The authors developed a multilevel interactive model for predicting social loafing behavior in groups and tested this model in a study of 367 individuals working in 102 groups during a 4-month period. Study results revealed the importance of integrating both person (preference for group work and winning orientation) and situation (task interdependence) factors in predicting social loafing. Preference for group work was consistently and negatively related to social loafing behavior (self-reported and peer rated), and this relationship was moderated by both winning orientation and task interdependence. As predicted, group members were more likely to self-report social loafing when their preference for group work and winning orientation were both low. Peer-rated social loafing was most likely when preference for group work, winning orientation, and task interdependence were all low, as predicted. Theoretical and practical implications of the results are addressed, and several directions for future research are outlined.
Ajzen, I. (1989). Attitude structure and behavior. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler , & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude, structure and function (pp. 241-274). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Albanese, R., & Van Fleet, D.D. (1985). Rational behavior in groups: The free-riding tendency. Academy of Management Review, 10, 244-255.
3.
Barber, A.E., Rau, B.L., & Simmering, M.J. (1996, August). Compensation policies and organizational attraction in information-rich settings. Paper presented at the 56th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management , Cincinnati, OH.
4.
Barua, A., Sophie-Lee, C.H., & Whinston, A.B. (1995). Incentives and computing systems for team-based organizations. Organization Science , 4, 487-504.
5.
Blackburn, R., & Rosen, B. (1994, August). Human resource management practices and total quality management. Paper presented at the 54th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, GA.
6.
Bowles, H.R., Babcock, L., & McGinn, K.L. (2005). Constraints and triggers: Situational mechanics of gender in negotiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 951-965.
7.
Campion, M.A., Medsker, G.A., & Higgs, C.A. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46, 823-850.
8.
Campion, M.A., Papper, E.M., & Medsker, G.A. (1996). Relations between work team characteristics and effectiveness: A replication and extension. Personnel Psychology , 49, 429-452.
9.
Chen, Y., & Church, A.H. (1993). Reward allocation preferences in groups and organizations . International Journal of Conflict Management, 4, 25-59.
10.
Cohen, S.G., & Bailey, D.E. (1997). What makes team work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management , 23, 239-289.
11.
Comer, D.R. (1995). A model of social loafing in real work groups . Human Relations, 48, 647-667.
12.
Cummings, T.G. (1981). Designing effective work groups. In P. C. Nystrom & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organization design (Vol. 2, pp. 250-271). New York: Oxford University Press.
13.
DeMatteo, J.S., Eby, L.T., & Sundstrom, E. (1998). Team-based rewards: Current empirical evidence and directions for future research. Research in Organizational Behavior, 20, 141-183.
14.
Driskell, J.E., & Salas, E. (1992). Collective behavior and team performance. Human Factors, 34, 277-288.
15.
Duffy, M.K., Shaw, J.D., & Stark, E.M. (2000). Performance and satisfaction in conflicted, interdependent groups: When and how does self-esteem make a difference?Academy of Management Journal, 43, 772-784.
16.
Dweck, C.S., & Elliot, E.S. (1983). Achievement motivation. In E. M. Hertherington (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Socialization, personality and social development (Vol. 4, pp. 643-691). New York: John Wiley.
17.
Eby, L.T., & Dobbins, G.H. (1997). Collectivistic orientation in teams: An individual and group-level analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior , 18, 275-295.
18.
Evans, M.G. (1985). A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36, 305-323.
19.
Franken, R.E., & Brown D.J. (1996). The need to win is not adaptive. Personality and Individual Di ferences, 20, 805-808.
20.
Franken, R.E., Hill, R., & Kierstead, J. (1994). Sport interest as predicted by the personality measures of competitiveness, mastery, instrumentality, expressivity, and sensation seeking. Personality and Individual Di ferences, 17, 467-476.
21.
Franken, R.E., & Prpich, W. (1996). Dislike of competition and the need to win: Self-image concerns, performance concerns, and the distraction of attention. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 695-712.
22.
Ganster, D.C., Fusilier, M.R., & Mayes, B.T. (1986). Role of social support in the experience of stress at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 102-110.
