The goal of human factors engineering is to optimize the relationship between humans and systems by studyinghuman behavior, abilities, and limitations and using this knowledge to design systems for safe and effective human use. With the assumption that the human component of any system will inevitably produce errors, human factors engineers design systems and human/machine interfaces that are robust enough to reduce error rates and the effect of the inevitable error within the system. In this article, we review the extent and nature of medical error and then discuss human factors engineering tools that have potential applicability. These tools include taxonomies of human and system error and error data collection and analysis methods. Finally, we describe studies that have examined medical error, and on the basis of these studies, present conclusions about how human factors engineering can significantly reduce medical errors and their effects.
Kantowitz BH, Sorkin RD. Human Factors: Understanding People-System Relationships. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1983.
2.
Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med.1991;324:377-384.
3.
Quality Interagency Coordination Task Force. Doing what counts for patient safety: federal actions to reduce medical errors and their impact. Available at: http://www.quic.gov/report/.
4.
Lambert EC. Modern Medical Mistakes. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1978.
5.
Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, Localio AR, Hiatt HH. Incidence of adverse events and negligent care in hospitalized patients. Trans Assoc Am Physicians. 1990;103:137-144.
6.
Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med.1991;324:370-376.
7.
Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health Care System. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.
8.
Dubois RW, Brook RH. Preventable deaths: who, how often, and why?Ann Intern Med.1988;109:582-589.
9.
Brown SL, Bogner MS, Parmentier CM, Taylor JB. Human error and patient-controlled analgesia pumps. J Intraven Nurs. 1997;20:311-316.
10.
Bogner MS. Designing medical devices to reduce the likelihood of error. Health Care Today. March/April 1999:108-113.
11.
Bordage G, Zacks R. The structure of medical knowledge in the memories of medical students and general practitioners: categories and prototypes. Med Educ. 1984;18:406-416.
12.
Patel VL, Groen GJ, Frederiksen CH. Differences between medical students and doctors in memory of clinical cases. Med Educ. 1986;20:3-9.
13.
Coughlin LD, Patel VL. Processing of critical information by physicians and medical students. J Med Educ. 1987;62:810-828.
14.
Hobus PPM. Expert-novice differences in the role of contextual factors in early medical diagnosis. Paper presented at: Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association; April 20, 1990; Boston, Mass.
15.
van de Wiel MW, Schmidt HG, Boshuizen HP. A failure to reproduce the intermediate effect in clinical case recall. Acad Med.1998;73:894-900.
16.
Eisenberg JM. The best offense is a good defense against medical errors: putting the full-court press on medical errors. Speech made at Duke University Clinical Research Institute; January 20,2000; Durham, NC. Available at:http://www.ahrq.gov/news/spch012000.htm.
17.
Albert T. Action points. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11(1):108-108.
18.
Meyer GS, Eisenberg JM. The end of the beginning: the strategic approach to patient safety research. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11(1):3-3.
19.
Klein HA, Isaacson JJ. Making medical instructions readable. Ergon Des. 2003;Spring:7-12.
Dekker S. The Field Guide to Human Error Investigations. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate; 2002.
22.
Feldman SE, Rundall TG. PROs and the Health Care Quality Improvement Initiative: insights from 50 cases of serious medical mistakes. Med Care Rev. 1993;50:123-152.
23.
Weeks WB, Bagian JP. Developing a culture of safety in the Veterans Health Administration. Eff Clin Pract. 2000;3:270-275.
24.
Berens MJ. Death beds. Reader's Digest. February 2003:94-103.
25.
Smith F. Don't be a victim. Health. September 2003:148-152.
26.
Senders JW. Medical devices, medical errors, and medical accidents. In: Bogner MS, ed. Human Error in Medicine. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1994:159-177.
27.
Reason J. Human Error. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1990.
28.
Institute of Medicine. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Available at: http://www.iom.edu/focuson.asp?id=8089.
29.
Lawton R, Parker D. Barriers to incident reporting in a healthcare system. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11(1):15-15.
30.
Firth-Cozens J. Barriers to incident reporting. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002;11(1):7-7.
31.
Liang BA. Asystem of medical error disclosure. Qual SafHealth Care. 2002;11(1):64-64.
32.
Hollnagel E. Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method CREAM. Oxford, NY: Elsevier; 1998.
33.
Ma J, Drury CG, Richards I, Sarac A. The effectiveness of human factors training in error investigation. Paper presented at: Second International Symposium on Aviation Psychology; April 15, 2003; Columbus, Ohio.
34.
Leape L, Lawthers AG, Brennan TA, Johnson WG. Preventing medical injury. Qual Rev Bull. 1993;19:144-149.
35.
Leape L. Error in medicine. JAMA. 1994;272:1851-1851.
36.
Leape L. entability of medical injurynerBogner Ms,ed. Human Error in Medicine. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1994.
37.
Barber N. Should we consider nonia medical error?Qual Saf Health Care.2002;11(1):81-81.
38.
Makeham MAB, Dovey SM, County M, Kidd MR. An international taxonomy for errors in general practice: a pilot study. Med J Aust. 2002;177:68-68.
39.
Mc Nutt RA, Abrams RIid on a model of disease: interactions between adverse events, failures, and their errors. Qual Manag Health Care. 2002;10:23-28.
40.
Cook RA, Woods DD. Operating at the sharp end: the complexity of human error. In: Bogner MS, ed. Human Error in Medicine. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1994:255-310.
41.
Wiegmann DA, Shappell SA. A Human Error Approach to Aviation Accident Analysis. Burlington, Vt: Ashgate; 2003.
