“I Wanted to Raise My Hand and Say I’m Not a Feminist”: College Men’s Use of Hybrid Masculinities to Negotiate Attachments to Feminism and Gender Studies
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online October, 2017
“I Wanted to Raise My Hand and Say I’m Not a Feminist”: College Men’s Use of Hybrid Masculinities to Negotiate Attachments to Feminism and Gender Studies
Using a hybrid masculinities framework, we qualitatively analyzed 15 college men’s experiences with feminism and gender scholarship in Women’s and Gender Studies (WGS) courses. Men described adopting particular strategies of discourse in their social interactions to manage varied reactions to feminism and gender studies. As a way of justifying their choice of academic study, these men also learned to navigate social relationships by highlighting or downplaying their own masculinity (i.e., creating or deconstructing a hybrid masculinity). Finally, men reconciled the multiple meanings of feminism and WGS studies by drawing from dominant cultural norms and expectations in attempts to make sense of the incongruence of men studying feminism. Implications for future research and college campuses and educators are considered.
AlilunasP. (2011). The (in)visible people in the room: Men in women’s studies. Men and Masculinities, 14, 210-229.
2.
AndersonV. N. (2009). What’s in a label? Judgments of feminist men and feminist women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 206-215.
3.
ArxerS. L. (2011). Hybrid masculine power: Reconceptualizing the relationship between homosociality and hegemonic masculinity. Humanity & Society, 35, 390-422.
4.
BergerM. T.RadeloffC. L. (2014). Transforming scholarship: Why women’s and gender studies students are changing themselves and the world. New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
BerilaB.KellerJ.KroneC.LakerJ.MayersO. (2005). His story/her story: A dialogue about including men and masculinities in the women’s studies curriculum. Feminist Teacher, 16, 34-52.
6.
BridgesT. S. (2010). Men just weren’t made to do this: Performances of drag at “Walk a Mile in Her Shoes” marches. Gender & Society, 24, 5-30.
7.
BridgesT. S. (2014). A very “gay” straight? Hybrid masculinities, sexual aesthetics, and the changing relationship between masculinity and homophobia. Gender & Society, 28, 58-82.
8.
BridgesT. S.PascoeC. J. (2014). Hybrid masculinities: New directions in the sociology of men and masculinities. Sociology Compass, 8, 246-258.
9.
ButlerJ. (2004). Undoing gender. New York, NY: Routledge.
10.
CaseK. A. (2007). Raising male privilege awareness and reducing sexism: An evaluation of diversity courses. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 426-435.
ClatterbaughK. (2000). Literature of the U.S. men’s movements. Signs, 25, 883-894.
13.
ConnellR. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
14.
ConnellR. W.MesserschmidtJ. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19, 829-859.
15.
DemetriouD. (2001). Connell’s concept of hegemonic masculinity: A critique. Theory and Society, 30, 337-361.
16.
DeutschF. M. (2007). Undoing gender. Gender & Society, 21, 106-127.
17.
DigbyT. (Ed.). (1998). Men doing feminism. New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
FloodM. (2011). Men as students and teachers of feminist scholarship. Men and Masculinities, 14, 135-154.
19.
GaffneyK.MannoA. J. (2011). Navigating the gender box: Locating masculinity in the introduction to women and gender studies course. Men and Masculinities, 14, 190-209.
20.
GuckenheimerD.SchmidtJ. K. (2013). Contradictions within the classroom: Masculinities in feminist studies. Women’s Studies, 42, 486-508.
21.
HaddockG.ZannaM. P. (1994). Preferring “housewives” to “feminists”: Categorization and the favorability of attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 25-52.
22.
HardingS. (1998). Can men be subjects of feminist thought? In DigbyT. (Ed.), Men doing feminism (pp. 171-195). New York, NY: Routledge.
23.
HeasleyR. (2005). Queer masculinities of straight men: A typology. Men and Masculinities, 7, 310-320.
24.
HeathS. (1987). Male feminism. In JardineA.SmithP. (Eds.), Men in feminism (pp. 1-32). New York, NY: Methuen.
25.
HouvourasS.CarterJ. S. (2008). The F word: College students’ definitions of a feminist. Sociological Forum, 23, 234-256.
26.
