The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effects of race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status on consumer health care satisfaction ratings. The authors analyzed national data from the 2001 National Research Corporation Healthcare Market Guide Survey (N = 99 102). Four global and 3 composite ratings were examined. In general, satisfaction ratings were high across all global and composite measures; however, Asian/Pacific Islanders and Hispanics gave lower ratings than did whites, and African Americans gave a mix of higher and lower ratings (vs whites). Among the lowest ratings were those given by American Indians/Alaska Natives living in poverty. Race/ethnicity effects were independent of education and income. These findings are consistent with reports of continuing racial/ethnic disparities in both coverage and care. Programs to improve quality of care must specifically address these well-documented, severe, and persistent disparities.
US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010. Available at: http://www.healthypeople.gov.
2.
Institute of Medicine. Unequal Treatment: Confronting Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2002.
3.
Landon BE, Zaslavsky AM, Bernard SL, et al.Comparison of performance of traditional Medicare vs Medicare managed care. JAMA.2004;291:1744-1752.
4.
Cleary PD, McNeil BJ. Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care. Inquiry. 1988;25(1):25-36.
5.
Haviland MG, Morales LS, Reise SP, et al.Do health care ratings differ by race or ethnicity?Jt Comm J Qual Saf.2003;28:134-145.
6.
Morales LS, Elliott MN, Weech-Maldonado R, et al.Differences in CAHPS® adult survey reports and ratings by race and ethnicity: an analysis of the National CAHPS® benchmarking data 1.0. Health Serv Res.2001;36:595-617.
7.
Weech-Maldonado R, Elliott MN, Morales LS, et al.Health plan effects on patient assessments of Medicaid managed care among racial/ethnic minorities. J Gen Intern Med.2004;19:136-145.
8.
Lurie N, Zhan C, Sangl J, et al.Variation in racial and ethnic differences in consumer assessments of health care. Am J Manag Care.2003;9:502-509.
9.
Weech-Maldonado R, Morales LS, Elliott M, et al.Race/ethnicity, language, and patients’ assessments of care in Medicaid managed care. Health Serv Res.2003;38:789-808.
10.
Weech-Maldonado, Morales LS, Spritzer K, Elliott M, Hays RD. Racial and ethnic differences in parents’ assessments of pediatric care in Medicaid managed care. Health Serv Res.2001;36:575-594.
11.
US Census Bureau. Poverty 2001. Available at: http://www.census.gov/hhes/poverty/threshold/thresh01.html.
12.
Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika.1951;16:297-334.
13.
The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. American Indians and Alaska Natives: health coverage and access to care. Available at: http://www.kff.org/minorityhealth/loader.cfm?url=/commonspot/security/getfile.cfm&PageID=31131.
14.
Zuckerman S, Haley J, Roubideaux Y, et al.Health service access, use, and insurance coverage among American Indians/Alaska Natives and whites: what role does the Indian Health Service play?Am J Public Health. 2004;94(1):53-59.
15.
Katz RJ. Addressing the health care needs of American Indians and Alaska Natives. Am J Pubic Health. 2004;94(1):13-14.
16.
Hellinger FJ. The effect of managed care on quality: a review of recent evidence. Arch Intern Med.1998;158:833-841.
17.
US Department of Health and Human Services. Final Rural Healthy People 2010 document (volumes 1, 2, 3). Available at: http://www.srph.tamushsc.edu/rhp2010/publications.htm.
18.
Saha S, Hickam DH. Explaining low ratings of patient satisfaction among Asian-Americans. Am J Med Qual.2003;18:256-264.
19.
Embretson SE, Reise SP. Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2000.
20.
Morales LS, Reise SP, Hays RD. Evaluating the equivalence of health care ratings by whites and Hispanics. Med Care.2000;38:517-527.
21.
Hays RD, Morales LS, Reise SP. Item response theory and health outcomes measurement in the 21st century. Med Care. 2000;9(suppl):II28-II42.
22.
US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2000 final review. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hp2000/hp2k01.pdf.
23.
National Medical Association. Conscience of American medicine: where the NMA stands on key health policy issues, October 29, 2004. Available at: http://www.nmanet.org/Health_policy-nma.htm.
