Characteristics of Quality and Patient Safety Curricula in Major Teaching Hospitals

Abstract

The authors recently discovered 2 quality and patient safety curricula for internal medicine and general surgery residents in major teaching hospitals: an infrequent formal curriculum developed by the university and a positive informal curriculum found in the teaching hospital. A hidden curriculum was postulated. These data were gathered through applied qualitative research methodology. In this article, curricular characteristics of the formal, informal, and hidden curricula are described and analyzed. Themes evaluated were planning, delivery, evaluation, drivers, responsible entity, and resources. The data show different curricular characteristics in each theme, especially for the formal and informal curricula. Understanding curricular characteristics represents the next step in understanding the environments of resident quality and safety learning, especially in the academic hospital setting. Aligning the formal and informal curricula as well as leveraging all curricula could improve educational venues for quality and safety and institutional clinical performance, and promote a learning health care system.

Keywords

quality patient safety education of quality education of safety

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ayanian JZ , Weissman JS Teaching hospitals and quality of care: a review of the literature. Milbank Q. 2002;80:569-593.

Olson L , Aisner D , McGinnis JM , ed. The Learning Healthcare System: Workshop Summary. Roundtable on Evidence-Based Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2007.

Hafferty FS Beyond curriculum reform: confronting medicine’s hidden curriculum. Acad Med. 1998;73:403-407.

Pingleton SK , Horak B. , Davis D. , Goldmann M. , Keroack M. , Dickler R. Quality education for residents in major teaching hospitals. Acad Med. In press.

Collingridge DS , Gantt EE The quality of quality research. Am J Med Qual. 2008;23:389-395.

Glaser BG , Strauss AL The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York, NY: Aldine Transaction; 1967.

Boonyasi RT , Windish DM , Chakraborti C. , Feldman LS , Rubin HR , Bass EB Effectiveness of teaching quality improvement to clinicians: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007;298:1023-1037.

Accreditation Council for Graduate Medicine Education. Program directors (PD) "virtual handbook." http://www.Acgme.org/acWebsite/home/PDVirtualHandbook.asp. Accessed May 29, 2009.

Batalden P. , Davidoff F. Teaching quality improvement: the devil is in the details. JAMA. 2007;298:1059-1061.

10.

Gofton W. , Regehr G. What we don’t know we are teaching: unveiling the hidden curriculum . Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;449:20-27.

11.

White CB , Kamagai AK , Ross PT , Fantone JC A qualitative exploration of how the conflict between the formal and informal curriculum influences student values and behaviors. Acad Med . 2009;84:597-603.

12.

Ratanawongsa N. , Teherani A. , Hauer K. Third-year medical students’ experiences with dying patients during the internal medicine clerkship: a qualitative study of the informal curriculum. Acad Med. 2005;80:641-647.

13.

The Joint Commission. Facts about patient safety. http://www.jointcommission.org/PatientSafety/ . Accessed May 29, 2009.

14.

Griner PF Leadership strategies of medical school deans to promote quality and safety . Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007;33:63-72.

15.

Shojania KG , Levinson W. Clinicians in quality improvement: a new career pathway in academic medicine. JAMA. 2009;301:766-768.

16.

Ogrinc G. , Mooney SE , Estrada C. , et al. The SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines for quality improvement reporting: explanation and elaboration . Qual Saf Health Care. 2008;17(suppl 1):i13-i32.