KatzJ.SwindellS.FarrowS. (2004). Effects of participation in a first women’s studies course on collective self-esteem, gender-related attitudes, and emotional well-being. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 2179-2199.
27.
KaufmanM. (1999). Men, feminism and men’s contradictory experiences of power. In KuypersJ. A. (Ed.), Men and power (pp. 59-83). Halifax, VA: Fernwood Books.
28.
KaufmanM.KimmelM. S. (2011). The guy’s guide to feminism. Berkley, CA: Seal Press.
29.
KimmelM. S. (1987). Men’s responses to feminism at the turn of the century. Gender & Society, 1, 261-283.
30.
KimmelM. S. (1997). From conscience and common sense to “feminism for men”: Pro-feminist men’s rhetorics of support for women’s equality. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 17, 8-34.
31.
KimmelM. S. (1998). Who’s afraid of men doing feminism? In DigbyT. (Ed.), Men doing feminism (pp. 57-68). New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
Lutz-ZoisC. J.MolerK. A.BrownM. J. (2015). Mechanisms for the relationship between traditional masculine ideologies and rape myth acceptance among college men. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 24, 84-101.
33.
MacomberK. (2015). “I’m sure as hell not putting any man on a pedestal”: Male privilege and accountability in domestic and sexual violence work. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. doi: 10.1177/0886260515618944
34.
MessnerM. A. (1993). “Changing men” and feminist politics in the United States. Theory and Society, 22, 723-737.
35.
MessnerM. A.GreenbergM. A.PeretzT. (2015). Some men: Feminist allies and the movement to end violence against women. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
36.
MoiT. (2006). “I am not a feminist, but . . .”: How feminism became the F-word. The Modern Language Association of America, 121, 1735-1741.
37.
NewtonJ. (2002). Masculinity studies: The longed for profeminist movement for academic men? In GardinerJ. K. (Ed.), Masculinity studies & feminist theory: New directions (pp. 176-192). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
38.
PeaseB. (2000). Researching profeminist men’s narratives. In FawcettB.FeatherstoneB.FookJ.RossiterA. (Eds.), Practice and research in social work: Postmodern feminist perspectives (pp. 138-161). New York, NY: Routledge.
39.
PeaseB. (2002). (Re)Constructing men’s interests. Men and Masculinities, 5, 165-177.
40.
PleasantsR. K. (2011). Men learning feminism: Protecting privileges through discourses of resistance. Men and Masculinities, 14, 230-250.
41.
ReynoldsM. J.ShagleS.VenkataramanL. (2007). A national census of women’s and gender studies programs in U.S. institutions of higher education. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center, University of Chicago.
42.
RhodebeckL. A. (1996). The structure of men’s and women’s feminist orientations: Feminist identity and feminist opinion. Gender & Society, 10, 386-403.
43.
SchmittR. (1998). Profeminist men and their friends. In DigbyT. (Ed.), Men doing feminism (pp. 81-98). New York, NY: Routledge.
44.
SchmitzR. M.KazyakE. (2016). Checking privilege at the door: Men’s reflections on masculinity in women’s and gender studies courses. Gender Issues. doi:10.1007/s12147-016-9178-1
45.
StakeJ. E. (2007). Predictors of change in feminist activism through women’s and gender studies. Sex Roles, 57, 43-54.
46.
StakeJ. E.HoffmannF. L. (2001). Changes in student social attitudes, activism, and personal confidence in higher education: The role of women’s studies. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 411-436.
47.
StoltenbergJ. (1989). Refusing to be a man: Essays on sex and justice. Abingdon, UK: Breitenbush Books.
48.
ThomsenC. J.BasuA. M.ReinitzM. T. (1995). Effects of women’s studies courses on gender-related attitudes of women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 419-426.
49.
WestC.ZimmermanD. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1, 125-151.
50.
WhitmerJ. M. (2016). “A progression and a regression at the same time”: Hybrid masculinities and entrepreneurial selfhood. The Journal of Men’s Studies. doi: 10.1177/1060826516641101
51.
WorthenM. G. (2014). Blaming the jocks and the Greeks? Exploring collegiate athletes’ and fraternity/sorority members’ attitudes toward LGBT individuals. Journal of College Student Development, 55, 168-195.