42.
Simmons JC. How root-cause analysis can improve patient safety. Qual Lett. October 2001:2-12.
43.
Berry K, Krizek B. Root cause analysis in response to a “near miss.”J Healthc Qual. 2000;22:16-18.
44.
Shinn JA. Root cause analysis: a method of addressing errors and patient risk. Prog Cardiovasc Nurs. Winter 2000:24-25.
45.
Rex JH, Turnbull JE, Allen SJ, vande VoorderK, LutherK. Systematic root cause analysis of adverse drug events in a tertiary referral hospital. J Qual Improv. 2000;26:563-575.
46.
Boyer MM. Root cause analysis in perinatal care: health care professionals creating safer health care systems. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2001;15:40-54.
47.
Paustian PE, Slovenski DJ, Kennedy JW. Information system failures in health care organizations: a case study of a root cause analysis. Paper presented at: Information Resources Management Association International Conference: Managing Information Technology in a Global Environment; May 20-23, 2001; Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
48.
Bagian JP, Gosbee J, Lee CZ, Williams L, McNight SD, Mannos DM. The Veteran Affairs root cause analysis system in action. J Qual Improv. 2002;28:531-545.
49.
Fernandes CMB, Walker R, Price A, Marsden J, Haley L. Root cause analysis of laboratory delays to an emergency department. J Emerg Med.1997;15:735-739.
50.
Cleary PD. A hospitalization from Hell: a patient's perspective on quality. Ann Intern Med.2003;138:33-40.
51.
Spath P. Medical errors: root cause analysis. OR Manager. 1998;14(9):38-41.
52.
Spath P. Your RCA: how do you select events for analysis?Hosp Peer Rev. June 1999:97-99.
53.
Hirsch KA, Wallace DT. One hospital's view of software facilitation of root cause analysis. In: Spath PL, ed. Error Reduction in Health Care. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 2000:165-178.
54.
Cox PM, D'Amato S, Tillotson DJ. Reducing medication errors. Am J Med Qual. 2001;16:81-86.
55.
Gibson G. Categorization of hospital emergency capabilities: some empirical methods to evaluate appropriateness of emergency department utilization. J Trauma. 1978;18:94-102.
56.
Drury CG, Schiro SG, Czaja SJ, Barnes RE. Human reliability in emergency medical response. Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 1977:38-42.
57.
Barnes RE, Drury CG. An application of signal detection theory to EMS decision making. Ethics Sci Med.1976;3:187-193.
58.
Drury CG. Emergency medical services: human and system reliability. Le Travail Humaine. 1984;47(1):75-88.
59.
Johnson C. The application of Petri nets to represent and reason about human factors problems during accident analyses. Paper presented at: Second Eurographics Workshop on Design, Specification, Verification or Interactive Systems; June 8, 1995; Chateau de Bonas, France.
60.
Johnson CW, Telford AJ. Extending the application of formal methods to analyze human error and system failure during accident investigations. Software Engineering Journal. 1996;11: 355-365.
61.
Botting RM, Johnson CW. A formal and structured approach to the use of task analysis in accident modeling. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 1998;49:223-244.
62.
Johnson C. Representing the impact of time on human error and systems failure. Interact Comp. 1998;11:53-86.
63.
Wenner C, Drury CG. Analyzing human error in aircraft ground damage incidents. Int J Ind Ergon. 2000;26:177-199.
64.
International Civil Aviation Organization. ICAO Human Factors Digest No. 1. Fundamental Human Factors Concepts, Circular 216-AN/131. Montreal, Canada: International Civil Aviation Organization; 1989.
65.
Drury CG, Ma J, Woodcock K. Do job aids help incident investigation?Contemporary Ergonomics. 2003:483-488.
66.
Marx D, Watson J. Maintenance Error Causation. Washington, DC: Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aviation Medicine; 2001.
67.
Gantert WA, Tendick F, Bhoyrul S, et al. Error analysis in laparoscopic surgery. In: Proceedings of Surgical-Assist Systems. Bellingham, Wash: International Society for Optical Engineering; 1998:74-77.
68.
Jiang Z, Miao S, Zamorano L, Li Q, Gong J, Diaz F. Technology and human error in image-guided surgeries. In: Proceedings of Surgical-Assist Systems. Bellingham, Wash: International Society for Optical Engineering; 1998:78-84.
69.
Drury CG. Ergonomics and the quality movement (The Ergonomics Society 1996 Lecture). Ergonomics. 1997;40:249-264.
70.
Drury CG. Service quality and human factors. AI and Society. 2003;17(2):78-96.
71.
Hackman JR, Wageman R. Total quality management: empirical, conceptual, and practical issues. Admin Sci Q. 1995;40:308-342.
72.
Routhieaux RL, Gutek BA. TQM/CQI effectiveness at team and departmental levels. J Qual Manag. 1998;3(1):39-62.
73.
Bainbridge L. Ironies of automation. Automatica. 1983;19:775-770.
74.
Casey S. Set Phasers on Stun and Other True Tales of Design, Technology, and Human Error. 2nd ed.Santa Barbara, Calif: Aegean; 1998.
75.
McCarthy JC, Fallon E, Bannon L. Dialogues on function allocation. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2000;52:191-202.
76.
Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 1989;19:319-337.
77.
Wilson JR. Ergonomics and participation. In: Wilson JR, Corlett EN, eds. Evaluation of Human Work. 2nd ed.London, UK: Taylor and Francis; 1995:1071-1096.
