Systematically Seeking Clinicians’ Insights to Identify New Safety Measures for Intensive Care Units and General Surgery Services

Abstract

Comprehensive measures to benchmark or track safety performance do not yet exist. The authors aimed to develop and validate a process to identify comprehensive, clinically meaningful sets of safety measures that would draw on the clinical experiences and perceptions of active practitioners. They pilot tested this process for safety measure development for 2 hospital departments (ie, intensive care units and general surgery services) by holding 7 brainstorming sessions with physicians and nurses in major academic and community teaching hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts, and Baltimore, Maryland. Participants identified lists of patient harms that they considered to be among the 20 most frequent and the 20 most severe in their respective units. The authors generated a master list of patient harms, which participants then ranked by both frequency and severity via E-mail voting. This process produced safety measures with inherent credibility with clinicians on the front lines of care.

Keywords

safety measures clinician insight ICU services general surgery services

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Committee on the Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System . Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000.

Pronovost PJ , Colantuoni E. Measuring preventable harm: helping science keep pace with policy. JAMA. 2009;301: 1273-1275.

AHRQ Quality Indicators. Patient safety indicators overview. http://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/psi_overview.htm . Accessed July 3, 2009.

Bratzler DW , Hunt DR The surgical infection prevention and surgical care improvement projects: national initiatives to improve outcomes for patients having surgery. Clin Infect Dis. 2006;43:322-330.

Khuri SF , Daley J. , Henderson W. , et al. The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 1998;228:491-507.

Farley DO , Greenberg MD , Haviland AM , Lovejoy S. Prioritizing patient safety outcomes measures: results of an expert consensus process. http://www.rand.org/pubs/working_papers/2008/RAND_WR601.pdf . Accessed July 3, 2009.

Hunt DR , Verzier N. , Abend SL , et al. Fundamentals of Medicare Patient Safety Surveillance: intent, Relevance, and Transparency. AHRQ Publication No. 05-0021-2. http://www .ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bookshelf/br.fcgi?book=aps2&part=A1924. Accessed February 16, 2010.

Pronovost P. , Holzmueller CG , Needham DM , et al. How will we know patients are safer? An organization-wide approach to measuring and improving safety. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1988-1995.

Iezzoni LI , Daley J. , Heeren T. , et al. Identifying complications of care using administrative data . Med Care. 1994;32: 700-715.

10.

Mann S. , Pratt S. , Gluck P. , et al. Assessing quality obstetrical care: development of standardized measures. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2006 ;32:497-505.