A Longitudinal Investigation of the Relationship Between Weekly Group Affective Tone and Next-Week Team Creativity via Temporal Team Regulatory Focus: The Moderating Role of Person-Group Fit
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2025
A Longitudinal Investigation of the Relationship Between Weekly Group Affective Tone and Next-Week Team Creativity via Temporal Team Regulatory Focus: The Moderating Role of Person-Group Fit
Drawing on the dynamic perspective of regulatory focus theory, this study posits that weekly fluctuations in group affective tone (GAT) influence team creativity in the following week through distinct forms of team regulatory focus. Additionally, we theorized that person-group fit (P-G fit) moderates the dynamic relationships among weekly GAT, temporal team regulatory focus, and subsequent team creativity. Using a weekly experience sampling method (ESM), we collected longitudinal data from 58 teams over 4 weeks, yielding 173 weekly team responses. The results of multilevel path-analyses indicated that: (a) weekly PGAT is positively related to temporal team promotion focus, which in turn increases next-week team creativity; (b) weekly NGAT reduces next-week team creativity through increasing temporal team prevention focus, and P-G fit strengthens this indirect effect. Notably, this study also tested and ruled out the reverse causal relationship between team creativity and GAT, thereby providing a more rigorous examination of the proposed model.
AmabileT. M.BarsadeS. G.MuellerJ. S.StawB. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367–403. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367
2.
AndersonJ. C.GerbingD. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
3.
BaasM.De DreuC. K.NijstadB. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus?Psychological Bulletin, 134(6), 779–806. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012815
4.
BaasM.De DreuC. K.NijstadB. A. (2011). When prevention promotes creativity: The role of mood, regulatory focus, and regulatory closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(5), 794–809. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022981
BartelC. A.SaavedraR. (2000). The collective construction of work group moods. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 197–231. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667070
7.
BealD. J. (2015). ESM 2.0: State of the art and future potential of experience sampling methods in organizational research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2(1), 383–407. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032414-111335
8.
BernerthJ. B.AguinisH. (2016). A critical review and best‐practice recommendations for control variable usage. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 229–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12103
9.
BlieseP. D.MaltarichM. A.HendricksJ. L. (2018). Back to basics with mixed-effects models: Nine take-away points. Journal of Business and Psychology, 33(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-017-9491-z
10.
BrocknerJ.HigginsE. T. (2001). Regulatory focus theory: Implications for the study of emotions at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 35–66. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2972
11.
ChanD. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234–246. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.83.2.234
ChiN. W. (2019). Is support always good? Exploring whether supervisory support enhances or attenuates the beneficial effect of positive group affective tone on team and individual creativity. In Emotions and leadership (Vol. 15, pp. 133–157). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1746-979120190000015007
14.
ChiN.-W. (2021). The dual pathway model of group affective tone on team creativity: The role of team task complexity and supportive context. In PengK. Z.WuC.-H. (Eds.), Emotion and proactivity at work: Prospects and dialogues (pp. 237–260). Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1ks0hcg.17
15.
ChiN. W.ChangH. T.HuangH. L. (2015). Can personality traits and daily positive mood buffer the harmful effects of daily negative mood on task performance and service sabotage? A self-control perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 131, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.07.005
16.
ChiN. W.HuangJ. C. (2014). Mechanisms linking transformational leadership and team performance: The mediating roles of team goal orientation and group affective tone. Group & Organization Management, 39(3), 300–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601114522321
17.
ChiN. W.LamL. W. (2022). Is negative group affective tone always bad for team creativity? Team trait learning goal orientation as the boundary condition. Group & Organization Management, 47(1), 72–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011211011336
18.
ColeM. S.WalterF.BruchH. (2008). Affective mechanisms linking dysfunctional behavior to performance in work teams: A moderated mediation study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 945–958. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.945
19.
CollinsA. L.LawrenceS. A.TrothA. C.JordanP. J. (2013). Group affective tone: A review and future research directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1887
20.
DavisM. A. (2009). Understanding the relationship between mood and creativity A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.04.001
21.
De CoomanR.VantilborghT.BalM.LubX. (2016). Creating inclusive teams through perceptions of supplementary and complementary person–team fit: Examining the relationship between person–team fit and team effectiveness. Group & Organization Management, 41(3), 310–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115586910
22.
De DreuC. K. W.BaasM.NijstadB. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 739–756. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.5.739
23.
DeRueD. S.MorgesonF. P. (2007). Stability and change in person-team and person-role fit over time: The effects of growth satisfaction, performance, and general self-efficacy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(5), 1242–1253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1242
24.
Drach-ZahavyA.SomechA. (2001). Understanding team innovation: The role of team processes and structures. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 5(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.5.2.111
25.
