Pressure is building for performance measures that can be collected inexpensively and repeatedly for internal and external accountability and quality improvement. The objective of this study was to develop and test measures obtainable from administrative data covering each of the Institute of Medicine’s (IOM) 6 aims. Measure definitions were developed for 3 common chronic conditions and were revised after testing the feasibility of collecting them from claims data. The setting was a large, multispecialty medical group in the Midwest and included all adult patients with diabetes, coronary heart disease, or depression. Problems identified in the original 99 measures led to refinements or elimination. The resulting 46 measures ready for use include 11 measures for 5 aims applicable to most common chronic conditions, plus 10 to 14 effectiveness measures for each condition. They have been successfully used to describe care quality changes for these patients over time. This starter set for the 6 IOM aims should be tested and expanded by others.
Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
2.
Institute of Medicine. To Err Is Human. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
3.
McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al.The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med.2003;348: 2635-2645.
4.
Corrigan JM.Opportunities for improving quality in the health care industry. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2000;76: 81-91.
5.
McGlynn EA.Selecting common measures of quality and system performance. Med Care. 2003;41(suppl 1): I39-I47.
6.
Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Burstin HR, et al.Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Med Care. 2000;38: 261-271.
7.
Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al.Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients: results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med.1991; 324: 370-376.
8.
Brennan TA, Localio RJ, Laird NL.Reliability and validity of judgments concerning adverse events suffered by hospitalized patients. Med Care. 1989;27: 1148-1158.
9.
AMA, JCAHO, NCQA release common measures for diabetes care. Healthc Leadersh Manag Rep.2001;9: 15-16.
10.
Hurley JS, Roberts M, Solberg LI, et al.Laboratory safety monitoring of chronic medications in ambulatory care settings. J Gen Intern Med.2005;20: 331-333.
11.
Solberg LI, Hurley JS, Roberts MH, et al.Measuring patient safety in ambulatory care: potential for identifying medical group drug-drug interaction rates using claims data. Am J Manag Care. 2004;10: 753-759.
12.
Stevens RJ, Kothari V, Adler AI, Stratton IM.The UKPDS risk engine: a model for the risk of coronary heart disease in type II diabetes (UKPDS 56). Clin Sci (Lond).2001;101: 671-679.
13.
NQF-Endorsed National Voluntary Consensus Standards for Ambulatory Care. Available at: http://www.qualityforum.org/docs/ambulatory_care/tbambphase2diabTABLE09-13-05hww.pdf. Accessed November 11, 2005.
14.
Johnson CW.How will we get the data and what will we do with it then? Issues in the reporting of adverse healthcare events. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12(suppl 2): ii64-ii67.
15.
Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Burstin HR, et al.Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Med Care. 2000;38: 261-271.
16.
Baker GR, Norton PG, Flintoft V, et al.The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada. CMAJ.2004;170: 1678-1686.
17.
Wilson RM, Runciman WB, Gibberd RW, Harrison BT, Newby L, Hamilton JD.The quality in Australian health care study. Med J Aus.1995;163: 458-471.
18.
Zhan C, Kelley E, Yang HP, et al.Assessing patient safety in the United States: challenges and opportunities. Med Care. 2005;43(suppl 3): I42-I47.
19.
Murray M, Berwick DM.Advanced access: reducing waiting and delays in primary care. JAMA. 2003;289: 1035-1040.
20.
Murray M, Bodenheimer T, Rittenhouse D, Grumbach K.Improving timely access to primary care: case studies of the advanced access model. JAMA. 2003;289: 1042-1046.
21.
Gerteis M, Edgman-Levitan S, Daley J.Through the Patient’s Eyes: Understanding and Promoting Patient-Centered Care. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass; 1993.
22.
Flach SD, McCoy KD, Vaughn TE, Ward MM, Bootsmiller BJ, Doebbeling BN.Does patient-centered care improve provision of preventive services?J Gen Intern Med.2004;19: 1019-1026.
23.
Saultz JW, Lochner J.Interpersonal continuity of care and care outcomes: a critical review. Ann Fam Med.2005;3: 159-166.
24.
Davis K, Schoenbaum SC, Collins KS, Tenney K, Hughes DL, Audet AMJ.Room for improvement: patients report on the quality of their health care. The Commonwealth Fund, April 2002.
25.
Saultz JW, Albedaiwi W.Interpersonal continuity of care and patient satisfaction: a critical review. Ann Fam Med.2004;2: 445-451.
26.
Solberg LI, Maciosek MV, Sperl-Hillen JM, et al.Does improved access to care affect utilization and costs for patients with chronic conditions?Am J Manag Care. 2004; 10: 717-722.
27.
Hazlehurst B, Frost HR, Sittig DF, Stevens VJ.MediClass: a system for detecting and classifying encounter-based clinical events in any electronic medical record. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12: 517-529.
28.
Hazlehurst B, Mullooly J, Naleway A, Crane B.Detecting possible vaccination reactions in clinical notes. Paper presented at: American Medical Informatics Association Annual Conference; October 2005; Washington, DC.
29.
Hazlehurst B, Sittig DF, Stevens VJ, et al.Natural language processing in the electronic medical record: assessing clinicians’ adherence to tobacco treatment guidelines. Am J Prev Med.2005;29: 434-439.
30.
Scholle SH.NCQA behavioral health measurement efforts. J Manag Care Pharm. 2005;11(suppl 3): S9-S11.
