This study conceptualized exploratory and exploitative learning as distinct team-level activities, constructed measures of them, and examined their relationships with psychological safety, task conflict, and team performance. Structural equation analysis in a sample of 142 innovation project teams indicated that psychological safety was linearly and nonlinearly related to team exploitative and exploratory learning, respectively; whereas task conflict positively moderated the relationship between psychological safety and exploitative learning. Furthermore, exploratory and exploitative learning were additively related to team performance, as rated by team managers, and mediated its relationship with psychological safety. The findings contribute to understanding how and under what conditions organizational teams engage in exploratory and exploitative learning to maximize their performance.
Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. ( 2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61, 1139-1160.
5.
Baum, J.A.C., Li, S.X., & Usher, J.M. ( 2000). Making the next move: How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains’ acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 766-801.
Blau, P.M. ( 1977). Inequality and heterogeneity. New York, NY: Free Press.
8.
Bliese, P.D. ( 2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In K. J. Klein, & S. W. J. Kozlowski (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349-382). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/ Pfeiffer.
9.
Bliese, P.D., & Halverson, R.R. (1998). Group size and measures of group-level properties: An examination of eta-squared and ICC values. Journal of Management, 24, 157-172.
10.
Bollen, K.A. ( 1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.
11.
Bunderson, J.S., & Sutcliffe, K.M. (2003). Management team learning orientation and business unit performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 552-560.
12.
Carmeli, A. ( 2008). Top management team behavioral integration and the performance of service organizations. Group & Organization Management , 33, 712-735.
13.
Carmeli, A., & Gittell, J.H. ( 2009). High-quality relationships, psychological safety, and learning from failures in work organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 709-729.
14.
Chi, N.W., Huang, Y.M., & Lin, S.C. ( 2009). A double-edged sword? Exploring the curvilinear relationship between organizational tenure diversity and team innovation: The moderating role of team-oriented HR practices. Group & Organization Management, 34, 698-726.
15.
Choi, J.N.Anderson, T.A., & Veillette, A. ( 2009). Contextual inhibitors of employee creativity in organizations: The insulating role of creative ability. Group & Organization Management, 34, 330-357.
16.
Choo, A.S., Linderman., K. W., & Schroeder, R.G. (2007). Method and psychological effects on learning behaviors and knowledge creation in quality improvement projects. Management Science, 53, 437-450.
17.
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.G., & Aiken, L.S. ( 2003). Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
Crossan, M. ( 1998). Improvisation in action. Organization Science, 9, 593-599.
19.
Crossan, M.M., Lane, R.E., & White R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24, 522-537.
20.
De Dreu, C.K.W. ( 2006). When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. Journal of Management, 32, 82-107.
21.
De Dreu, C.K.W., & Weingart, L.R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team effectiveness, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis . Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741-749.
22.
Dougherty, D. ( 1992). Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science, 3, 179-202.
23.
Edmondson, A.C. ( 1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams . Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350-383.
24.
Edmondson, A.C. ( 2002). The local and variegated nature of learning in organizations: A group-level perspective. Organization Science, 13, 128-146.
25.
Edmondson, A.C. ( 2003). Speaking up in the operating room: How team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1419-1452.
26.
Edmondson, A.C., & Nembhard I.M. ( 2009). Product development and learning in project teams: The challenges are the benefits. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26, 123-138.
27.
Fornell, C., & Lacker, D.F. ( 1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research , 18, 39-50.
28.
Gibson, C.B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 209-226.
29.
Gilson, L.L., Mathieu, J.E., Shalley, C.E., & Ruddy, T.M. ( 2005). Creativity and standardization: Complementary or conflicting drivers of team effectiveness? Academy of Management Journal , 49, 521-531.
30.
Gilson, L.L., & Shalley, C.E. ( 2004). A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams’ engagement in creative processes. Journal of Management, 30, 453-470.
31.
Groysberg, B., & Lee, L.E. ( 2009). Hiring stars and their colleagues: Exploration and exploitation in professional service firms. Organization Science, 20, 740-758.
32.
Haas, M.R. ( 2010). The double-edged swords of autonomy and external knowledge: Analyzing team effectiveness in a multinational organization. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 989-1008.
Han, T.Y., & Williams, K.J. (2008). Multilevel investigation of adaptive performance individual- and team-level relationships. Group & Organization Management, 33, 657-684.
35.
Hansen, M. ( 1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82-111.
36.
Hargadon, A.B. ( 1999). Group cognition and creativity in organizations. In M. A. Neale, E. A. Mannix, & R. Wageman (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (pp. 137-155). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
37.
He, Z.L., & Wong, P.K. ( 2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15, 481-494.
38.
Hinds, P.J., & Mortensen, M. ( 2005). Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organization Science, 16, 290-307.
39.
Hirst G., Van Knippenberg, D.V., & Zhou, J. ( 2009). A cross-level perspective on employee creativity: Goal orientation, team learning behavior, and individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 280-293.
40.
Hoopes, D.G., & Postrel, S. ( 1999). Shared knowledge, "glitches," and product development performance. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 837-865.
41.
Hulsheger, U.R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J.F. ( 2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1128-1145.
42.
Ilgen, D., Hollenbeck, J., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. ( 2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517-543.
43.
Im, G., & Rai, A. ( 2008). Knowledge sharing ambidexterity in long-term interorganizational relationships. Management Science, 54, 1281-1296.
44.
James, L.R., (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement . Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 219-229.
45.
James, L.R., Demaree, R.G., & Wolf, G. ( 1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
46.
Jansen, J.J.P., van den Bosch, F.A.J., & Volberda, H.W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52, 1661-1674.
47.
