The notion of structural coupling plays a central role in Maturana and Varela’s biology of cognition framework and strongly influenced Varela’s subsequent enactive elaboration of this framework. Building upon previous work using a glider in the Game of Life (GoL) cellular automaton as a toy model of a minimal autopoietic system with which to concretely explore these theoretical frameworks, this article presents an analysis of structural coupling between a glider and its environment. Specifically, for sufficiently small GoL universes, we completely characterize the nonautonomous dynamics of both a glider and its environment in terms of interaction graphs, derive the set of possible glider lives determined by the mutual constraints between these interaction graphs, and show how such lives are embedded in the state transition graph of the entire GoL universe.
AgmonE.GatesA. J.BeerR. D. (2016). The structure of ontogenies in a model protocell. Artificial Life, 22, 499–517.
2.
AgmonE.GatesA. J.ChuravyV.BeerR. D. (2016). Exploring the space of viable configurations in a model of metabolism-boundary co-construction. Artificial Life, 22, 153–171.
3.
AgmonE.GlazierJ. A.BeerR. D. (2017). Structural coupling of a Potts model cell. In KnibbeC.BeslonG.ParsonsD.MisevicD.Rouzaud-CornabasJ.BredecheN., et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Life 2017 (pp. 13–20). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
4.
BarandiaranX.RohdeM.Di PaoloE. A. (2009). Defining agency: Individuality, normativity, asymmetry and spatio-temporality in action. Adaptive Behavior, 17, 367–386.
5.
BarrettN. F. (2017). The normative turn in enactive theory: An examination of its roots and implications. Topoi, 36, 431–443.
6.
BeerR. D. (2004). Autopoiesis and cognition in the Game of Life. Artificial Life, 10, 309–326.
7.
BeerR. D. (2014). The cognitive domain of a glider in the Game of Life. Artificial Life, 20, 183–206.
8.
BeerR. D. (2015). Characterizing autopoiesis in the Game of Life. Artificial Life, 21(1), 1–19.
9.
BeerR. D. (2017). Computing aggregate properties of preimages in 2D cellular automata. Chaos, 27, Article 111104.
10.
BeerR. D. (2018). On the origin of gliders. In IkegamiT.VirgoN.WitkowskiO.OkaM.SuzukiR.IizukaH. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Artificial Life (pp. 67–74). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
11.
BiehlM.PolaniD. (2017). Action and perception for spatiotemporal patterns. In KnibbeC.BeslonG.ParsonsD.MisevicD.Rouzaud-CornabasJ.BredecheN., et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Life 2017 (pp. 68–75). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
12.
BourgineP.StewartJ. (2004). Autopoiesis and cognition. Artificial Life, 10, 327–345.
13.
BuhrmannT.Di PaoloE. A.BarandiaranX. (2013). A dynamical systems account of sensorimotor contingencies. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 285. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00285
14.
CarrollS. (2016). The big picture: On the origins of life, meaning, and the universe itself. London, England: Oneworld Publications.
15.
Di PaoloE. (2005). Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4, 429–452.
16.
Di PaoloE. (2018). The enactive conception of life. In NewenA.De BruinL.GallagherS. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of 4E cognition (pp. 71–94). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
17.
Di PaoloE.BurhmannT.BarandiaranX. E. (2017). Sensorimotor life: An enactive proposal. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
18.
EgbertM. D.Di PaoloE. A. (2009). Integrating autopoiesis and behavior: An exploration in computational chemo-ethology. Adaptive Behavior, 17, 387–401.
19.
FroeseT.TaguchiS. (2019). The problem of meaning in AI and robotics: Still with us after all these years. Philosophies, 4, Article 14. doi:10.3390/philosophies4020014
20.
FuchsC. A.SchackR. (2013). Quantum-Bayesian coherence. Reviews of Modern Physics, 85, 1693–1715.
21.
HuttoD. D.MyinE. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
22.
MaturanaH. R. (1978). Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In MillerG.A.LennebergE. (Eds.), Psychology and biology of language and thought: Essays in honor of Eric Lenneberg (pp. 27–63). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.
23.
MaturanaH. R. (1988). Reality: The search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 9, 25–82.
24.
MaturanaH. R. (2002). Autopoiesis, structural coupling and cognition: A history of these and other notions in the biology of cognition. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 9, 5–34.
25.
MaturanaH. R.VarelaF. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel. (Original work published 1973).
26.
McMullinB. (2004). Thirty years of computational autopoiesis. Artificial Life, 10, 277–295.
27.
NoëA. (2004). Action in perception. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
28.
RovelliC. (1996). Relational quantum mechanics. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 35, 1637–1678.
29.
StewartJ.GapenneO.Di PaoloE. A. (Eds.). (2010). Enaction: A new paradigm for cognitive science. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
30.
ThompsonE. (2007). Mind in life. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
31.
VarelaF. J.MaturanaH. R.UribeR. (1974). Autopoiesis: The organization of living systems, its characterization and a model. Biosystems, 5, 187–196.
32.
VarelaF. J. (1979). Principles of biological autonomy. New York, NY: North-Holland.
33.
VarelaF. J. (1988). Structural coupling and the origin of meaning in a simple cellular automata. In SercarzE. E.CeladaF.MitchisonN. A.TadaT. (Eds.), The semiotics of cellular communication in the immune system (NATO ASI Series, Vol. H23, pp. 151–161). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
34.
VarelaF. J. (1991). Organism: A meshwork of selfless selves. In TauberA. I. (Ed.), Organism and the origins of self (pp. 79–107). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
35.
VarelaF. J. (1997). Patterns of life: Intertwining identity and cognition. Brain and Cognition, 34, 72–87.
36.
VarelaF. J.CoutinoA.DupireB.VazN. (1988). Cognitive networks: Immune, neural and otherwise. In PerelsonA. (Ed.), Theoretical immunology, part II (pp. 359–375). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
37.
VarelaF. J.ThompsonE.RoschE. (1991). The embodied mind. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
38.
VillalobosM.WardD. (2015). Living systems: Autonomy, autopoiesis and enaction. Philosophy and Technology, 28, 225–239.
39.
von UexküllJ. (1957). A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: A picture book of invisible worlds. In SchillerC. L. (Ed. & Trans.), Instinctive behavior: The development of a modern concept (pp. 5–80). Madison, CT: International Universities Press. (Original work published 1934)
40.
WeberA.VarelaF. J. (2002). Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1, 97–125.
