departments. Medical Care52(3): 227–234.
79.
LeeJYSwinkMPandejpongT (2011) The roles of worker expertise, information sharing quality, and psychological safety in manufacturing process innovation: An intellectual capital perspective. Production and Operations Management20(4): 556–570.
80.
LiSXSandinoT (2018) Effects of an information sharing system on employee creativity, engagement, and performance. Journal of Accounting Research56(2): 713–747.
81.
LiYLuLXLuSF, et al. (2022) The value of health information technology interoperability: Evidence from interhospital transfer of heart attack patients. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management24(2): 827–845.
82.
LiZMerrellMAEberthJM, et al. (2023) Successes and barriers of health information exchange participation across hospitals in South Carolina from 2014 to 2020: Longitudinal observational study. JMIR Medical Informatics11(1): e40959.
83.
LinSCJhaAKAdler-MilsteinJ (2018) Electronic health records associated with lower hospital mortality after systems have time to mature. Health Affairs37(7): 1128–1135.
84.
LinY-KLinMChenH (2019) Do electronic health records affect quality of care? Evidence from the HITECH Act. Information Systems Research30(1): 306–318.
85.
LindbeckASnowerDJ (2000) Multitask learning and the reorganization of work: From Tayloristic to holistic organization. Journal of Labor Economics18(3): 353–376.
86.
LindleyJMachinS (2014) Spatial changes in labour market inequality. Journal of Urban Economics79: 121–138.
87.
LutfiyyaMNMcCuloughJEHallerIV (2012) Impact of rurality on processes and outcomes in appendicitis. Journal of Rural Health28(2): 128–135.
88.
MarmotM (2020) Health equity in England: The Marmot review 10 years on. BMJ368: 693.
89.
McCoyJHLeeHL (2014) Using fairness models to improve equity in health delivery fleet management. Production and Operations Management23(6): 965–977.
90.
MehraALangerNBapnaR, et al. (2014) Estimating returns to training in the knowledge economy: A firm-level analysis of small and medium enterprises. MIS Quarterly38(3): 757–771.
91.
MenachemiNBurkhardtJShewchukR, et al. (2006) Hospital information technology and positive financial performance: A different approach to finding an ROI. Journal of Healthcare Management51(1): 40–58.
92.
MengFQiJZhangM, et al. (2015) A robust optimization model for managing elective admission in a public hospital. Operations Research63(6): 1452–1467.
93.
MichelOGarcia ManjonAJPasquierJ, et al. (2021) How do nurses spend their time? A time and motion analysis of nursing activities in an internal medicine unit. Journal of Advanced Nursing77(11): 4459–4470.
94.
National Rural Health Association (2022) About rural health care.
95.
NiewoehnerRJDiwasKStaatsB (2023) Physician discretion and patient pick-up: How familiarity encourages multitasking in the emergency department. Operations Research71(3): 958–978.
96.
ONC (2021a) Rural health information exchange.
97.
ONC (2021b) State health information exchange program.
98.
OzcanYA (2008) Health Care Benchmarking and Performance Evaluation: An Assessment Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). New York: Springer.
99.
ParkerKHorowitzJBrownA, et al. (2018) What Unites and Divides Urban, Suburban and Rural Communities. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
100.
ProbstJEberthJMCrouchE (2019) Structural urbanism contributes to poorer health outcomes for rural America. Health Affairs38(12): 1976–1984.
101.
PyeJRaiADongJQ (2025) How hospitals differentiate health information technology portfolios for clinical care efficiency: Insights from the HITECH Act. Information Systems Research36(1): 239–260.
102.
QueenanCCameronKSnellA, et al. (2019) Patient heal thyself: Reducing hospital readmissions with technology-enabled continuity of care and patient activation. Production and Operations Management28(11): 2841–2853.
103.
RajapaksheTKumarSSenA, et al. (2020) Sustainability planning for healthcare information exchanges with supplier rebate program. Operations Research68(3): 793–817.
104.
RatwaniRMSavageEWillA, et al. (2018) A usability and safety analysis of electronic health records: A multi-center study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association25(9): 1197–1201.
105.
RaviSVenablesWN (2005) Social and political implications of geospatial disparities: A case study of the Indian subcontinent. Geographical Journal171(2): 145–159.
106.
RomeroJSchwartzmanF (2018) Inequality in and across cities. Economic Brief (18-10).
107.
