This systematic review examined factors associated with overuse of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The authors searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from January 1998 to March 2017. Studies were included if they were written in English, contained original data, involved a US population, and examined factors potentially associated with overuse of CRC screening. Paired reviewers independently screened abstracts, assessed quality, and extracted data. In 8 studies, the associations between patient factors, including age, sex, race, and number of comorbidities, were tested and were inconsistently associated with CRC screening overuse. Overuse of screening was greater in the Northeast/Mid-Atlantic regions and in urban areas and was lower in academically affiliated centers. Although the literature supports important overuse of CRC screening, it remains unclear what drives these practices. Future research should thoroughly explore these factors and test the impact of interventions to reduce overuse of screening.
CasselCKGuestJA.Choosing wisely: helping physicians and patients make smart decisions about their care. JAMA. 2012;307:1801-1802.
2.
GradyDRedbergRF.Less is more: how less health care can result in better health. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170:749-750.
3.
AckermanSGonzalesR.The context of antibiotic overuse. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157:211-212.
4.
US Government Accountability Office. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: effect of long-term federal budget outlook depends on cost containment sustained. https://www.gao.gov/assets/660/651702.pdf. Accessed October 14, 2014.
5.
ReinhardtUEHusseyPSAndersonGF.U.S. health care spending in an international context. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004;23(3):10-25.
6.
KorensteinDFalkRHowellEABishopTKeyhaniS.Overuse of health care services in the United States: an understudied problem. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:171-178.
7.
BaxiSSKaleMKeyhaniS. Overuse of health care services in the management of cancer: a systematic review. Med Care. 2017;55:723-733.
8.
KaleMSBishopTFFedermanADKeyhaniS.Trends in the overuse of ambulatory health care services in the United States. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:142-148.
9.
WiltTJHarrisRPQaseemA.Screening for cancer: advice for high-value care from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:718-725.
10.
Choosing Wisely. Promoting conversations between patients and clinicians. http://www.choosingwisely.org/. Accessed April 10, 2017.
11.
KristAHJonesRMWoolfSH. Timing of repeat colonoscopy: disparity between guidelines and endoscopists’ recommendation. Am J Prev Med. 2007;33:471-478.
12.
Agency for Health care Research and Quality. Glossary: underuse, overuse, misuse. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/glossary/u. Accessed October 18, 2014.
KruseGRKhanSMZaslavskyAMAyanianJZSequistTD.Overuse of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:277-283.
15.
SheffieldKMHanYKuoYFRiallTSGoodwinJS.Potentially inappropriate screening colonoscopy in Medicare patients: variation by physician and geographic region. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:542-550.
16.
PartinMRPowellAABangerterA. Levels and variation in overuse of fecal occult blood testing in the Veterans Health Administration. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1618-1625.
17.
GoodwinJSSinghAReddyNRiallTSKuoYF.Overuse of screening colonoscopy in the Medicare population. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:1335-1343.
18.
PowellAASainiSDBreitensteinMK. Rates and correlates of potentially inappropriate colorectal cancer screening in the Veterans Health Administration. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30:732-741.
19.
MurphyCCSandlerRSGrubberJMJohnsonMRFisherDA.Underuse and overuse of colonoscopy for repeat screening and surveillance in the Veterans Health Administration. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14:436.e1-444.e1.
20.
MeneesSBElliottEGovaniS. The impact of bowel cleansing on follow-up recommendations in average-risk patients with a normal colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:148-154.
21.
SainiSDVijanSSchoenfeldPPowellAAMoserSKerrEA.Role of quality measurement in inappropriate use of screening for colorectal cancer: retrospective cohort study. BMJ. 2014;348:g1247.
22.
CarpentierMYVernonSWBartholomewLKMurphyCCBluethmannSM.Receipt of recommended surveillance among colorectal cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Cancer Surviv. 2013;7:464-483.
23.
HoldenDJJonasDEPorterfieldDSReulandDHarrisR.Systematic review: enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152:668-676.
24.
ParmarRMartelMRostomABarkunAN.Validated scales for colon cleansing: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:197-204.
IskandarHYanYElwingJEarlyDColditzGAWangJS.Predictors of poor adherence of US gastroenterologists with colonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:971-978.
29.
KadivarHGoffBAPhillipsWRAndrillaCHBergAOBaldwinLM.Nonrecommended breast and colorectal cancer screening for young women: a vignette-based survey. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43:231-239.
