One manner in which Presidents attempt to have an enduring policy influence is through the appointment of like-minded justices to the Supreme Court. This article empirically examines Dahl's (1957) hypothesis that justices actually support the policy preferences of the Presidents who appoint them. We study concordance with new data for measuring presidential preferences in the domains of social and economic policy and by incorporating the notion of judicial change over time. We measure presidential preferences for the modern Presidents, Franklin Roosevelt through Bill Clinton, with a survey taken from a random sample of political science scholars who study the Presidency We measure the voting behavior of the President's Supreme Court appointees through their votes in civil liberties and economics cases from 1937 to 1994. Presidents appear to be reasonably successful in their appointments in the short run, but justices on average appear to deviate over time away from the Presidents who appointed them.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abraham, Henry A.1985Justices and Presidents, 2nd ed.New York: Oxford University press.
2.
Achen, Christopher H.1977. “Measuring Representation: Perils of the Correlation Coefficient.”AmericanJournal of Political Science21 (4): 805-815.
3.
Adamany, David. “Legitimacy, Realigning Elections and the Supreme Court.”Wisconsin Law Review 1973: 790-846.
4.
American Political Science Association. 1994. Directory of Members. Washington, DC.
5.
Bailey, Kenneth D.1988. “The Conceptualization of Validity: Current Perspectives.”Social Science Research17: 117-136.
Baum, Lawrence. 1988. “Measuring Policy Change in the U.S. Supreme Court.”American Political Science Review82 (September): 905-912.
8.
Bork, Robert. 1990. The Tempting of America. New York: Simon and Schuster.
9.
Brace, Paul, and Barbara Hinckley1992. Follow the Leader: Opinion Polls and the Modern Presidency. New York: HarperCollins.
10.
Carmines, Edward G., and Richard A. Zeller. 1979. Reliability and Validity Assessment. Beverly Hills: Sage.
11.
Clayton, James E.1964. The Making of A Justice: The Supreme Court in Action. New York: Dutton.
12.
Comisky, Michael. 1995. “Can Presidents Pack the Supreme Court?"Congress and the Presidency22: 19-33.
13.
Dahl, Robert A.1957. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.”Journal of Public Law6: 279-295.
14.
Epstein, Lee, Valerie Hoekstra, Jeffrey A. Segal, and Harold J. Spaeth. 1998. “Do Political Preferences Change? A Longitudinal Study of U.S. Supreme Court Justices.”Journal of Politics60: 801-818.
15.
Fiske, Susan T., and Shelley E. Taylor. 1991. Social Cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
16.
Flemming, Roy B., and B. Dan Wood. 1997. “The Public and the Supreme Court: Individual Justice Responsiveness to American Policy Moods.”American Journal of Political Science41: 468-498.
17.
Gates, John, and Jeffrey Cohen. 1989. “Presidential Policy Preferences and Supreme Court Appointment Success.”Policy Studies Review8 (4): 800-811.
18.
Greenstein, Fred I., ed. 1988. Leadership in the Modern Presidency. Cambridge, MA. and London, UK: Harvard University Press.
19.
Heck, Edward, and Steven A. Shull. 1982. “Policy Preferences of Justices and Presidents.”Law and Policy Quarterly4 (3): 327-338.
20.
Helmer, Olaf. 1978. “The Use of Expert Opinion in International Relations Forecasting.” In Nazli Choucri and Thomas Robinson, eds., Forecasting in International Relations. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
21.
Kendall, Maurice G., and Jean Dickinson Gibbons. 1990. Rank Correlation Methods, 5th ed.New York: Oxford University Press.
22.
King, Gary. 1986. “How Not to Lie with Statistics: Avoiding Common Mistakes in Quantitative Political Science.”American Journal of Political Science30 (3): 666-687.
23.
Kluger, Richard. 1975. Simple Justice. New York: Vintage.
24.
MacKenzie, G. Calvin. 1981. The Politics of Presidential Appointments. New York: MacMillan.
25.
Maranell, G.1970. “The Evaluation of Presidents: An Extension of the Schlesinger Poll.”Journal of American History57: 104-113.
26.
Meinhold, Stephen S., and Steven A. Shull. 1998. “Policy Congruence Between the President and the Solicitor General.”Political Research Quarterly51 (2): 527-537.
27.
Meltsner, Arnold J., ed. 1981. Politics and the Oval Office. San Francisco, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
28.
Miller, Arthur S.1982. “In Defense of Judicial Activism.” In Stephen C. Halpern and Charles M. Lamb, eds., Supreme Court Activism and Restraint. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
29.
Miller, Merle. 1974. Plain Speaking: An Oral Biography of Harry S. Truman. New York: Putnam Books.
30.
Mishler, William, and Reginald S. Sheehan. 1993. “The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Opinions.”American Political Science Review87 (1): 87-101.
31.
Mishler, William, and Reginald S. Sheehan. 1996. “Public Opinion, the Attitudinal Model, and Supreme Court Decision Making: A Micro-Analytic Perspective.”Journal of Politics58 (1): 169-200.
32.
Norpoth, Helmut, and Jeffrey A. Segal. 1994. “Popular Influence on Supreme Court Decisions.”American Political Science Review88 (3): 711-716.
33.
Rabinowitz, George, and Stuart Elaine MacDonald. 1989. “A Directional Theory of Voting.”American Political Science Review83: 93-122.
34.
Rehnquist, William H.1987. The Supreme Court. New York: William Morrow
35.
Rohde, David, and Harold Spaeth. 1976. Supreme Court Decision Making. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
36.
Rogers, William. 1993. “Regression Standard Errors in Clustered Samples.”Stata Technical Bulletin13, pp. 19-23.
37.
Scigliano, Robert. 1971. The Supreme Court and the Presidency. New York: Free Press.
38.
Siegel, Sidney1956. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
39.
StataCorp. 1999. Stata User's Guide, Release 6.0. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
40.
Stimson,, James A., Michael B. MacKuen, Robert S. Erikson. 1995. “Dynamic Representation.”American Political Science Review89: 543-565.
41.
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education. 1971. 402 U.S. 1.
42.
Thornburg v. Gingles. 1986. 478 U.S. 30.
43.
Timpone, Richard J.1998. “Ties That Bind: Measurement, Demographics, and Social Connectedness.”Political Behavior20 (1): 53-77.
44.
Warren, Charles. 1923. The Supreme Court in United States History. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
45.
Warren, Earl. 1977. The Memoirs of Earl Warren. New York: Doubleday
46.
Watson, Richard A., and Norman C. Thomas. 1988. The Politics of the Presidency. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
47.
Wolfe, Christopher. 1990. Judicial Activism: Bulwark of Freedom or Precarious Security?Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
48.
Yalof, David Alistair. 1999. Pursuit of Justices. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49.
Yates, Jeff, and Andrew Whitford. 1998. “Presidential Power and the United States Supreme Court.”Political Research Quarterly51 (2): 539-550.