RossSESchillingLMFernaldDH, et al. (2010) Health information exchange in small-to-medium sized family medicine practices: Motivators, barriers, and potential facilitators of adoption. International Journal of Medical Informatics79(2): 123–129.
108.
RothATuckerALVenkataramanS, et al. (2019) Being on the productivity frontier: Identifying “triple aim performance” hospitals. Production and Operations Management28(9): 2165–2183.
109.
Rural Health Information Hub (2021) Rural health information exchange.
110.
SaghafianSHoppWJ (2020) Can public reporting cure healthcare? The role of quality transparency in improving patient–provider alignment. Operations Research68(1): 71–92.
111.
SarkarIN (2022) Transforming health data to actionable information: Recent progress and future opportunities in health information exchange. Yearbook of Medical Informatics31(01): 203–214.
112.
ShapiroJS (2007) Evaluating public health uses of health information exchange. Journal of Biomedical Informatics40(6): S46–S49.
113.
SharmaLChandrasekaranABoyerKK, et al. (2016) The impact of health information technology bundles on hospital performance: An econometric study. Journal of Operations Management41: 25–41.
114.
SinghDA (2015) Essentials of the US Health Care System. 4th ed.Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
115.
SongHTuckerALMurrellKL, et al. (2018) Closing the productivity gap: Improving worker productivity through public relative performance feedback and validation of best practices. Management Science64(6): 2628–2649.
116.
ThompsonSWhitakerJKohliR, et al. (2020) Chronic disease management: How IT and analytics create healthcare value through the temporal displacement of care. MIS Quarterly44(1): 227–256.
117.
TongYTanC-HSiaCL, et al. (2022) Rural–urban healthcare access inequality challenge: Transformative roles of information technology. MIS Quarterly46(4): 1937–1982.
118.
VenkateshVZhangXSykesTA (2011) “Doctors do too little technology”: A longitudinal field study of an electronic healthcare system implementation. Information Systems Research22(3): 523–546.
119.
VestJRCampionTRKaushalR, et al. (2013) Challenges, alternatives, and paths to sustainability for health information exchange efforts. Journal of Medical Systems37: 1–8.
120.
VestJRGammLD (2010) Health information exchange: Persistent challenges and new strategies. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association17(3): 288–294.
121.
VestJRKernLMSilverMD, et al. (2015) The potential for community-based health information exchange systems to reduce hospital readmissions. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association22(2): 435–442.
122.
VestJRUnruhMACasalinoLP, et al. (2020) The complementary nature of query-based and directed health information exchange in primary care practice. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association27(1): 73–80.
123.
VestJRUnruhMAShapiroJS, et al. (2019) The associations between query-based and directed health information exchange with potentially avoidable use of health care services. Health Services Research54(5): 981–993.
124.
WalkerDM (2018) Does participation in health information exchange improve hospital efficiency?Health Care Management Science21(3): 426–438.
125.
WangYZhangMRoehrichJK, et al. (2025) Scaling emerging healthcare technology: Managing paradoxical tensions in a connected health platform. Journal of Operations Management72(2): 233–256.
126.
WaniDMalhotraM (2018) Does the meaningful use of electronic health records improve patient outcomes?Journal of Operations Management60: 1–18.
127.
World Health Organization (2018) Health inequities and their causes.
128.
YaraghiNDuAYSharmanR, et al. (2015) Health information exchange as a multisided platform: Adoption, usage, and practice involvement in service co-production. Information Systems Research26(1): 1–18.
129.
YeowAGohKH (2015) Work harder or work smarter? Information technology and resource allocation in healthcare processes. MIS Quarterly39(4): 763–786.
130.
ZammutoRFGriffithTLMajchrzakA, et al. (2007) Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organization Science18(5): 749–762.
131.
ZhangLPangM-SWattalS (2024) Does sharing make my data more insecure? An empirical study on health information exchange and data breaches. MIS Quarterly48(3): 873–898.
132.
ZhangSHCheungKL (2011) The impact of information sharing and advance order information on a supply chain with balanced ordering. Production and Operations Management20(2): 253–267.
133.
ZhangXHailuBTaborDC, et al. (2019) Role of health information technology in addressing health disparities: Patient, clinician, and system perspectives. Medical Care57(Suppl 6 2): S115.
134.
ZhouMLiXBurtchG (2024) Healthcare across boundaries: Urban–rural differences in the consequences of telehealth adoption. Information Systems Research35(3): 1092–1113.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