Jansen, J.J.P., Tempelaar, M., van den Bosch, F.A.J., & Volberda, H.W. (2009). Structural differentiation and ambidexterity: The mediating role of integration mechanisms. Organization Science, 20, 797-811.
48.
Jehn, K.A. ( 1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256-282.
49.
Jehn, K.A., & Mannix, E.A. ( 2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238-251.
50.
Kang, S.C., & Snell, S. ( 2009). Intellectual capital architectures and ambidextrous learning: A framework for human resource management. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 65-92.
51.
Kark, R., & Carmeli, A. ( 2009). Alive and creating: The mediating role of vitality and aliveness in the relationship between psychological safety and creative work involvement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 785-804.
52.
Katila, R., & Ahuja, G. ( 2002). Something old, something new: A longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1183-1194.
53.
Kazanjian, R.K., Drazin, R., & Glynn, M.A. ( 2000). Creativity and technological learning: The roles of organization architecture and crisis in large-scale projects. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17, 273-298.
54.
Kline, R.B. ( 2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling . New York, NY: Guilford.
55.
Lavie, D., Stettner, U., & Tushman, M.L. ( 2010). Exploration and exploitation within and across organizations . Academy of Management Annals, 4, 109-155.
56.
Levinthal, D.A., & March, J.G. ( 1993). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning . Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95-112.
57.
Liang, D.W., Moreland, R.L., & Argote, L. ( 1995). Group versus individual training and group performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 384-393.
58.
London, M., & Sessa, V.I. ( 2007). How groups learn, continuously. Human Resource Management, 46, 651-669.
59.
Lubatkin, M.H., Simsek, Z., Ling, Y., & Veiga, J.F. ( 2006). Ambidexterity and performance in small- to medium-sized firms: The pivotal role of top management team behavioral integration. Journal of Management, 32, 646-672.
60.
MacKinnon, D.P., Lockwood, C.M., Hoffman, J.M., West, S.G., & Sheets, V. ( 2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, 7, 83-104.
61.
March, J.G. ( 1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning . Organization Science, 2, 71-87.
62.
Marks, M.A., Mathieu, J.E., & Zaccaro, S.J. ( 2001). A temporally-based framework and taxonomy of team processes . Academy of Management Review, 26, 358-376.
63.
Marks, M.A., Sabella, M.J., Burke, C.S., & Zaccaro, S.J. ( 2002). The impact of cross-training on team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 3-13.
64.
Mathieu, J.E., Maynard, M.T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. ( 2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410-476.
65.
McNamara, G.M., Luce, R.A., & Tompson, G.H. ( 2002). Examining the effect of complexity in strategic group knowledge structures on firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 153-170.
66.
Miller, S.T., & Ross, M. ( 1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82, 93-118.
67.
Mom, T.J.M., van den Bosch, F.A.J., & Volberda, H.W. (2007). Investigating managers’ exploration and exploitation activities: The influence of top-down, bottom-up, and horizontal knowledge inflows. Journal of Management Studies , 44, 910-931.
68.
Mullen, M.R. ( 1995). Diagnosing measurement equivalence in cross-national research. Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 573-596.
69.
Nunnally, J.C., & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
70.
Olson, B.J., Parayitam, S., & Bao, Y. ( 2007). Strategic decision making: The effects of cognitive diversity, conflict, and trust on decision outcomes. Journal of Management , 33, 196-222.
71.
Patterson, M.G., West, M.A., Shackleton, V., Dawson, J.F., Lawthom, R., Maitlis, S., . . . Wallace, A. ( 2005). Validating the organizational climate measure: Links to managerial practices, productivity and innovation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 379-408.
72.
Peters, L., & Karren, R.J. ( 2009). An examination of the roles of trust and functional diversity on virtual team performance ratings. Group & Organization Management, 34, 479-504.
73.
Ping, R.A.J. ( 1995). A parsimonious estimating technique for interaction and quadratic latent variables. Journal of Marketing Research , 32, 336-347.
74.
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies . Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
75.
Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management , 34, 375-409.
Robson, M., Katsikeas, C.S., & Bello, D.C. ( 2008). Drivers and performance outcomes of trust in international strategic alliances: The role of organizational complexity. Organization Science,19, 647-665.
78.
Rousseau, D.M. ( 1985). Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Research in Organizational Behavior , 7, 1-37.
79.
Salas, E., DiazGranados, D., Klein, C., Burke, C.S., Stagl, K.C., Goodwin, G.F., & Halpinet, S.M. (2008). Does team training improve team performance? A meta-analysis. Human Factors, 50, 903-933.
80.
Tekleab, A.G., Quigley, N.R., & Tesluk, P.E. ( 2009). A longitudinal study of team conflict, conflict management, cohesion, and team Effectiveness. Group & Organization Management, 34, 170-205.
81.
Van der Vegt, G.S., & Bunderson, J.S. (2005). Learning and performance in multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification . Academy of Management Journal, 48, 532-547.
82.
Wilson, J.M., Goodman, P.S., & Cronin, M.A. ( 2007). Group learning, Academy of Management Review, 31, 1041-1059.
83.
Wong, S.S. ( 2004). Distal and local group learning: Performance trade-offs and tensions. Organizational Science, 15, 645-656.
84.
Wong, S-S. ( 2008). Task knowledge overlap and knowledge variety: The role of advice network structures and impact on group effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 591-614.
85.
Yagil, D., & Luria, G. ( 2010). Friends in need: The protective effect of social relationships under low safety climate. Group & Organization Management , 35, 727-750.
86.
Zhang, Z.X., Hempel, P.S., Han, Y.L., & Tjosvold, D. ( 2007). Transactive memory system links work team characteristics and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1722-1730.
