Abstract
Background:
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), a form of temporary mechanical circulatory support, causes a prothrombotic state due to activation of inflammatory processes via exposure of blood to the circuit. Systemic anticoagulation is recommended to prevent thrombosis. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) and direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) are anticoagulant agents that inactivate thrombin; however, UFH requires antithrombin III (ATIII) for its activity, and patients supported by ECMO are at risk for acquired ATIII deficiency. In addition, heparin may cause heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, complicating therapy. Guidelines on anticoagulant use in ECMO reference UFH as a recommended agent with DTIs as an alternative option. Meta-analyses comparing the 2 agents in ECMO have evaluated efficacy and safety; however, discordant results prompt the need for additional research.
Objective:
The objective of this study is to evaluate differences in bleeding and thrombotic events between UFH and bivalirudin for anticoagulation during ECMO support.
Methods:
This study is a retrospective, single-center cohort study conducted at a primary ECMO center and a tertiary academic medical center.
Results:
Bleeding and systemic thrombosis rates were not different between bivalirudin and UFH (30 vs 33 events, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.55-1.47, P = 0.7; 12 vs 17 events, HR = 0.68; 95% CI = 0.32-1.42, P = 0.3); however, when controlled for covariates, device thrombosis was lower with bivalirudin (30.2% vs 43.4%, P = 0.017). Time in therapeutic range (TTR) was higher with bivalirudin (69.98% vs 55.5%, P < 0.001).
Conclusion and Relevance:
When compared to heparin, bivalirudin for anticoagulation in ECMO was associated with a decreased rate of device thrombosis and greater TTR.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
