Burrow-centric distance-estimation methods inspired by surveillance behavior of fiddler crabs

Abstract

There are several ways to estimate the distance to an object based on visual information. Many robotic systems compute object distances based on disparity values or motion information. In addition to a disparity cue or image motion, research has shown that animals can possibly estimate the distance using the image size as well as the azimuth and elevation angles in their visual field. In this paper, inspired by the vigilance behavior of fiddler crabs, we suggest distance-estimation methods with several visual cues for engineering applications. A foraging fiddler crab can estimate the distance of an intruder from the burrow entrance. If the intruder is close to the burrow, the crab rushes back home to maintain possession of the burrow. In this study, we investigated burrow-centered distance-estimation methods based on visual information such as the retinal position, that is, the azimuth and elevation angles in an omnidirectional view as well as the image size and retinal speed of a target object. The methods show potential for engineering applications to the surveillance problem.

Keywords

Distance estimation exocentric distance vision fiddler crabs bio-inspired application

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brownell

(1984). Prey detection by the sand scorpion. Scientific American, 251(6), 86–97.

Cartwright

Collett

(1983). Landmark learning in bees. Journal of Comparative Physiology, A, 151(4), 521–543.

Hemmi

(2005). Predator avoidance in fiddler crabs: 2. The visual cues. Animal Behaviour, 69(3), 615–625.

Hemmi

Zeil

(2003a). Burrow surveillance in fiddler crabs. I. Description of behaviour. Journal of Experimental Biology, 206(22), 3935–3950.

Hemmi

Zeil

(2003b). Burrow surveillance in fiddler crabs. II. The sensory cues. Journal of Experimental Biology, 206(22), 3951–3961.

Huber

Kortenkamp

(2002). Using stereo vision to pursue moving agents with a mobile robot. In: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, vol. 3, pp. 2340–2346. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press.

Kim

(2006). Neural network mechanism for the orientation behavior of sand scorpions towards prey. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 17(4), 1070–1076.

Kim

Choe

(2010). Compensation for homing errors by using courtship structures as visual landmarks. Behavioral Ecology, 21(4), 836–842.

Land

Layne

(1995). The visual control of behaviour in fiddler crabs. Journal of Comparative Physiology, A, 177(1), 91–103.

10.

Méndez-Polanco

Muñoz Meléndez

Morales

(2009). People detection by a mobile robot using stereo vision in dynamic indoor environments. In MICAI 2009: advances in artificial intelligence, pp. 349–359. Guanajuato: Springer.

11.

Murray

Little

(2000). Using real-time stereo vision for mobile robot navigation. Autonomous Robots, 8(2), 161–171.

12.

Santana

Correia

(2010). A swarm cognition realization of attention, action selection, and spatial memory. Adaptive Behavior, 18(5), 428–447.

13.

Smolka

Hemmi

(2009). Topography of vision and behaviour. Journal of Experimental Biology, 212, 3522–3532.

14.

Smolka

Zeil

Hemmi

(2011). Natural visual cues eliciting predator avoidance in fiddler crabs. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 278(1724), 3584–3592.

15.

S.-E.

Kim

(2011a). Image-based homing navigation with landmark arrangement matching. Information Sciences, 181(16), 3427–3442.

16.

S.-E.

Kim

(2011b). Landmark vectors with quantized distance information for homing navigation. Adaptive Behavior, 19(2), 121–141.

17.

Zeil

(1998). Homing in fiddler crabs (Uca lactea annulipes and Uca vomeris: Ocypodidae). Journal of Comparative Physiology, A, 183(3), 367–377.

18.

Zeil

Hemmi

(2006). The visual ecology of fiddler crabs. Journal of Comparative Physiology, A, 192(1), 1–25.