EmichK. J.VincentL. C. (2020). Shifting focus: The influence of affective diversity on team creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 156(3), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.10.002
26.
FaddegonK.ScheepersD.EllemersN. (2008). If we have the will, there will be a way: Regulatory focus as a group identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(5), 880–895. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.483
27.
FredricksonB. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions?Review of General Psychology: Journal of Division 1, of the American Psychological Association, 2(3), 300–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300
28.
FredricksonB. L.BraniganC. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought‐action repertoires. Cognition & Emotion, 19(3), 313–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930441000238
29.
FriedmanR. S.FörsterJ. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1001–1013. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.6.1001
30.
GabrielA. S.PodsakoffN. P.BealD. J.ScottB. A.SonnentagS.TrougakosJ. P.ButtsM. M. (2019). Experience sampling methods: A discussion of critical trends and considerations for scholarly advancement. Organizational Research Methods, 22(4), 969–1006. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118802626
GeorgeJ. M. (2011). Dual tuning: A minimum condition for understanding affect in organizations?Organizational Psychology Review, 1(2), 147–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386610390257
34.
GeorgeJ. M.KingE. B. (2007). Potential pitfalls of affect convergence in teams: Functions and dysfunctions of group affective tone. In MannixE. A.NealeM. A.AndersonC. P. (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (Vol. 10, pp. 97–124). JAI Press.
35.
GeorgeJ. M.ZhouJ. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605–622. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.25525934
36.
GrawitchM. J.MunzD. C.KramerT. J. (2003). Effects of member mood states on creative performance in temporary workgroups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.7.1.41
HigginsE. T. (1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In ZannaM. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 1–46). Academic Press.
39.
HoggM. A.AbramsD. (1988). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. London: Taylor & Frances/Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203135457
40.
IliesR.ScottB. A.JudgeT. A. (2006). The interactive effects of personal traits and experienced states on intraindividual patterns of citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 561–575. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.21794672
41.
JudgeT. A.ScottB. A.IliesR. (2006). Hostility, job attitudes, and workplace deviance: Test of a multilevel model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.126
42.
KimM.ShinY. (2015). Collective efficacy as a mediator between cooperative group norms and group positive affect and team creativity. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 32(3), 693–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-015-9413-4
43.
KnightA. P.EisenkraftN. (2015). Positive is usually good, negative is not always bad: The effects of group affect on social integration and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), 1214–1227. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000006
44.
KoopmannJ.LanajK.BonoJ.CampanaK. (2016). Daily shifts in regulatory focus: The influence of work events and implications for employee well‐being. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(8), 1293–1316. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2105
45.
Kristof-BrownA. L.SeongJ. Y.DeGeestD.Park-W.-W.HongD.-S. (2011). Testing the homology of person-group fit: A multilevel analysis of supplementary and complementary fit. In Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management (AOM) Conference 2011, San Antonio, TX, 12–16 August 2011.
46.
KuppensT.YzerbytV. Y. (2012). Group-based emotions: The impact of social identity on appraisals, emotions, and behaviors. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 34(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2011.637474
47.
LanajK.ChangC. H.JohnsonR. E. (2012). Regulatory focus and work-related outcomes: A review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(5), 998–1034. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027723
48.
LanajK.JohnsonR. E.LeeS. M. (2016). Benefits of transformational behaviors for leaders: A daily investigation of leader behaviors and need fulfillment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(2), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000052
49.
LeBretonJ. M.MoellerA. N.WittmerJ. L. S. (2023). Data aggregation in multilevel research: Best practice recommendations and tools for moving forward. Journal of Business and Psychology, 38(2), 239–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-022-09853-9
50.
LeBretonJ. M.SenterJ. L. (2008). Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods, 11(4), 815–852. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106296642
51.
LiC. R.LiC. X.LinC. J. (2018). How and when team regulatory focus influences team innovation and member creativity. Personnel Review, 47(1), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-09-2016-0236
52.
LiC.-R.LinC.-J.LiuJ. (2019). The role of team regulatory focus and team learning in team radical and incremental creativity. Group & Organization Management, 44(6), 1036–1066. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601118775196
53.
MasonC.GriffinM. (2003). Group absenteeism and positive affective tone: A longitudinal study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(6), 667–687. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.210
54.
NijstadB. A.De DreuC. K. (2012). Motivated information processing in organizational teams: Progress, puzzles, and prospects. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32(1), 87–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2012.11.004
55.
OwensB. P.HekmanD. R. (2016). How does leader humility influence team performance? Exploring the mechanisms of contagion and collective promotion focus. Academy of Management Journal, 59(3), 1088–1111. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0660
56.
PaulsenH. F. K.KlonekF. E.SchneiderK.KauffeldS. (2016). Group affective tone and team performance: A week-level study in project teams. Frontiers in Communication, 1(7), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2016.00007
57.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ.-Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
58.
