Is Telemetry Monitoring Useful in Patients Admitted With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome?

Abstract

Patients with a chief complaint of chest pain are frequently monitored by telemetry for evaluation of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, there is insufficient evidence to support this practice in younger patients without coronary artery disease (CAD). The objective is to assess outcomes of patients younger than 50 years of age and monitored by telemetry. Consecutive medical records of patients admitted for chest pain between January 1, 2009, and June 30, 2010, were reviewed. Patients were excluded who had a CAD history, an abnormal initial troponin, or an abnormal initial electrocardiogram. The remaining patients’ charts were evaluated for adverse events such as death, dysrhythmias, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, or upgrade to a higher level of care. Ultimately, 814 patients were selected for study. No study participants suffered a significant adverse event. When being evaluated for ACS, patients younger than 50 without a history of CAD may not benefit from telemetry monitoring.

Keywords

telemetry acute coronary syndrome chest pain health care cost

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Pitts

Niska

Burt

CW.

National hospital ambulatory medical care survey: 2006 emergency department summary. Natl Health Stat Report. 2008;(7):1-38.

Amsterdam

Kirk

Bluemke

et al . Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;122:1756-1776.

Hess

Brison

Perry

et al . Development of a clinical prediction rule for 30-day cardiac events in emergency department patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;59:115-125.

Lee

Goldman

Evaluation of the patient with acute chest pain. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1187-1195.

Goldman

Cook

Johnson

Brand

Rouan

Lee

TH.

Prediction of the need for intensive care in patients who come to the emergency departments with acute chest pain. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:1498-1504.

Chen

Hollander

JE.

When do patients need admission to a telemetry bed?

J Emerg Med. 2007;33:53-60.

Henriques-Forsythe

Ivonye

Jamched

Kamuguisha

Olejeme

Onwuanyi

AE.

Is telemetry overused? Is it as helpful as thought?

Cleve Clin J Med. 2009;76:368-372.

Ward

Eckman

Schauer

Raja

Collins

Cost-effectiveness of telemetry for hospitalized patients with low-risk chest pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2011;18:279-286.

Chen

Zakaria

Behind the monitor—the trouble with telemetry: a teachable moment. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:894.

10.

Perkins

McCurdy

Vilke

Al-Marshad

AA.

Telemetry bed usage for patients with low-risk chest pain: review of the literature for the clinician. J Emerg Med. 2014;46:273-277.

11.

Drew

Califf

Funk

et al . Practice standards for electrocardiographic monitoring in hospital settings: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Clinical Cardiology, and Cardiovascular Disease in the Young: endorsed by the International Society of Computerized Electrocardiology and the American Association of Critical Care Nurses. Circulation. 2004;110:2721-2746.

12.

Estrada

Rosman

Prasad

et al . Role of telemetry monitoring in the non-intensive care unit. Am J Cardiol. 1995;76:960-965.

13.

Hollander

Sites

Pollack

Jr Shofer

FS.

Lack of utility of telemetry monitoring for identification of cardiac death and life-threatening ventricular dysrhythmias in low-risk patients with chest pain. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;43:71-76.

14.

Durairaj

Reilly

Das

et al . Emergency department admissions to inpatient cardiac telemetry beds: a prospective cohort study of risk stratification and outcomes. Am J Med. 2001;110:7-11.

15.

Elbarouni

Goodman

Yan

et al . Validation of the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Event (GRACE) risk score for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome in Canada. Am Heart J. 2009;158:392-399.

16.

Pollack

Sites

Shofer

Sease

Hollander

JE.

Application of the TIMI risk score for unstable angina and non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome to an unselected emergency department chest pain population. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13:13-18.

17.

Than

Flaws

Sanders

et al . Development and validation of the emergency department assessment of chest pain score and 2 h accelerated diagnostic protocol. Emerg Med Australas. 2014;26:34-44.

18.

Backus

Six

Kelder

et al . A prospective validation of the HEART score for chest pain patients at the emergency department. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:2153-2158.

19.

Roffi

Patrono

Collet

et al . 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting Without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2016;37:267-315.