Automatic episodes of aggressive or violent behaviour may occur during or after an epileptic fit. Epileptic automatisms are regarded by the law as ‘insane automatisms’. A person who commits a crime during the course of a seizure is therefore legally insane and must be committed to a psychiatric hospital. The law of insanity is inappropriate when applied to epileptic automatisms. A change in the law is therefore necessary to remove epileptic offenders from the legal ambit of insanity, and to save them the threat of detention in a mental hospital as a consequence of their crime.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Butler Committee Report on Mentally Abnormal offenders (1975). Cmnd6244, 238.
2.
Bratty v. Attorney General for Northern Ireland [1961] 3 All E.R. 523.
3.
FalconerM. A.TaylorD. C. (1970) Temporal lobe epilepsy: clinical features, pathology, diagnosis and treatment. In: PriceJ. H. (ed.) Modern Trends in Psychological Medicine. London, Butterworths.
4.
FeindelW.PenfieldW. (1954) Localization of discharge in temporal lobe automatism. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat.72, 605–30.
5.
FentonG. W. (1972) Epilepsy and automatism. Br. J. Hosp. Med.7, 57–64.
6.
FenwickP.FenwickE. (1985) Epilepsy and the Law. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
7.
GeierS.BancaudJ.TalairachJ.BonisA.EnjelvinM.Hossard-BouchardH. (1976) Automatisms during frontal lobe epileptic seizures. Brain99, 447–58.
8.
GeierS.BancaudJ.TalairachJ.BonisA.SziklaG.EnjelvinM. (1977) The seizures of frontal lobe epilepsy: A study of clinical manifestations. Neurology27, 951–8.
9.
GoldsteinA. (1967) The Insanity Defence, 19–20.
10.
GolubL. M.GuhlemanH. V.MerlisJ. K. (1951) Seizure patterns in psychomotor epilepsy. Dis. Nerv. Syst.12, 73.