PreacherK. J.CurranP. J.BauerD. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(4), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986031004437
59.
RheeS. Y. (2007). Group emotions and group outcomes: The role of group-member interactions. In MannixE. A.NealeM. A.AndersonC. P. (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (Vol. 10, pp. 65–96). JAI Press.
60.
RietzschelE. F. (2011). Collective regulatory focus predicts specific aspects of team innovation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(3), 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210392396
61.
SayreG. M.GrandeyA. A.ChiN. W. (2020). From cheery to “cheers”? Regulating emotions at work and alcohol consumption after work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(6), 597–618. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000452
62.
SeligJ. P.PreacherK. J. (2009). Mediation models for longitudinal data in developmental research. Research in Human Development, 6(2–3), 144–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427600902911247
63.
SeongJ. Y.ChoiJ. N. (2023). Multilevel homology and discontinuity of person–group fit on individual and team creativity. The Journal of Social Psychology, 163(2), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2021.1967844
64.
SeongJ. Y.Kristof‐BrownA. L. (2012). Testing multidimensional models of person‐group fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(6), 536–556. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941211252419
65.
SeongJ. Y.Kristof-BrownA. L.ParkW. W.HongD. S.ShinY. (2015). Person-group fit: Diversity antecedents, proximal outcomes, and performance at the group level. Journal of Management, 41(4), 1184–1213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312453738
66.
ShallyC. E.GilsonL. L.BlumT. C. (2009). Interactive effects of growth need strength, work context, and job complexity on self-reported creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.41330806
67.
ShinY.KimM.ChoiJ. N.LeeS.-H. (2016). Does team culture matter? Roles of team culture and collective regulatory focus in team task and creative performance. Group & Organization Management, 41(2), 232–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115584998
68.
ShinY. (2014). Positive group affect and team creativity: Mediation of team reflexivity and promotion focus. Small Group Research, 45(3), 337–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496414533618
69.
ShinY.KimM.LeeS. H. (2019). Positive group affective tone and team creative performance and change‐oriented organizational citizenship behavior: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(1), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.166
70.
SmithE. R. (1993). Social identity and social emotions: Toward new conceptualizations of prejudice. In MackieD. M.HamiltonD. L. (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 297–315). Academic Press.
71.
SmithE. R.SegerC. R.MackieD. M. (2007). Can emotions be truly group level? Evidence regarding four conceptual criteria. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 431–446. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.3.431
72.
StawB. M.SandelandsL. E.DuttonJ. E. (1981). Threat rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multilevel analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(4), 501–524. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392337
73.
SungS. Y.ChoiJ. N. (2021). Leader status behaviors and team creativity: The role of collective interactions and status conflict among members. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(8), 1120–1133. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2551
74.
ToM. L.AshkanasyN. M.FisherC. D. (2017). Affect and creativity in work teams. In SalasE.RicoR.PassmoreJ. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of the psychology of team working and collaborative processes (pp. 441–457). Wiley-Blackwell.
75.
ToM. L.FisherC. D. (2019). Affective influences on creativity in teams: A multilevel and regulatory focus perspective. In PaulusP.NijstadB. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of group creativity and innovation (pp. 103–117). Oxford University Press.
76.
ToM. L.FisherC. D.AshkanasyN. M.RoweP. A. (2012). Within-person relationships between mood and creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 599–612. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026097
77.
ToM. L.FisherC. D.AshkanasyN. M.ZhouJ. (2021). Feeling differently, creating together: Affect heterogeneity and creativity in project teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 42(9), 1228–1243. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2535
78.
TsaiW. C.ChiN. W.GrandeyA. A.FungS. C. (2012). Positive group affective tone and team creativity: Negative group affective tone and team trust as boundary conditions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(5), 638–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.775
79.
TurnerJ. C.ReynoldsK. J. (2012). Self-categorization theory. In Van LangeP. A. M.KruglanskiA. W.HigginsE. T. (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 399–417). Sage Publications Ltd.
80.
Van der VegtG. S.JanssenO. (2003). Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation. Journal of Management, 29(5), 729–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2063_03_00033-3
81.
WallaceJ. C.JohnsonP. D.FrazierM. L. (2009). An examination of the factorial, construct, and predictive validity and utility of the regulatory focus at work scale. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(6), 805–831. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.572
82.
ZhangZ.ZyphurM. J.PreacherK. J. (2009). Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models: Problems and solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 695–719. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108327450
83.
ZhouJ.HoeverI. J. (2014). Research on workplace creativity: A review and redirection. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 333–359. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091226
84.
ZhouQ.HirstG.ShiptonH. (2012). Context matters: Combined influence of participation and intellectual stimulation on the promotion focus–employee creativity relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(7), 894–909. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.779