23.
George, J.M. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic origins of perceived social loafing in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 191-202.
24.
George, J.M. (1995). Asymmetrical effects of rewards and punishments: The case of social loafing. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 68, 327-338.
25.
Gladstein, D.L. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness . Administrative Science Quarterly,29, 499-517.
26.
Graziano, W.G., Hair, E.C., & Finch, J.F. (1997). Competitiveness mediates the link between personality and group performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 73, 1394-1408.
27.
Hackman, J.R., & Oldham, G.R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA : Addison-Wesley.
28.
Harkins, S.G., & Jackson, J.M. (1985). The role of evaluation in eliminating social loafing . Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 457-465.
29.
Hofmann, D.A., Griffin, M.A., & Gavin, M.B. (2000). The application of hierarchical linear modeling to organizational research. In K. J. Klein & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 467-511). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
30.
Houston, J.M., McIntire, J.K., & Terry, C. (2002). A factor analysis of scales measuring competitiveness . Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62, 284-298.
31.
Ilgen, D.R. (1999). Teams embedded in organizations: Some implications . American Psychologist, 54, 129-139.
32.
James, L.R., Demaree, R.G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology , 69, 85-98.
33.
Kerr, N.L., & Bruun, S.E. (1981). Ringelmann revisited: Alternative explanations for the social loafing effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 224-231.
34.
Kerr, N.L., & Bruun, S.E. (1983). Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: Free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78-94.
35.
Kidwell, R.E., & Bennett, N. (1993). Employee propensity to withhold effort: A conceptual model to intersect three avenues of research. Academy of Management Review, 18, 429-456.
36.
Kiggundu, M.N. (1983). Task interdependence and job design: A test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 31, 145-172.
37.
Kugihara, N. (1999). Gender and social loafing in Japan. Journal of Social Psychology, 139, 516-526.
38.
LePine, J.A., & Van Dyne, L. (1998). Predicting voice behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 853-868.
39.
Liden, R.C., Wayne, S.J., Jaworski, R.A., & Bennett, N. (2004). Social loafing: A field investigation. Journal of Management, 30, 285-304.
40.
Mischel, W. (1977). The interaction of person and situation. In D. Magnusson & N. S. Endler (Eds.), Personality and the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology (pp. 333-352). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
41.
Moorman, R.H., & Blakely, G.L. (1995). Individualism-collectivism as an individual difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 127-142.
42.
Neuman, G.A., Wagner, S.H., & Christiansen, N.D. (1999). The relationship between work-team personality composition and the job performance of teams. Group & Organization Management, 24, 28-45.
43.
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
44.
Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hiearchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
Robinson, S.L., & O'Leary-Kelly, A.M. (1998). Monkey see, monkey do: The influence of work groups on the antisocial behavior of employees. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 658-672.
46.
Shaw, J.D., Duffy, M.K., & Stark, E.M. (2000). Interdependence and preference for group work: Main and congruent effects on the satisfaction and performance of group members . Journal of Management, 26, 259-279.
47.
Shepperd, J.A. (1993). Productivity loss in performance groups: A motivation analysis. Psychological Bulletin,113, 67-81.
48.
Snyder, M., & Ickes, W. (1985). Personality and social behavior. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 883-947). New York: Random House.
49.
Van de Ven, A.H., Delbecq, A.L., & Koenig, R. (1976). Determinants of coordination modes within organizations . American Sociological Review, 41, 322-338.
50.
Van Dyne, L., Vandewalle, D., Kostova, T., Latham, M.E., & Cummings, L.L. (2000). Collectivism, propensity to trust, and self-esteem as predictors of organizational citizenship in a non-work setting. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21, 3-23.
51.
Veiga, J.F. (1991). The frequency of self-limiting behavior in groups: A measure and an explanation. Human Relations, 44, 855-895.
52.
Wagner, J.A., III. (1995). Studies of individualism-collectivism: Effects cooperation in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 152-172.
53.
Williams, K.D., Harkins, S.G., & Latane, B. (1981). Identifiability as a deterrent to social loafing: Two cheering experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 303-311.
